Literature DB >> 23288346

A systematic review of elastography, electrical impedance scanning, and digital infrared thermography for breast cancer screening and diagnosis.

Thomas D Vreugdenburg1, Cameron D Willis, Linda Mundy, Janet E Hiller.   

Abstract

The objective of this study aimed to systematically identify and evaluate all the available evidence of safety, effectiveness and diagnostic accuracy for three emerging classes of technology promoted for breast cancer screening and diagnosis: Digital infrared thermal imaging (DITI), electrical impedance scanning (EIS) and elastography. A systematic search of seven biomedical databases (EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, CRD, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Current Contents Connect) was conducted through March 2011, along with a manual search of reference lists from relevant studies. The principal outcome measures were safety, effectiveness, and diagnostic accuracy. Data were extracted using a standardised form, and validated for accuracy by the secondary authors. Study quality was appraised using the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies tool, while heterogeneity was assessed using forest plots, Cooks' distance and standardised residual scatter plots, and I (2) statistics. From 6,808 search results, 267 full-text articles were assessed, of which 60 satisfied the inclusion criteria. No effectiveness studies were identified. Only one EIS screening accuracy study was identified, while all other studies involved symptomatic populations. Significant heterogeneity was present among all device classes, limiting the potential for meta-analyses. Sensitivity and specificity varied greatly for DITI (Sens 0.25-0.97, Spec 0.12-0.85), EIS (Sens 0.26-0.98, Spec 0.08-0.81) and ultrasound elastography (Sens 0.35-1.00, Spec 0.21-0.99). It is concluded that there is currently insufficient evidence to recommend the use of these technologies for breast cancer screening. Moreover, the high level of heterogeneity among studies of symptomatic women limits inferences that may be drawn regarding their use as diagnostic tools. Future research employing standardised imaging, research and reporting methods is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23288346     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-012-2393-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  19 in total

1.  Infrared Imaging Tools for Diagnostic Applications in Dermatology.

Authors:  Abhijit Achyut Gurjarpadhye; Mansi Bharat Parekh; Arita Dubnika; Jayakumar Rajadas; Mohammed Inayathullah
Journal:  SM J Clin Med Imaging       Date:  2015-11-20

2.  Accuracy and Reliability of Infrared Thermography in Assessment of the Breasts of Women Affected by Cancer.

Authors:  Rinaldo Roberto de Jesus Guirro; Maíta Marade Oliveira Lima Leite Vaz; Lais Mara Siqueira das Neves; Almir Vieira Dibai-Filho; Hélio Humberto Angotti Carrara; Elaine Caldeira de Oliveira Guirro
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 4.460

Review 3.  Breast cancer screening: an evidence-based update.

Authors:  Mackenzie S Fuller; Christoph I Lee; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Med Clin North Am       Date:  2015-03-05       Impact factor: 5.456

4.  Automatic detection of perforator vessels using infrared thermography in reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  Michael Unger; Miriam Markfort; Dirk Halama; Claire Chalopin
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 2.924

5.  Thermal distribution analysis of three-dimensional tumor-embedded breast models with different breast density compositions.

Authors:  Asnida Abd Wahab; Maheza Irna Mohamad Salim; Mohamad Asmidzam Ahamat; Noraida Abd Manaf; Jasmy Yunus; Khin Wee Lai
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 6.  Nanocalorimeters for biomolecular analysis and cell metabolism monitoring.

Authors:  Shuyu Wang; Xiaopeng Sha; Shifeng Yu; Yuliang Zhao
Journal:  Biomicrofluidics       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.800

7.  Nanometre-scale thermometry in a living cell.

Authors:  G Kucsko; P C Maurer; N Y Yao; M Kubo; H J Noh; P K Lo; H Park; M D Lukin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  The role of radiotherapy-resistant stem cells in breast cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Cheikh Menaa; Jian Jian Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Manag       Date:  2013

Review 9.  A Perspective on Fluorescent Nanodiamond Bioimaging.

Authors:  Marco D Torelli; Nicholas A Nunn; Olga A Shenderova
Journal:  Small       Date:  2019-06-19       Impact factor: 13.281

10.  Comparison of the Accuracy of Thermography and Mammography in the Detection of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Ramesh Omranipour; Ali Kazemian; Sadaf Alipour; Masoume Najafi; Mansour Alidoosti; Mitra Navid; Afsaneh Alikhassi; Nasrin Ahmadinejad; Khojasteh Bagheri; Shahrzad Izadi
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 2.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.