Literature DB >> 21614653

Evaluating differentiation propensity of in-house derived human embryonic stem cell lines KIND-1 and KIND-2.

Punam Nagvenkar1, Prasad Pethe, Harsha Pawani, Jyoti Telang, Neeraj Kumar, Indira Hinduja, Kusum Zaveri, Deepa Bhartiya.   

Abstract

Human embryonic stem (hES) cells possess the ability to self-renew indefinitely and provide a potential source of differentiated progeny representing all three embryonic germ layers. Although hES cell lines share the expression of typical pluripotency markers, limited data is available regarding their differentiation capabilities. We have earlier reported the in-house derivation of two hES cell lines, KIND-1 and KIND-2 on human feeders. Here, we describe a comparative study carried out on both these cell lines to better understand the differentiation potential of KIND-1 and KIND-2 by gene expression analysis of representative gene transcripts reflecting pluripotency and the three germ layers viz. ectoderm, mesoderm, and endoderm. Gene expression analysis and immunolocalization studies were undertaken on (a) 7- and 14-d old embryoid bodies (EBs) (b) spontaneously differentiated cells from EBs, (c) cells derived from EBs under the influence of various growth factor treatments and (d) KIND-1 and KIND-2 cells co-cultured on mouse embryonic visceral endoderm-like feeder (END-2). Despite both the cell lines being XX, derived, passaged, and cultured similarly, KIND-1 exhibits preferential differentiation towards endodermal lineage whereas KIND-2 spontaneously forms beating cardiomyocytes. Perhaps the occurrence of discrete epigenetic profile in both the cell lines predisposes them to encompass different developmental potential in vitro. Our data provide evidence for existence of distinct differentiation propensity among hES cell lines and emphasizes the need to derive more hES cell lines for future regenerative medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21614653     DOI: 10.1007/s11626-011-9420-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim        ISSN: 1071-2690            Impact factor:   2.416


  59 in total

Review 1.  Embryonic stem cell-derived embryoid bodies: an in vitro model of eutherian pregastrulation development and early gastrulation.

Authors:  G Weitzer
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2006

2.  Gene expression signatures of seven individual human embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Heli Skottman; Milla Mikkola; Karolina Lundin; Cia Olsson; Anne-Marie Strömberg; Timo Tuuri; Timo Otonkoski; Outi Hovatta; Riitta Lahesmaa
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2005-08-04       Impact factor: 6.277

3.  Derivation of human embryonic stem cell lines from single cells of 4-cell stage embryos: be aware of the risks.

Authors:  A Feki; O Hovatta; M Jaconi
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2008-10-14       Impact factor: 6.918

4.  OCT4 spliced variants are differentially expressed in human pluripotent and nonpluripotent cells.

Authors:  Yaser Atlasi; Seyed J Mowla; Seyed A M Ziaee; Paul J Gokhale; Peter W Andrews
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2008-09-11       Impact factor: 6.277

Review 5.  Human embryonic stem cell stability.

Authors:  Lisa M Hoffman; Melissa K Carpenter
Journal:  Stem Cell Rev       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 5.739

6.  Murine cardiac progenitor cells require visceral embryonic endoderm and primitive streak for terminal differentiation.

Authors:  A Arai; K Yamamoto; J Toyama
Journal:  Dev Dyn       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.780

7.  Genome-wide transcriptional profiling of human embryonic stem cells differentiating to cardiomyocytes.

Authors:  Abdelaziz Beqqali; Jantine Kloots; Dorien Ward-van Oostwaard; Christine Mummery; Robert Passier
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 6.277

8.  Characterization and in vitro differentiation potential of a new human embryonic stem cell line, ReliCellhES1.

Authors:  Arundhati Mandal; Shabari Tipnis; Rajarshi Pal; Geeta Ravindran; Bipasha Bose; Ameet Patki; Mahendra S Rao; Aparna Khanna
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.880

9.  Transforming growth factor-beta in the early mouse embryo: implications for the regulation of muscle formation and implantation.

Authors:  H G Slager; W Van Inzen; E Freund; A J Van den Eijnden-Van Raaij; C L Mummery
Journal:  Dev Genet       Date:  1993

10.  Unique gene expression signatures of independently-derived human embryonic stem cell lines.

Authors:  Michael J Abeyta; Amander T Clark; Ryan T Rodriguez; Megan S Bodnar; Renee A Reijo Pera; Meri T Firpo
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2004-01-28       Impact factor: 6.150

View more
  8 in total

1.  Differentiation of human ES cell line KIND-2 to yield tripotent cardiovascular progenitors.

Authors:  Harsha Pawani; Punam Nagvenkar; Prasad Pethe; Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.416

2.  Stem cells, progenitors & regenerative medicine: A retrospection.

Authors:  Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 3.  Stem cells to replace or regenerate the diabetic pancreas: Huge potential & existing hurdles.

Authors:  Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.375

4.  Shifting gears from embryonic to very small embryonic-like stem cells for regenerative medicine.

Authors:  Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 2.375

5.  Evaluating KIND1 human embryonic stem cell-derived pancreatic progenitors to ameliorate streptozotocin-induced diabetes in mice.

Authors:  Varsha Pursani; Sona Kapoor; S M Metkari; Prabha Nair; Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.375

6.  Feeder & basic fibroblast growth factor-free culture of human embryonic stem cells: Role of conditioned medium from immortalized human feeders.

Authors:  Pooja Teotia; Shilpa Sharma; Balram Airan; Sujata Mohanty
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 7.  Pluripotent stem cells for cardiac regeneration: overview of recent advances & emerging trends.

Authors:  Harsha Pawani; Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Polycomb group protein expression during differentiation of human embryonic stem cells into pancreatic lineage in vitro.

Authors:  Prasad Pethe; Punam Nagvenkar; Deepa Bhartiya
Journal:  BMC Cell Biol       Date:  2014-05-24       Impact factor: 4.241

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.