Literature DB >> 23289517

The perils of ignoring design effects in experimental studies: lessons from a mammography screening trial.

Beth A Glenn1, Roshan Bastani, Annette E Maxwell.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Threats to external validity, including pretest sensitisation and the interaction of selection and an intervention, are frequently overlooked by researchers despite their potential to significantly influence study outcomes. The purpose of this investigation was to conduct secondary data analyses to assess the presence of external validity threats in the setting of a randomised trial designed to promote mammography use in a high-risk sample of women.
DESIGN: During the trial, recruitment and intervention, implementation took place in three cohorts (with different ethnic composition), utilising two different designs (pretest-posttest control group design and posttest only control group design).
RESULTS: Results reveal that the intervention produced different outcomes across cohorts, dependent upon the research design used and the characteristics of the sample.
CONCLUSION: These results illustrate the importance of weighing the pros and cons of potential research designs before making a selection and attending more closely to issues of external validity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23289517      PMCID: PMC3630258          DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2012.756880

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Health        ISSN: 0887-0446


  18 in total

1.  Tailored risk notification for women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  R Bastani; A E Maxwell; C Bradford; I P Das; K X Yan
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.018

2.  Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julian P T Higgins; Simon G Thompson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-06-15       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Why don't we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Edward Lichtenstein; Alfred C Marcus
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  External validity: we need to do more.

Authors:  Russell E Glasgow; Lawrence W Green; Lisa M Klesges; David B Abrams; Edwin B Fisher; Michael G Goldstein; Laura L Hayman; Judith K Ockene; C Tracy Orleans
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  2006-04

Review 5.  Alternatives to randomisation in the evaluation of public health interventions: design challenges and solutions.

Authors:  C P Bonell; J Hargreaves; S Cousens; D Ross; R Hayes; M Petticrew; B R Kirkwood
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Public health evaluation: which designs work, for whom and under what circumstances?

Authors:  Laurence Moore; Graham F Moore
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.710

7.  Effect of pretesting on intentions and behaviour: a pedometer and walking intervention.

Authors:  John C Spence; Jenny Burgess; Wendy Rodgers; Terra Murray
Journal:  Psychol Health       Date:  2009-09

Review 8.  Meta-Analysis. Potentials and promise.

Authors:  M Egger; G D Smith
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1997-11-22

9.  A randomized, controlled trial to test the efficacy of an online, parent-based intervention for reducing the risks associated with college-student alcohol use.

Authors:  Elizabeth Donovan; Mollie Wood; Kezia Frayjo; Ryan A Black; Daniel A Surette
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.913

10.  Subgroup analysis, covariate adjustment and baseline comparisons in clinical trial reporting: current practice and problems.

Authors:  Stuart J Pocock; Susan E Assmann; Laura E Enos; Linda E Kasten
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2002-10-15       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  1 in total

1.  Impact of Risk Assessment and Tailored versus Nontailored Risk Information on Colorectal Cancer Testing in Primary Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Celette Sugg Skinner; Ethan A Halm; Wendy Pechero Bishop; Chul Ahn; Samir Gupta; David Farrell; Jay Morrow; Manjula Julka; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Emily Marks; Susan M Rawl
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.254

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.