OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic approach of osteoarthritis (OA) still represents a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of far infrared (FIR) emitting plaster in the treatment of knee OA. DESIGN: This is a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group with equal randomization (1:1), clinical trial. Patients affected by knee OA were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 treatment groups, either placebo plaster or far infrared emitting plaster. Primary endpoint was to assess pain improvement from baseline to 1 months posttreatment in the visual analogue score (VAS). Secondary end point was to evaluate pain score after 1 week of treatment and to compare ultrasonographic findings after 1 month of treatment. RESULTS: Each group comprised 30 (in the FIR group) and 30 (in the placebo group) completers. VAS scores of the placebo and the FIR group were significantly lower at 1 week post-treatment (95% confidence interval CI = -1.14 to 0.31; P<0.05) and at the end of the study (95% confidence interval CI = -2.57 to -0.89; P=0.01). Effect size was -0.43 after one week of treatment and -1.38 after one month of treatment. The mean decrease in VAS values was ≥ 20% in the FIR group. The number of patients from the FIR group with joint effusion was lower (40%) compared to baseline (80%), while no changes were seen among the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Far infrared emitting plaster could be considered an effective non-pharmacological choice for the therapeutic management of knee OA.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic approach of osteoarthritis (OA) still represents a challenge in clinical practice. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of far infrared (FIR) emitting plaster in the treatment of knee OA. DESIGN: This is a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group with equal randomization (1:1), clinical trial. Patients affected by knee OA were randomly allocated to 1 of 2 treatment groups, either placebo plaster or far infrared emitting plaster. Primary endpoint was to assess pain improvement from baseline to 1 months posttreatment in the visual analogue score (VAS). Secondary end point was to evaluate pain score after 1 week of treatment and to compare ultrasonographic findings after 1 month of treatment. RESULTS: Each group comprised 30 (in the FIR group) and 30 (in the placebo group) completers. VAS scores of the placebo and the FIR group were significantly lower at 1 week post-treatment (95% confidence interval CI = -1.14 to 0.31; P<0.05) and at the end of the study (95% confidence interval CI = -2.57 to -0.89; P=0.01). Effect size was -0.43 after one week of treatment and -1.38 after one month of treatment. The mean decrease in VAS values was ≥ 20% in the FIR group. The number of patients from the FIR group with joint effusion was lower (40%) compared to baseline (80%), while no changes were seen among the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Far infrared emitting plaster could be considered an effective non-pharmacological choice for the therapeutic management of knee OA.
Authors: Xi Chen; Hui Zhang; Wu Zeng; Nick Wang; Hang Hong Lo; Chi Kio Ip; Li Jun Yang; W L Wendy Hsiao; Wai Man Sin; Chenglai Xia; Betty Yuen Kwan Law; Vincent Kam Wai Wong Journal: J Adv Res Date: 2021-09-01 Impact factor: 12.822
Authors: Tiago M Coelho; Renan F H Nunes; Fabio Y Nakamura; Rob Duffield; Marília C Serpa; Juliano F da Silva; Lorival J Carminatt; Francisco J Cidral-Filho; Mariana P Goldim; Khiany Mathias; Fabricia Petronilho; Daniel F Martins; Luiz G A Guglielmo Journal: J Sports Sci Med Date: 2021-10-01 Impact factor: 2.988
Authors: I Loturco; Ccc Abad; F Y Nakamura; S P Ramos; R Kobal; S Gil; L A Pereira; Fhp Burini; H Roschel; C Ugrinowitsch; V Tricoli Journal: Biol Sport Date: 2016-07-02 Impact factor: 2.806