PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine whether glucose uptake in viable myocardium of ischemic cardiomyopathy patients depends on rest myocardial blood flow (MBF) and the residual myocardial flow reserve (MFR). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction 25 ± 10 %) were studied with (13)N-ammonia and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Twenty age-matched normals served as controls. Regional MBF was determined at rest and during dipyridamole hyperemia and regional FDG extraction was estimated from regional FDG to (13)N-ammonia activity ratios. RESULTS: Rest MBF was reduced in viable (0.42 ± 0.18 ml/min per g) and nonviable regions (0.32 ± 0.09 ml/min per g) relative to remote regions (0.68 ± 0.23 ml/min per g, p < 0.001) and to normals (0.63 ± 0.13 ml/min per g). Dipyridamole raised MBFs in controls, remote, viable, and nonviable regions. MBFs at rest (p < 0.05) and stress (p < 0.05) in viable regions were significantly higher than that in nonviable regions, while MFRs did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Compared to MFR in remote myocardium, MFRs in viable regions were similar (1.39 ± 0.56 vs 1.70 ± 0.45, p > 0.05) but were significantly lower in nonviable regions (1.23 ± 0.43, p < 0.001). Moreover, the FDG and thus glucose extraction was higher in viable than in remote (1.40 ± 0.14 vs 0.90 ± 0.20, p < 0.001) and in nonviable regions (1.13 ± 0.21, p < 0.001). The extraction of FDG in viable regions was independent of rest MBF but correlated inversely with MFRs (r =-0.424, p < 0.05). No correlation between the FDG extraction and MFR was observed in nonviable regions. CONCLUSION: As in the animal model, decreasing MFRs in viable myocardium are associated with increasing glucose extraction that likely reflects a metabolic adaptation of remodeling hibernating myocytes.
PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to determine whether glucose uptake in viable myocardium of ischemic cardiomyopathypatients depends on rest myocardial blood flow (MBF) and the residual myocardial flow reserve (MFR). METHODS: Thirty-six patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (left ventricular ejection fraction 25 ± 10 %) were studied with (13)N-ammonia and (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET). Twenty age-matched normals served as controls. Regional MBF was determined at rest and during dipyridamolehyperemia and regional FDG extraction was estimated from regional FDG to (13)N-ammonia activity ratios. RESULTS: Rest MBF was reduced in viable (0.42 ± 0.18 ml/min per g) and nonviable regions (0.32 ± 0.09 ml/min per g) relative to remote regions (0.68 ± 0.23 ml/min per g, p < 0.001) and to normals (0.63 ± 0.13 ml/min per g). Dipyridamole raised MBFs in controls, remote, viable, and nonviable regions. MBFs at rest (p < 0.05) and stress (p < 0.05) in viable regions were significantly higher than that in nonviable regions, while MFRs did not differ significantly (p > 0.05). Compared to MFR in remote myocardium, MFRs in viable regions were similar (1.39 ± 0.56 vs 1.70 ± 0.45, p > 0.05) but were significantly lower in nonviable regions (1.23 ± 0.43, p < 0.001). Moreover, the FDG and thus glucose extraction was higher in viable than in remote (1.40 ± 0.14 vs 0.90 ± 0.20, p < 0.001) and in nonviable regions (1.13 ± 0.21, p < 0.001). The extraction of FDG in viable regions was independent of rest MBF but correlated inversely with MFRs (r =-0.424, p < 0.05). No correlation between the FDG extraction and MFR was observed in nonviable regions. CONCLUSION: As in the animal model, decreasing MFRs in viable myocardium are associated with increasing glucose extraction that likely reflects a metabolic adaptation of remodeling hibernating myocytes.
Authors: Christoph Klein; Stephan G Nekolla; Frank M Bengel; Mitsuru Momose; Andrea Sammer; Felix Haas; Bernhard Schnackenburg; Wolfram Delius; Harald Mudra; Dieter Wolfram; Markus Schwaiger Journal: Circulation Date: 2002-01-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: John O Prior; Thomas H Schindler; Alvaro D Facta; Miguel Hernandez-Pampaloni; Roxana Campisi; Magnus Dahlbom; Heinrich R Schelbert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2006-08-11 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: J Tillisch; R Brunken; R Marshall; M Schwaiger; M Mandelkern; M Phelps; H Schelbert Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1986-04-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Thomas H Schindler; Xiao-Li Zhang; John O Prior; Jerson Cadenas; Magnus Dahlbom; James Sayre; Heinrich R Schelbert Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-03-03 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Christophe Depre; Song-Jung Kim; Anna S John; Yanhong Huang; Ornella E Rimoldi; John R Pepper; Gilles D Dreyfus; Vinciane Gaussin; Dudley J Pennell; Dorothy E Vatner; Paolo G Camici; Stephen F Vatner Journal: Circ Res Date: 2004-07-08 Impact factor: 17.367