Literature DB >> 23284446

Methyl (2E)-2-cyano-3-(dimethyl-amino)-prop-2-enoate.

Rajni Kant1, Vivek K Gupta, Kamini Kapoor, D R Patil, D K Salunkhe, Madhukar B Deshmukh.   

Abstract

In the title compound, C(7)H(10)N(2)O(2), the dimethyl-amino group is twisted slightly relative to the acrylate fragment, forming a dihedral angle of 11.6 (1)°. In the crystal, molecules are linked via pairs of bifurcated C-H/H⋯O hydrogen bonds, forming inversion dimers, which are further connected by C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds into chains along the a-axis direction.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23284446      PMCID: PMC3515226          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812042304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of enamines, see: Huang et al. (2007 ▶); Michael et al. (1999 ▶). For a related structure, see: Gupta et al. (2007 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C7H10N2O2 M = 154.17 Triclinic, a = 7.1102 (5) Å b = 7.8170 (5) Å c = 8.2454 (6) Å α = 97.270 (6)° β = 93.431 (6)° γ = 115.680 (7)° V = 406.31 (5) Å3 Z = 2 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.09 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Sapphire3 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010 ▶) T min = 0.830, T max = 1.000 6682 measured reflections 1593 independent reflections 1126 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.047

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.046 wR(F 2) = 0.134 S = 1.03 1593 reflections 103 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.17 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.13 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 (Farrugia, 1997 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Click here for additional data file. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, New_Global_Publ_Block. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812042304/gk2525sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812042304/gk2525Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536812042304/gk2525Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C7H10N2O2Z = 2
Mr = 154.17F(000) = 164
Triclinic, P1Dx = 1.260 Mg m3
Hall symbol: -P 1Mo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
a = 7.1102 (5) ÅCell parameters from 2720 reflections
b = 7.8170 (5) Åθ = 3.5–29.0°
c = 8.2454 (6) ŵ = 0.09 mm1
α = 97.270 (6)°T = 293 K
β = 93.431 (6)°Block, white
γ = 115.680 (7)°0.3 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm
V = 406.31 (5) Å3
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Sapphire3 diffractometer1593 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1126 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.047
Detector resolution: 16.1049 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.5°
ω scanh = −8→8
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010)k = −9→9
Tmin = 0.830, Tmax = 1.000l = −10→10
6682 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.046Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.134H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.03w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0618P)2 + 0.0587P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1593 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
103 parametersΔρmax = 0.17 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.13 e Å3
Experimental. CrysAlis PRO, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.34.40 (release 27–08-2010 CrysAlis171. NET) (compiled Aug 27 2010,11:50:40) Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
O10.0160 (2)0.6248 (2)0.82511 (17)0.0648 (5)
O20.20619 (19)0.77535 (19)0.63425 (16)0.0535 (4)
C10.1860 (3)0.7109 (2)0.7792 (2)0.0438 (4)
C20.3885 (3)0.7570 (2)0.8695 (2)0.0405 (4)
