Literature DB >> 17469968

The time course of attentional and oculomotor capture reveals a common cause.

Amelia R Hunt1, Adrian von Mühlenen, Alan Kingstone.   

Abstract

Eye movements are often misdirected toward a distractor when it appears abruptly, an effect known as oculomotor capture. Fundamental differences between eye movements and attention have led to questions about the relationship of oculomotor capture to the more general effect of sudden onsets on performance, known as attentional capture. This study explores that issue by examining the time course of eye movements and manual localization responses to targets in the presence of sudden-onset distractors. The results demonstrate that for both response types, the proportion of trials on which responses are erroneously directed to sudden onsets reflects the quality of information about the visual display at a given point in time. Oculomotor capture appears to be a specific instance of a more general attentional capture effect. Differences and similarities between the two types of capture can be explained by the critical idea that the quality of information about a visual display changes over time and that different response systems tend to access this information at different moments in time.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17469968     DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.2.271

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  17 in total

1.  Orienting to threat: faster localization of fearful facial expressions and body postures revealed by saccadic eye movements.

Authors:  Rachel L Bannerman; Maarten Milders; Beatrice de Gelder; Arash Sahraie
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-01-20       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The influence of motivational salience on saccade latencies.

Authors:  Marcus Rothkirch; Florian Ostendorf; Anne-Lene Sax; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The influence of emotional stimuli on the oculomotor system: A review of the literature.

Authors:  Manon Mulckhuyse
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 3.282

4.  The problem of latent attentional capture: Easy visual search conceals capture by task-irrelevant abrupt onsets.

Authors:  Nicholas Gaspelin; Eric Ruthruff; Mei-Ching Lien
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Spatial attention during saccade decisions.

Authors:  Donatas Jonikaitis; Anna Klapetek; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  The comparison of visual working memory representations with perceptual inputs.

Authors:  Joo-seok Hyun; Geoffrey F Woodman; Edward K Vogel; Andrew Hollingworth; Steven J Luck
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Pre-stimulus activity predicts the winner of top-down vs. bottom-up attentional selection.

Authors:  Ali Mazaheri; Nicholas E DiQuattro; Jesse Bengson; Joy J Geng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Oculomotor evidence for top-down control following the initial saccade.

Authors:  Alisha Siebold; Wieske van Zoest; Mieke Donk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Context and competition in the capture of visual attention.

Authors:  Clayton Hickey; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 2.199

10.  The Effects of Feature-Based Priming and Visual Working Memory on Oculomotor Capture.

Authors:  Jeroen D Silvis; Artem V Belopolsky; Jozua W I Murris; Mieke Donk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-11-13       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.