Literature DB >> 23288411

Differentiation of human ES cell line KIND-2 to yield tripotent cardiovascular progenitors.

Harsha Pawani1, Punam Nagvenkar, Prasad Pethe, Deepa Bhartiya.   

Abstract

Human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) have the ability to differentiate into all the three lineages and are an ideal starting material to obtain cells of desired lineage for regenerative medicine. Continued efforts are needed to evolve more robust protocols to obtain cells of desired lineages and in larger numbers. Also, it has now been realized that rather than transplanting fully committed cells differentiated in vitro, it may be ideal to transplant committed progenitors which retain the intrinsic ability to proliferate and also differentiate better into multiple lineages based on the in vivo cues. For cardiac regeneration, the desired progenitor is a multipotent cardiovascular progenitor which has the ability to regenerate cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and also smooth muscle cells. The present study was undertaken to carefully compare three widely used protocols to differentiate hESCs into cardiac progenitors, viz., spontaneous differentiation, differentiation by END-2-conditioned medium, and directed differentiation using growth factors followed by quantitative PCR to study the relative expression of early cardiovascular markers. hESC differentiation mimicked the early embryonic development, and the transition into mesoendoderm, mesoderm, early cardiac progenitors, and cardiac cells associated with spontaneous beating was clearly evident in all the three groups. However, compared to spontaneous and END-2-associated differentiation, directed differentiation led to several-fold higher expression of cardiac transcripts (>75-fold Nkx2.5 and >150-fold Tbx5) in response to the stage-specific addition of well-established cardiogenic inducers and inhibitors of specific signaling pathways. We propose to use tripotent cardiovascular progenitors derived by directed differentiation for further preclinical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23288411     DOI: 10.1007/s11626-012-9558-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  46 in total

1.  Evaluating differentiation propensity of in-house derived human embryonic stem cell lines KIND-1 and KIND-2.

Authors:  Punam Nagvenkar; Prasad Pethe; Harsha Pawani; Jyoti Telang; Neeraj Kumar; Indira Hinduja; Kusum Zaveri; Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of human embryonic stem cells differentiating to cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Abdelaziz Beqqali; Jantine Kloots; Dorien Ward-van Oostwaard; Christine Mummery; Robert Passier
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived Flk-1 progenitor cells engraft, differentiate, and improve heart function in a mouse model of acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Christina Mauritz; Andreas Martens; Sebastian V Rojas; Tilman Schnick; Christian Rathert; Natalie Schecker; Sandra Menke; Silke Glage; Robert Zweigerdt; Axel Haverich; Ulrich Martin; Ingo Kutschka
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2011-05-19       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Cardiomyocytes derived from human embryonic stem cells in pro-survival factors enhance function of infarcted rat hearts.

Authors:  Michael A Laflamme; Kent Y Chen; Anna V Naumova; Veronica Muskheli; James A Fugate; Sarah K Dupras; Hans Reinecke; Chunhui Xu; Mohammad Hassanipour; Shailaja Police; Chris O'Sullivan; Lila Collins; Yinhong Chen; Elina Minami; Edward A Gill; Shuichi Ueno; Chun Yuan; Joseph Gold; Charles E Murry
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2007-08-26       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  Survival and maturation of human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes in rat hearts.

Authors:  Wangde Dai; Loren J Field; Michael Rubart; Sean Reuter; Sharon L Hale; Robert Zweigerdt; Ralph E Graichen; Gregory L Kay; Aarne J Jyrala; Alan Colman; Bruce P Davidson; Martin Pera; Robert A Kloner
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 6.  Human embryonic stem cells and cardiac repair.

Authors:  Wei-Zhong Zhu; Kip D Hauch; Chunhui Xu; Michael A Laflamme
Journal:  Transplant Rev (Orlando)       Date:  2008-07-26       Impact factor: 3.943

Review 7.  Skeletal myoblasts as a therapeutic agent.

Authors:  Philippe Menasché
Journal:  Prog Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2007 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 8.194

8.  Human cardiomyocyte progenitor cells differentiate into functional mature cardiomyocytes: an in vitro model for studying human cardiac physiology and pathophysiology.

Authors:  Anke M Smits; Patrick van Vliet; Corina H Metz; Tom Korfage; Joost Pg Sluijter; Pieter A Doevendans; Marie-José Goumans
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 13.491

9.  BRACHYURY and CDX2 mediate BMP-induced differentiation of human and mouse pluripotent stem cells into embryonic and extraembryonic lineages.

Authors:  Andreia S Bernardo; Tiago Faial; Lucy Gardner; Kathy K Niakan; Daniel Ortmann; Claire E Senner; Elizabeth M Callery; Matthew W Trotter; Myriam Hemberger; James C Smith; Lee Bardwell; Ashley Moffett; Roger A Pedersen
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 24.633

10.  Embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte heterogeneity and the isolation of immature and committed cells for cardiac remodeling and regeneration.

Authors:  Kenneth R Boheler; Robert N Joodi; Hui Qiao; Ondrej Juhasz; Amanda L Urick; Sandra L Chuppa; Rebekah L Gundry; Robert P Wersto; Rong Zhou
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 5.443

View more
  6 in total

1.  Different Tissue-Derived Stem Cells: A Comparison of Neural Differentiation Capability.

Authors:  Gabriele Bonaventura; Sandrine Chamayou; Annalisa Liprino; Antonino Guglielmino; Michele Fichera; Massimo Caruso; Maria Luisa Barcellona
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Stem cells, progenitors & regenerative medicine: A retrospection.

Authors:  Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.375

3.  Shifting gears from embryonic to very small embryonic-like stem cells for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Evaluating KIND1 human embryonic stem cell-derived pancreatic progenitors to ameliorate streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice.

Authors:  Varsha Pursani; Sona Kapoor; S M Metkari; Prabha Nair; Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 5.  Pluripotent stem cells for cardiac regeneration: overview of recent advances & emerging trends.

Authors:  Harsha Pawani; Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Transcriptional activator DOT1L putatively regulates human embryonic stem cell differentiation into the cardiac lineage.

Authors:  Varsha Pursani; Deepa Bhartiya; Vivek Tanavde; Mohsin Bashir; Prabha Sampath
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 6.832

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.