N10.5414 (2)0.7293 (2)1.13299 (19)0.0475 (4)
N20.7150 (3)0.9493 (3)0.7343 (2)0.0733 (6)
C30.3876 (3)0.7106 (2)1.0252 (2)0.0423 (4)
H30.25520.65671.05990.051*
C40.5009 (3)0.6883 (3)1.2987 (3)0.0666 (6)
H4A0.35250.63651.30510.100*
H4B0.57370.80511.37730.100*
H4C0.54980.59641.32280.100*
C50.7594 (3)0.7984 (3)1.1018 (3)0.0616 (6)
H5A0.76420.74140.99290.092*
H5B0.83460.76331.18130.092*
H5C0.82300.93601.11070.092*
C60.5718 (3)0.8620 (3)0.7958 (2)0.0478 (5)
C70.0158 (3)0.7445 (3)0.5374 (3)0.0611 (6)
H7A−0.07650.60900.51180.092*
H7B0.04910.79500.43710.092*
H7C−0.05240.80900.59880.092*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
O10.0394 (8)0.0845 (10)0.0603 (9)0.0136 (7)0.0073 (7)0.0287 (8)
O20.0476 (8)0.0646 (9)0.0472 (8)0.0215 (6)0.0059 (6)0.0186 (6)
C10.0443 (11)0.0417 (9)0.0417 (10)0.0157 (8)0.0064 (8)0.0071 (7)
C20.0356 (9)0.0396 (9)0.0435 (10)0.0140 (7)0.0079 (8)0.0061 (7)
N10.0395 (8)0.0516 (9)0.0457 (9)0.0151 (7)0.0027 (7)0.0095 (7)
N20.0502 (11)0.0953 (15)0.0766 (13)0.0263 (10)0.0241 (10)0.0380 (11)
C30.0369 (10)0.0385 (9)0.0467 (10)0.0122 (8)0.0069 (8)0.0073 (7)
C40.0583 (13)0.0804 (15)0.0516 (12)0.0205 (11)0.0027 (10)0.0200 (11)
C50.0422 (11)0.0738 (14)0.0650 (14)0.0223 (10)0.0028 (10)0.0140 (11)
C60.0430 (10)0.0534 (11)0.0475 (11)0.0210 (9)0.0086 (9)0.0114 (9)
C70.0567 (13)0.0726 (14)0.0569 (13)0.0298 (11)0.0024 (10)0.0200 (11)
O1—C11.213 (2)C3—H30.9300
O2—C11.346 (2)C4—H4A0.9600
O2—C71.438 (2)C4—H4B0.9600
C1—C21.454 (2)C4—H4C0.9600
C2—C31.377 (2)C5—H5A0.9600
C2—C61.427 (2)C5—H5B0.9600
N1—C31.311 (2)C5—H5C0.9600
N1—C51.455 (2)C7—H7A0.9600
N1—C41.460 (2)C7—H7B0.9600
N2—C61.143 (2)C7—H7C0.9600
C1—O2—C7116.82 (15)N1—C4—H4C109.5
O1—C1—O2122.40 (17)H4A—C4—H4C109.5
O1—C1—C2125.53 (17)H4B—C4—H4C109.5
O2—C1—C2112.07 (15)N1—C5—H5A109.5
C3—C2—C6125.51 (17)N1—C5—H5B109.5
C3—C2—C1117.00 (15)H5A—C5—H5B109.5
C6—C2—C1117.21 (16)N1—C5—H5C109.5
C3—N1—C5124.10 (16)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
C3—N1—C4120.07 (15)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
C5—N1—C4115.77 (16)N2—C6—C2177.6 (2)
N1—C3—C2131.07 (16)O2—C7—H7A109.5
N1—C3—H3114.5O2—C7—H7B109.5
C2—C3—H3114.5H7A—C7—H7B109.5
N1—C4—H4A109.5O2—C7—H7C109.5
N1—C4—H4B109.5H7A—C7—H7C109.5
H4A—C4—H4B109.5H7B—C7—H7C109.5
C7—O2—C1—O12.5 (3)O2—C1—C2—C60.9 (2)
C7—O2—C1—C2−177.56 (15)C5—N1—C3—C2−4.1 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C3−4.8 (3)C4—N1—C3—C2173.00 (19)
O2—C1—C2—C3175.27 (15)C6—C2—C3—N1−8.1 (3)
O1—C1—C2—C6−179.14 (17)C1—C2—C3—N1178.06 (17)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C3—H3···O1i0.932.563.370 (2)146
C4—H4A···O1i0.962.583.415 (3)145
C7—H7C···N2ii0.962.583.535 (3)172
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C3—H3⋯O1i 0.932.563.370 (2)146
C4—H4A⋯O1i 0.962.583.415 (3)145
C7—H7C⋯N2ii 0.962.583.535 (3)172

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  4 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  X-ray crystallographic, spectroscopic and quantum chemical studies on ethyl 2-cyano-3-N ,N-dimethyl amino acrylate.

Authors:  V P Gupta; Archna Sharma
Journal:  Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc       Date:  2006-11-24       Impact factor: 4.098

3.  Efficient synthesis of highly substituted Pyrrolin-4-ones via PIFA-mediated cyclization reactions of enaminones.

Authors:  Jie Huang; Yongjiu Liang; Wei Pan; Yang Yang; Dewen Dong
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2007-11-30       Impact factor: 6.005

4.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  4 in total
  1 in total

1.  2-[(Dimethyl-amino)-methyl-idene]propane-dinitrile.

Authors:  Rajni Kant; Vivek K Gupta; Kamini Kapoor; D R Patil; Madhukar B Deshmukh
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2013-02-23
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.