Literature DB >> 22199466

Redetermination of eveite, Mn(2)AsO(4)(OH), based on single-crystal X-ray diffraction data.

Yongbo W Yang, Ryan A Stevenson, Alesha M Siegel, Gordon W Downs.   

Abstract

The crystal structure of eveite, ideally Mn(2)(AsO(4))(OH) [dimanganese(II) arsenate(V) hydroxide], was refined from a single crystal selected from a co-type sample from Långban, Filipstad, Varmland, Sweden. Eveite, dimorphic with sarkinite, is structurally analogous with the important rock-forming mineral andalusite, Al(2)OSiO(4), and belongs to the libethenite group. Its structure consists of chains of edge-sharing distorted [MnO(4)(OH)(2)] octa-hedra (..2 symmetry) extending parallel to [001]. These chains are cross-linked by isolated AsO(4) tetra-hedra (..m symmetry) through corner-sharing, forming channels in which dimers of edge-sharing [MnO(4)(OH)] trigonal bipyramids (..m symmetry) are located. In contrast to the previous refinement from Weissenberg photographic data [Moore & Smyth (1968 ▶). Am. Mineral.53, 1841-1845], all non-H atoms were refined with anisotropic displacement param-eters and the H atom was located. The distance of the donor and acceptor O atoms involved in hydrogen bonding is in agreement with Raman spectroscopic data. Examination of the Raman spectra for arsenate minerals in the libethenite group reveals that the position of the peak originating from the O-H stretching vibration shifts to lower wavenumbers from eveite, to adamite, zincolivenite, and olivenite.

Entities:  

Year:  2011        PMID: 22199466      PMCID: PMC3238575          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For background to eveite, see: Moore (1968 ▶); Moore & Smyth (1968 ▶); Hålenius & Westlund (1998 ▶). For other minerals of the libethenite group, see: Hawthorne (1976 ▶); Cordsen (1978 ▶); Toman (1978 ▶); Li et al. (2008 ▶). Correlations between O—H streching frequencies and O—H⋯O donor–acceptor distances were given by Libowitzky (1999 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

Mn2AsO4(OH) M = 265.81 Orthorhombic, a = 8.5478 (16) Å b = 8.7207 (16) Å c = 6.2961 (12) Å V = 469.33 (15) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 12.29 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.05 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm

Data collection

Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2005 ▶) T min = 0.579, T max = 0.639 3315 measured reflections 911 independent reflections 849 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.015

