Literature DB >> 23476604

2-[(Dimethyl-amino)-methyl-idene]propane-dinitrile.

Rajni Kant1, Vivek K Gupta, Kamini Kapoor, D R Patil, Madhukar B Deshmukh.   

Abstract

In the title moleclue, C6H7N3, the mean plane of the dimethyl-amino group [maximum deviation = 0.006 (2) Å] forms a dihedral angle of 7.95 (18)° with the mean plane of the propane-dinitrile fragment [maximum deviation = 0.008 (2) Å]. In the crystal, weak C-H⋯N hydrogen bonds link the mol-ecules into a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 23476604      PMCID: PMC3588480          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813004960

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of enamines, see: Omran et al. (1997 ▶); Saleh et al. (1999 ▶). For related structures, see: Kant et al. (2012 ▶); Karlsen et al. (2002 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

C6H7N3 M = 121.15 Monoclinic, a = 4.0368 (3) Å b = 15.5642 (10) Å c = 10.8500 (7) Å β = 97.488 (6)° V = 675.89 (8) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 0.08 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.3 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Sapphire3 diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010 ▶) T min = 0.637, T max = 1.000 15029 measured reflections 1320 independent reflections 875 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.067

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.066 wR(F 2) = 0.206 S = 1.05 1320 reflections 84 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.23 e Å−3 Δρmin = −0.16 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis PRO (Oxford Diffraction, 2010 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis PRO; data reduction: CrysAlis PRO; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: PLATON. Click here for additional data file. Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813004960/lh5587sup1.cif Click here for additional data file. Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813004960/lh5587Isup2.hkl Click here for additional data file. Supplementary material file. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813004960/lh5587Isup3.cml Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
C6H7N3F(000) = 256
Mr = 121.15Dx = 1.191 Mg m3
Monoclinic, P21/cMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ybcCell parameters from 3950 reflections
a = 4.0368 (3) Åθ = 3.8–29.2°
b = 15.5642 (10) ŵ = 0.08 mm1
c = 10.8500 (7) ÅT = 293 K
β = 97.488 (6)°Block, colourless
V = 675.89 (8) Å30.3 × 0.2 × 0.2 mm
Z = 4
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Sapphire3 diffractometer1320 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube875 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.067
Detector resolution: 16.1049 pixels mm-1θmax = 26.0°, θmin = 3.8°
ω scansh = −4→4
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2010)k = −19→19
Tmin = 0.637, Tmax = 1.000l = −13→13
15029 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.066Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.206H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.05w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.1075P)2 + 0.0919P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1320 reflections(Δ/σ)max = 0.001
84 parametersΔρmax = 0.23 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −0.16 e Å3
Experimental. CrysAlisPro, Oxford Diffraction Ltd., Version 1.171.34.40 (release 27-08-2010 CrysAlis171 .NET) (compiled Aug 27 2010,11:50:40) Empirical absorption correction using spherical harmonics, implemented in SCALE3 ABSPACK scaling algorithm.
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C10.3330 (6)0.77364 (16)0.7562 (2)0.0501 (7)
C20.2937 (6)0.69295 (15)0.7036 (2)0.0510 (7)
H20.16980.69140.62510.061*
N30.4033 (5)0.61815 (13)0.74689 (19)0.0565 (6)
C40.3449 (7)0.54179 (18)0.6690 (3)0.0752 (9)
H4A0.20190.55620.59410.113*
H4B0.24010.49830.71320.113*
H4C0.55420.52060.64830.113*
C50.5891 (7)0.6056 (2)0.8695 (3)0.0726 (9)
H5A0.79390.63770.87590.109*
H5B0.63860.54570.88210.109*
H5C0.45770.62530.93160.109*
C60.5281 (6)0.79802 (16)0.8689 (2)0.0568 (7)
C70.1665 (6)0.84244 (17)0.6873 (2)0.0578 (7)
N80.6838 (6)0.82284 (18)0.9572 (2)0.0805 (8)
N90.0355 (6)0.89864 (16)0.6341 (2)0.0789 (8)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C10.0514 (13)0.0581 (15)0.0392 (13)−0.0003 (11)0.0003 (10)0.0009 (11)
C20.0508 (13)0.0622 (17)0.0391 (13)−0.0035 (11)0.0017 (10)0.0040 (11)
N30.0647 (13)0.0565 (13)0.0466 (13)0.0020 (10)0.0009 (10)0.0064 (10)
C40.090 (2)0.0557 (17)0.077 (2)−0.0048 (14)0.0003 (16)−0.0040 (15)
C50.0853 (19)0.0757 (19)0.0537 (18)0.0151 (15)−0.0032 (14)0.0126 (15)
C60.0573 (15)0.0640 (17)0.0477 (15)0.0020 (12)0.0016 (12)−0.0023 (13)
C70.0643 (16)0.0599 (16)0.0469 (16)−0.0022 (13)−0.0018 (12)−0.0053 (13)
N80.0883 (17)0.0896 (19)0.0576 (16)−0.0012 (14)−0.0125 (13)−0.0126 (14)
N90.0944 (18)0.0635 (15)0.0717 (18)0.0074 (13)−0.0155 (14)0.0030 (14)
C1—C21.380 (3)C4—H4B0.9600
C1—C61.417 (3)C4—H4C0.9600
C1—C71.424 (3)C5—H5A0.9600
C2—N31.311 (3)C5—H5B0.9600
C2—H20.9300C5—H5C0.9600
N3—C51.453 (3)C6—N81.143 (3)
N3—C41.460 (3)C7—N91.139 (3)
C4—H4A0.9600
C2—C1—C6128.4 (2)N3—C4—H4C109.5
C2—C1—C7116.5 (2)H4A—C4—H4C109.5
C6—C1—C7115.0 (2)H4B—C4—H4C109.5
N3—C2—C1130.2 (2)N3—C5—H5A109.5
N3—C2—H2114.9N3—C5—H5B109.5
C1—C2—H2114.9H5A—C5—H5B109.5
C2—N3—C5123.9 (2)N3—C5—H5C109.5
C2—N3—C4119.6 (2)H5A—C5—H5C109.5
C5—N3—C4116.5 (2)H5B—C5—H5C109.5
N3—C4—H4A109.5N8—C6—C1175.8 (3)
N3—C4—H4B109.5N9—C7—C1178.6 (3)
H4A—C4—H4B109.5
C6—C1—C2—N35.6 (4)C1—C2—N3—C52.7 (4)
C7—C1—C2—N3−176.8 (2)C1—C2—N3—C4−176.2 (3)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
C2—H2···N8i0.932.513.399 (4)161
C4—H4B···N9ii0.962.623.569 (4)170
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
C2—H2⋯N8i 0.932.513.399 (4)161
C4—H4B⋯N9ii 0.962.623.569 (4)170

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Methyl (2E)-2-cyano-3-(dimethyl-amino)-prop-2-enoate.

Authors:  Rajni Kant; Vivek K Gupta; Kamini Kapoor; D R Patil; D K Salunkhe; Madhukar B Deshmukh
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-10-13

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.