Literature DB >> 23283801

Perceived ownership impacts reward evaluation within medial-frontal cortex.

Olave E Krigolson1, Cameron D Hassall, Lynsey Balcom, David Turk.   

Abstract

Ownership is a powerful construct. Indeed, in a series of recent studies, perceived ownership has been shown to increase attentional capacity, facilitate a memorial advantage, and elicit positive attitudes. Here, we sought to determine whether self-relevance would bias reward evaluation systems within the brain. To accomplish this, we had participants complete a simple gambling task during which they could "win" or "lose" prizes for themselves or for someone else, while electroencephalographic data were recorded. Our results indicated that the amplitude of the feedback error-related negativity, a component of the event-related brain potential sensitive to reward evaluation, was diminished when participants were not gambling for themselves. Furthermore, our data suggest that the ownership cues that indicated who would win or lose a given gamble either were processed as a potential for an increase in utility (i.e., gain: self-gambles) or were processed in a nonutilitarian manner (other-gambles). Importantly, our results suggest that the medial-frontal reward system is sensitive to perceived ownership, to the extent that it may not process changes in utility when they are not directly relevant to self.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23283801     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-012-0144-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.526


  34 in total

1.  Brain potentials associated with expected and unexpected good and bad outcomes.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Clay B Holroyd; Jason S Moser; Robert F Simons
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Decision-making in Blackjack: an electrophysiological analysis.

Authors:  Johannes Hewig; Ralf Trippe; Holger Hecht; Michael G H Coles; Clay B Holroyd; Wolfgang H R Miltner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  It's worse than you thought: the feedback negativity and violations of reward prediction in gambling tasks.

Authors:  Greg Hajcak; Jason S Moser; Clay B Holroyd; Robert F Simons
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 4.016

4.  Event-related brain potentials following incorrect feedback in a time-estimation task: evidence for a "generic" neural system for error detection.

Authors:  W H Miltner; C H Braun; M G Coles
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.225

5.  When "it" becomes "mine": attentional biases triggered by object ownership.

Authors:  David J Turk; Kim van Bussel; Joanne L Brebner; Andreea S Toma; Olav Krigolson; Todd C Handy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Learning to become an expert: reinforcement learning and the acquisition of perceptual expertise.

Authors:  Olav E Krigolson; Lara J Pierce; Clay B Holroyd; James W Tanaka
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  The feedback-related negativity is modulated by feedback probability in observational learning.

Authors:  Stefan Kobza; Patrizia Thoma; Irene Daum; Christian Bellebaum
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2011-08-09       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity.

Authors:  Clay B Holroyd; Michael G H Coles
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain.

Authors:  Nick Yeung; Alan G Sanfey
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-07-14       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  Hierarchical error processing: different errors, different systems.

Authors:  Olav E Krigolson; Clay B Holroyd
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.252

View more
  4 in total

1.  Using brain potentials to understand prism adaptation: the error-related negativity and the P300.

Authors:  Stephane J MacLean; Cameron D Hassall; Yoko Ishigami; Olav E Krigolson; Gail A Eskes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 3.169

2.  Visual Feedback Modulates Aftereffects and Electrophysiological Markers of Prism Adaptation.

Authors:  Jasmine R Aziz; Stephane J MacLean; Olave E Krigolson; Gail A Eskes
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-04-17       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Examining Social Cognition with Embodied Robots: Does Prior Experience with a Robot Impact Feedback-associated Learning in a Gambling Task?

Authors:  Abdulaziz Abubshait; Craig G McDonald; Eva Wiese
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2021-05-31

4.  Distraction Modulates Self-Referential Effects in the Processing of Monetary and Social Rewards.

Authors:  Jia Zhu; Youlong Zhan
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-01-09
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.