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.021 wR(F 2) = 0.055 S = 1.09 911 reflections 49 parameters All H-atom parameters refined Δρmax = 1.28 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.15 e Å−3 Data collection: APEX2 (Bruker, 2004 ▶); cell refinement: SAINT (Bruker, 2004 ▶); data reduction: SAINT; program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: XtalDraw (Downs & Hall-Wallace, 2003 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: publCIF (Westrip, 2010 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) I, global. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044266/wm2546sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536811044266/wm2546Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
Mn2AsO4(OH)F(000) = 496
Mr = 265.81Dx = 3.762 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PnnmMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2 2nCell parameters from 2202 reflections
a = 8.5478 (16) Åθ = 4–32°
b = 8.7207 (16) ŵ = 12.29 mm1
c = 6.2961 (12) ÅT = 293 K
V = 469.33 (15) Å3Cuboid, pale gray
Z = 40.05 × 0.05 × 0.04 mm
Bruker APEXII CCD area-detector diffractometer911 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube849 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
graphiteRint = 0.015
φ and ω scanθmax = 32.6°, θmin = 4.0°
Absorption correction: multi-scan (SADABS; Sheldrick, 2005)h = −12→5
Tmin = 0.579, Tmax = 0.639k = −13→12
3315 measured reflectionsl = −7→9
Refinement on F2Secondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
Least-squares matrix: fullHydrogen site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.021All H-atom parameters refined
wR(F2) = 0.055w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0327P)2 + 0.4777P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
S = 1.09(Δ/σ)max = 0.005
911 reflectionsΔρmax = 1.28 e Å3
49 parametersΔρmin = −1.15 e Å3
0 restraintsExtinction correction: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008), Fc*=kFc[1+0.001xFc2λ3/sin(2θ)]-1/4
Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methodsExtinction coefficient: 0.0034 (7)
Geometry. All e.s.d.'s (except the e.s.d. in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell e.s.d.'s are taken into account individually in the estimation of e.s.d.'s in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between e.s.d.'s in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell e.s.d.'s is used for estimating e.s.d.'s involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > σ(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
Mn10.00000.00000.24719 (6)0.01052 (10)
Mn20.35839 (4)0.13367 (4)0.50000.01082 (11)
As10.24335 (3)0.25667 (3)0.00000.00735 (9)
O10.3874 (2)0.3726 (2)0.50000.0101 (3)
O20.4144 (2)0.3545 (2)0.00000.0115 (3)
O30.1033 (2)0.3922 (2)0.00000.0171 (4)
O40.22306 (16)0.14338 (15)0.2163 (2)0.0131 (3)
H10.287 (7)0.394 (6)0.50000.042 (14)*
U11U22U33U12U13U23
Mn10.01271 (19)0.01066 (19)0.00818 (18)0.00186 (12)0.0000.000
Mn20.01072 (18)0.00927 (18)0.01247 (18)0.00027 (12)0.0000.000
As10.00733 (13)0.00605 (14)0.00868 (14)−0.00111 (7)0.0000.000
O10.0105 (7)0.0079 (8)0.0119 (8)−0.0004 (6)0.0000.000
O20.0097 (8)0.0141 (9)0.0106 (8)−0.0056 (6)0.0000.000
O30.0099 (8)0.0084 (8)0.0331 (12)0.0015 (6)0.0000.000
O40.0141 (6)0.0143 (6)0.0108 (6)−0.0049 (5)−0.0023 (5)0.0026 (5)
Mn1—O1i2.1406 (13)Mn2—O42.1296 (14)
Mn1—O1ii2.1406 (13)Mn2—O4vi2.1296 (14)
Mn1—O2iii2.1630 (13)Mn2—O3i2.131 (2)
Mn1—O2i2.1630 (13)As1—O31.683 (2)
Mn1—O4iv2.2884 (13)As1—O4vii1.6915 (14)
Mn1—O42.2884 (13)As1—O41.6915 (14)
Mn2—O12.0984 (19)As1—O21.6929 (18)
Mn2—O3v2.106 (2)
O1i—Mn1—O1ii86.72 (7)O1—Mn2—O491.42 (5)
O1i—Mn1—O2iii172.52 (7)O3v—Mn2—O4122.98 (4)
O1ii—Mn1—O2iii94.51 (5)O1—Mn2—O4vi91.42 (5)
O1i—Mn1—O2i94.51 (5)O3v—Mn2—O4vi122.98 (4)
O1ii—Mn1—O2i172.52 (7)O4—Mn2—O4vi114.00 (8)
O2iii—Mn1—O2i85.24 (7)O1—Mn2—O3i164.36 (8)
O1i—Mn1—O4iv91.67 (6)O3v—Mn2—O3i75.00 (9)
O1ii—Mn1—O4iv81.22 (6)O4—Mn2—O3i97.05 (5)
O2iii—Mn1—O4iv95.81 (6)O4vi—Mn2—O3i97.05 (5)
O2i—Mn1—O4iv91.36 (6)O3—As1—O4vii109.72 (6)
O1i—Mn1—O481.22 (6)O3—As1—O4109.72 (6)
O1ii—Mn1—O491.67 (6)O4vii—As1—O4107.26 (9)
O2iii—Mn1—O491.36 (6)O3—As1—O2105.09 (10)
O2i—Mn1—O495.81 (6)O4vii—As1—O2112.51 (6)
O4iv—Mn1—O4170.25 (7)O4—As1—O2112.51 (6)
O1—Mn2—O3v89.37 (8)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
O1—H1···O4viii0.88 (6)2.57 (4)2.885 (2)102 (3)
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

D—H⋯AD—HH⋯ADAD—H⋯A
O1—H1⋯O4i0.88 (6)2.57 (4)2.885 (2)102 (3)

Symmetry code: (i) .

  2 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Redetermination of olivenite from an untwinned single-crystal.

Authors:  Chen Li; Hexiong Yang; Robert T Downs
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2008-08-23
  2 in total
  1 in total

1.  Redetermination of durangite, NaAl(AsO(4))F.

Authors:  Gordon W Downs; Betty N Yang; Richard M Thompson; Michelle D Wenz; Marcelo B Andrade
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2012-10-27
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.