Literature DB >> 23289736

The future of carbon dioxide for polymer processing in tissue engineering.

Manjari Bhamidipati1, Aaron M Scurto, Michael S Detamore.   

Abstract

The use of CO2 for scaffold fabrication in tissue engineering was popularized in the mid-1990 s as a tool for producing polymeric foam scaffolds, but had fallen out of favor to some extent, in part due to challenges with pore interconnectivity. Pore interconnectivity issues have since been resolved by numerous dedicated studies that have collectively outlined how to control the appropriate parameters to achieve a pore structure desirable for tissue regeneration. In addition to CO2 foaming, several groups have leveraged CO2 as a swelling agent to impregnate scaffolds with drugs and other bioactive additives, and for encapsulation of plasmids within scaffolds for gene delivery. Moreover, in contrast to CO2 foaming, which typically relies on supercritical CO2 at very high pressures, CO2 at much lower pressures has also been used to sinter polymeric microspheres together in the presence of cells to create cell-seeded scaffolds in a single step. CO2 has a number of advantages for polymer processing in tissue engineering, including its ease of use, low cost, and the opportunity to circumvent the use of organic solvents. Building on these advantages, and especially now with the tremendous precedent that has paved the way in defining operating parameters, and making the technology accessible for new groups to adapt, we invite and encourage our colleagues in the field to leverage CO2 as a new tool to enhance their own respective unique capabilities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23289736      PMCID: PMC3627402          DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0361

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev        ISSN: 1937-3368            Impact factor:   6.389


  59 in total

1.  Osteochondral interface regeneration of the rabbit knee with macroscopic gradients of bioactive signals.

Authors:  Nathan H Dormer; Milind Singh; Liang Zhao; Neethu Mohan; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 2.  Electrospinning for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Koushik Ramachandran; Pelagia-Irene Gouma
Journal:  Recent Pat Nanotechnol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.952

3.  PLGA/chitosan composites from a combination of spray drying and supercritical fluid foaming techniques: new carriers for DNA delivery.

Authors:  Hemin Nie; Lai Yeng Lee; Hui Tong; Chi-Hwa Wang
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 9.776

4.  Continuous gradients of material composition and growth factors for effective regeneration of the osteochondral interface.

Authors:  Neethu Mohan; Nathan H Dormer; Kenneth L Caldwell; Vincent H Key; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Microsphere-based seamless scaffolds containing macroscopic gradients of encapsulated factors for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Milind Singh; Casey P Morris; Ryan J Ellis; Michael S Detamore; Cory Berkland
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 3.056

6.  Composite electrospun scaffolds for engineering tubular bone grafts.

Authors:  Andrew Krishna Ekaputra; Yefang Zhou; Simon McKenzie Cool; Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  Active growth factor delivery from poly(D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) foams prepared in supercritical CO(2).

Authors:  D D Hile; M L Amirpour; A Akgerman; M V Pishko
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 9.776

8.  The effect of processing variables on morphological and mechanical properties of supercritical CO2 foamed scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Lisa J White; Victoria Hutter; Hongyun Tai; Steven M Howdle; Kevin M Shakesheff
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 8.947

9.  Aligned porous materials by directional freezing of solutions in liquid CO2.

Authors:  Haifei Zhang; James Long; Andrew I Cooper
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2005-10-05       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Control of pore size and structure of tissue engineering scaffolds produced by supercritical fluid processing.

Authors:  Hongyun Tai; Melissa L Mather; Daniel Howard; Wenxin Wang; Lisa J White; John A Crowe; Steve P Morgan; Amit Chandra; David J Williams; Steven M Howdle; Kevin M Shakesheff
Journal:  Eur Cell Mater       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 3.942

View more
  5 in total

1.  Subcritical CO2 sintering of microspheres of different polymeric materials to fabricate scaffolds for tissue engineering.

Authors:  Manjari Bhamidipati; BanuPriya Sridharan; Aaron M Scurto; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 7.328

2.  Microsphere-based gradient implants for osteochondral regeneration: a long-term study in sheep.

Authors:  Neethu Mohan; Vineet Gupta; Banu Priya Sridharan; Adam J Mellott; Jeremiah T Easley; Ross H Palmer; Richard A Galbraith; Vincent H Key; Cory J Berkland; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Regen Med       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.806

3.  Supercritical CO2 foaming of thermoplastic materials derived from maize: proof-of-concept use in mammalian cell culture applications.

Authors:  Grissel Trujillo-de Santiago; Cynthia Guadalupe Portales-Cabrera; Roberto Portillo-Lara; Diana Araiz-Hernández; Maria Cristina Del Barone; Erika García-López; Cecilia Rojas-de Gante; María de Los Angeles De Santiago-Miramontes; Juan Carlos Segoviano-Ramírez; Silverio García-Lara; Ciro Ángel Rodríguez-González; Mario Moisés Alvarez; Ernesto Di Maio; Salvatore Iannace
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Supercritical Fluid Technology: An Emphasis on Drug Delivery and Related Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Ranjith Kumar Kankala; Yu Shrike Zhang; Shi-Bin Wang; Chia-Hung Lee; Ai-Zheng Chen
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 9.933

Review 5.  Fabrication of Porous Materials from Natural/Synthetic Biopolymers and Their Composites.

Authors:  Udeni Gunathilake T M Sampath; Yern Chee Ching; Cheng Hock Chuah; Johari J Sabariah; Pai-Chen Lin
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-12-07       Impact factor: 3.623

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.