Literature DB >> 23285597

Prior knowledge, random walks and human skeletal muscle segmentation.

P Y Baudin1, N Azzabou, P G Carlier, Nikos Paragios.   

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a novel approach for segmenting the skeletal muscles in MRI automatically. In order to deal with the absence of contrast between the different muscle classes, we proposed a principled mathematical formulation that integrates prior knowledge with a random walks graph-based formulation. Prior knowledge is represented using a statistical shape atlas that once coupled with the random walks segmentation leads to an efficient iterative linear optimization system. We reveal the potential of our approach on a challenging set of real clinical data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23285597     DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-33415-3_70

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv


  23 in total

1.  Automated muscle segmentation from CT images of the hip and thigh using a hierarchical multi-atlas method.

Authors:  Futoshi Yokota; Yoshito Otake; Masaki Takao; Takeshi Ogawa; Toshiyuki Okada; Nobuhiko Sugano; Yoshinobu Sato
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  A Knowledge-Based Modality-Independent Technique for Concurrent Thigh Muscle Segmentation: Applicable to CT and MR Images.

Authors:  Malihe Molaie; Reza Aghaeizadeh Zoroofi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  Quantifying Abdominal Adipose Tissue and Thigh Muscle Volume and Hepatic Proton Density Fat Fraction: Repeatability and Accuracy of an MR Imaging-based, Semiautomated Analysis Method.

Authors:  Michael S Middleton; William Haufe; Jonathan Hooker; Magnus Borga; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard; Thobias Romu; Patrik Tunón; Gavin Hamilton; Tanya Wolfson; Anthony Gamst; Rohit Loomba; Claude B Sirlin
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Test-retest reliability of automated whole body and compartmental muscle volume measurements on a wide bore 3T MR system.

Authors:  Marianna S Thomas; David Newman; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard; Bahman Kasmai; Richard Greenwood; Paul N Malcolm; Anette Karlsson; Johannes Rosander; Magnus Borga; Andoni P Toms
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Volume measurements of individual muscles in human quadriceps femoris using atlas-based segmentation approaches.

Authors:  Arnaud Le Troter; Alexandre Fouré; Maxime Guye; Sylviane Confort-Gouny; Jean-Pierre Mattei; Julien Gondin; Emmanuelle Salort-Campana; David Bendahan
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2016-03-16       Impact factor: 2.310

6.  Automatic segmentation of all lower limb muscles from high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging using a cascaded three-dimensional deep convolutional neural network.

Authors:  Renkun Ni; Craig H Meyer; Silvia S Blemker; Joseph M Hart; Xue Feng
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2019-12-28

Review 7.  [Myositides: What is the current situation?].

Authors:  K M Rösler; O Scheidegger
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.372

8.  Pixel-based meshfree modelling of skeletal muscles.

Authors:  Jiun-Shyan Chen; Ramya Rao Basava; Yantao Zhang; Robert Csapo; Vadim Malis; Usha Sinha; John Hodgson; Shantanu Sinha
Journal:  Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng Imaging Vis       Date:  2015-06-24

9.  Automatic quadriceps and patellae segmentation of MRI with cascaded U2 -Net and SASSNet deep learning model.

Authors:  Ruida Cheng; Marion Crouzier; François Hug; Kylie Tucker; Paul Juneau; Evan McCreedy; William Gandler; Matthew J McAuliffe; Frances T Sheehan
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2021-11-22       Impact factor: 4.506

10.  Random walks with shape prior for cochlea segmentation in ex vivo μCT.

Authors:  Esmeralda Ruiz Pujadas; Hans Martin Kjer; Gemma Piella; Mario Ceresa; Miguel Angel González Ballester
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 2.924

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.