Literature DB >> 23288205

ACMG Practice Guideline: lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing.

Scott E Hickey1, Cynthia J Curry, Helga V Toriello.   

Abstract

MTHFR polymorphism testing is frequently ordered by physicians as part of the clinical evaluation for thrombophilia. It was previously hypothesized that reduced enzyme activity of MTHFR led to mild hyperhomocysteinemia which led to an increased risk for venous thromboembolism, coronary heart disease, and recurrent pregnancy loss. Recent meta-analyses have disproven an association between hyperhomocysteinemia and risk for coronary heart disease and between MTHFR polymorphism status and risk for venous t-hromboembolism. There is growing evidence that MTHFR polymorphism testing has minimal clinical utility and, therefore should not be ordered as a part of a routine evaluation for thrombophilia.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23288205     DOI: 10.1038/gim.2012.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Med        ISSN: 1098-3600            Impact factor:   8.822


  31 in total

1.  Frequency and characteristics associated with inherited thrombophilia in patients with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistula.

Authors:  Sara C LaHue; Helen Kim; Ludmila Pawlikowska; Jeffrey Nelson; Daniel L Cooke; Steven W Hetts; Vineeta Singh
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.115

2.  Ethnogeographic prevalence and implications of the 677C>T and 1298A>C MTHFR polymorphisms in US primary care populations.

Authors:  James S Graydon; Karla Claudio; Seth Baker; Mohan Kocherla; Mark Ferreira; Abiel Roche-Lima; Jovaniel Rodríguez-Maldonado; Jorge Duconge; Gualberto Ruaño
Journal:  Biomark Med       Date:  2019-06-03       Impact factor: 2.851

Review 3.  Genetic epidemiology of neural tube defects.

Authors:  Philip J Lupo; A J Agopian; Heidi Castillo; Jonathan Castillo; Gerald H Clayton; Nienke P Dosa; Betsy Hopson; David B Joseph; Brandon G Rocque; William O Walker; John S Wiener; Laura E Mitchell
Journal:  J Pediatr Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-12-11

Review 4.  Pre- and post-test genetic counseling for chromosomal and Mendelian disorders.

Authors:  Jill Fonda Allen; Katie Stoll; Barbara A Bernhardt
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.300

Review 5.  Prioritizing genomic applications for action by level of evidence: a horizon-scanning method.

Authors:  W D Dotson; M P Douglas; K Kolor; A C Stewart; M S Bowen; M Gwinn; A Wulf; H M Anders; C Q Chang; M Clyne; T K Lam; S D Schully; M Marrone; W G Feero; M J Khoury
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Genomic Sequencing Expansion and Incomplete Penetrance.

Authors:  Joseph T C Shieh
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  MTHFR: Addressing Genetic Counseling Dilemmas Using Evidence-Based Literature.

Authors:  Brooke Levenseller Levin; Elizabeth Varga
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Signaling pathway genes for blood pressure, folate and cholesterol levels among hypertensives: an epistasis analysis.

Authors:  L K Wei; S Menon; L R Griffiths; S H Gan
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.012

Review 9.  Dizygotic opposite-sex twins with surgically repaired concordant myelomeningocele conceived by in vitro fertilization using intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Sarah Stricker; Cécile Balmer; Raphael Guzman; Jehuda Soleman
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.475

10.  Adult-onset methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency.

Authors:  Daniela Vieira; Cristina Florindo; Isabel Tavares de Almeida; Maria Carmo Macário
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2020-03-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.