The crystal structure of durangite, ideally NaAl(AsO(4))F (chemical name sodium aluminium arsenate fluoride), has been determined previously [Kokkoros (1938). Z. Kristallogr.99, 38-49] using Weissenberg film data without reporting displacement parameters of atoms or a reliability factor. This study reports the redetermination of the structure of durangite using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data from a natural sample with composition (Na(0.95)Li(0.05))(Al(0.91)Fe(3+) (0.07)Mn(3+) (0.02))(AsO(4))(F(0.73)(OH)(0.27)) from the type locality, the Barranca mine, Coneto de Comonfort, Durango, Mexico. Durangite is isostructural with minerals of the titanite group in the space group C2/c. Its structure is characterized by kinked chains of corner-sharing AlO(4)F(2) octa-hedra parallel to the c axis. These chains are cross-linked by isolated AsO(4) tetra-hedra, forming a three-dimensional framework. The Na(+) cation (site symmetry 2) occupies the inter-stitial sites and is coordinated by one F(-) and six O(2-) anions. The AlO(4)F(2) octa-hedron has symmetry -1; it is flattened, with the Al-F bond length [1.8457 (4) Å] shorter than the Al-O bond lengths [1.8913 (8) and 1.9002 (9) Å]. Examination of the Raman spectra for arsenate minerals in the titanite group reveals that the position of the band originating from the As-O symmetric stretching vibrations shifts to lower wavenumbers from durangite, maxwellite [ideally NaFe(AsO(4))F], to tilasite [CaMg(AsO(4))F].
The crystal structure of durangite, ideally NaAl(AsO(4))F (chemical name sodium aluminium arsenate fluoride), has been determined previously [Kokkoros (1938). Z. Kristallogr.99, 38-49] using Weissenberg film data without reporting displacement parameters of atoms or a reliability factor. This study reports the redetermination of the structure of durangite using single-crystal X-ray diffraction data from a natural sample with composition (Na(0.95)Li(0.05))(Al(0.91)Fe(3+) (0.07)Mn(3+) (0.02))(AsO(4))(F(0.73)(OH)(0.27)) from the type locality, the Barranca mine, Coneto de Comonfort, Durango, Mexico. Durangite is isostructural with minerals of the titanite group in the space group C2/c. Its structure is characterized by kinked chains of corner-sharing AlO(4)F(2) octa-hedra parallel to the c axis. These chains are cross-linked by isolated AsO(4) tetra-hedra, forming a three-dimensional framework. The Na(+) cation (site symmetry 2) occupies the inter-stitial sites and is coordinated by one F(-) and six O(2-) anions. The AlO(4)F(2) octa-hedron has symmetry -1; it is flattened, with the Al-F bond length [1.8457 (4) Å] shorter than the Al-O bond lengths [1.8913 (8) and 1.9002 (9) Å]. Examination of the Raman spectra for arsenate minerals in the titanite group reveals that the position of the band originating from the As-O symmetric stretching vibrations shifts to lower wavenumbers from durangite, maxwellite [ideally NaFe(AsO(4))F], to tilasite [CaMg(AsO(4))F].
For previous work on durangite, see: Brush (1869 ▶); Des Cloizeaux (1875 ▶); Kokkoros (1938 ▶); Machatschki (1941 ▶); Sumin de Portilla (1974 ▶); Foord et al. (1985 ▶). For minerals isostructural with or similar to durangite, see: Hawthorne (1990 ▶); Groat et al. (1990 ▶); Hawthorne et al. (1991 ▶); Oberti et al. (1991 ▶); Bermanec (1994 ▶); Cooper & Hawthorne (1995 ▶); Troitzsch et al. (1999 ▶); Sebastian et al. (2002 ▶). For Raman spectroscopic measurements on arsenate minerals and compounds, see: Yang et al. (2011a
▶,b
▶); Frost & Xi (2012 ▶); Frost et al. (2012 ▶). For the definition of polyhedral distortion, see: Robinson et al. (1971 ▶).
Bruker APEXII CCD diffractometerAbsorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2005 ▶) T
min = 0.429, T
max = 0.4612509 measured reflections645 independent reflections641 reflections with I > 2σ(I)R
int = 0.019
Refinement
R[F
2 > 2σ(F
2)] = 0.013wR(F
2) = 0.033S = 1.10645 reflections44 parameters3 restraintsH-atom parameters not refinedΔρmax = 0.65 e Å−3Δρmin = −0.47 e Å−3Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XtalDraw (Downs & Hall-Wallace, 2003 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶).Click here for additional data file.Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681204384X/wm2690sup1.cifClick here for additional data file.Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S160053681204384X/wm2690Isup2.hklAdditional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes)
are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken
into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles
and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only
used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic)
treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s.
planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor
wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional
R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for
negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 >
σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc.
and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement.
R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large
as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be
even larger.