Literature DB >> 18085505

Control of pore size and structure of tissue engineering scaffolds produced by supercritical fluid processing.

Hongyun Tai1, Melissa L Mather, Daniel Howard, Wenxin Wang, Lisa J White, John A Crowe, Steve P Morgan, Amit Chandra, David J Williams, Steven M Howdle, Kevin M Shakesheff.   

Abstract

Tissue engineering scaffolds require a controlled pore size and structure to host tissue formation. Supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2) processing may be used to form foamed scaffolds in which the escape of CO2 from a plasticized polymer melt generates gas bubbles that shape the developing pores. The process of forming these scaffolds involves a simultaneous change in phase in the CO2 and the polymer, resulting in rapid expansion of a surface area and changes in polymer rheological properties. Hence, the process is difficult to control with respect to the desired final pore size and structure. In this paper, we describe a detailed study of the effect of polymer chemical composition, molecular weight and processing parameters on final scaffold characteristics. The study focuses on poly(DL-lactic acid) (PDLLA) and poly(DL-lactic acid-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) as polymer classes with potential application as controlled release scaffolds for growth factor delivery. Processing parameters under investigation were temperature (from 5 to 55 degrees C) and pressure (from 60 to 230 bar). A series of amorphous PDLLA and PLGA polymers with various molecular weights (from 13 KD to 96 KD) and/or chemical compositions (the mole percentage of glycolic acid in the polymers was 0, 15, 25, 35 and 50 respectively) were employed. The resulting scaffolds were characterised by optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and micro X-ray computed tomography (microCT). This is the first detailed study on using these series polymers for scaffold formation by supercritical technique. This study has demonstrated that the pore size and structure of the supercritical PDLLA and PLGA scaffolds can be tailored by careful control of processing conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18085505     DOI: 10.22203/ecm.v014a07

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cell Mater        ISSN: 1473-2262            Impact factor:   3.942


  14 in total

1.  Ultrasonic monitoring of foamed polymeric tissue scaffold fabrication.

Authors:  Melissa L Mather; John A Crowe; Stephen P Morgan; Lisa J White; Alexander N Kalashnikov; Vladimir G Ivchenko; Steven M Howdle; Kevin M Shakesheff
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2008-04-05       Impact factor: 3.896

2.  In vitro, ex vivo and in silico mechanistic elucidation of the performance of an optimized porosity-controlled multi-elemental transbuccal system.

Authors:  Oluwatoyin A Adeleke; Yahya E Choonara; Lisa C du Toit; Pradeep Kumar; Viness Pillay
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Human dental pulp progenitor cell behavior on aqueous and hexafluoroisopropanol based silk scaffolds.

Authors:  Weibo Zhang; Ivy Pruitt Ahluwalia; Robert Literman; David L Kaplan; Pamela C Yelick
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 4.396

4.  Biodegradable polylactide/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite foam scaffolds for bone tissue engineering applications.

Authors:  Claire Delabarde; Christopher J G Plummer; Pierre-Etienne Bourban; Jan-Anders E Månson
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2012-03-22       Impact factor: 3.896

5.  Chitosan impregnation with biologically active tryaryl imidazoles in supercritical carbon dioxide.

Authors:  Anastasia V Cherkasova; Nikolay N Glagolev; Andrey I Shienok; Tatiana S Demina; Svetlana L Kotova; Natalia L Zaichenko; Tatiana A Akopova; Peter S Timashev; Victor N Bagratashvili; Anna B Solovieva
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 6.  Microfabricated biomaterials for engineering 3D tissues.

Authors:  Pinar Zorlutuna; Nasim Annabi; Gulden Camci-Unal; Mehdi Nikkhah; Jae Min Cha; Jason W Nichol; Amir Manbachi; Hojae Bae; Shaochen Chen; Ali Khademhosseini
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-03-13       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Chitosan-based scaffolds for bone tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sheeny Lan Levengood; Miqin Zhang
Journal:  J Mater Chem B       Date:  2014-06-07       Impact factor: 6.331

Review 8.  The future of carbon dioxide for polymer processing in tissue engineering.

Authors:  Manjari Bhamidipati; Aaron M Scurto; Michael S Detamore
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 6.389

9.  Solvent free production of porous PDLLA/calcium carbonate composite scaffolds improves the release of bone growth factors.

Authors:  H Schliephake; M Vucak; J Boven; S Backhaus; T Annen; M Epple
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-09-03

10.  Remotely triggered scaffolds for controlled release of pharmaceuticals.

Authors:  Paul Roach; David J McGarvey; Martin R Lees; Clare Hoskins
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 5.923

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.