Literature DB >> 23281857

Risk of severe postpartum hemorrhage in low-risk childbearing women in new zealand: exploring the effect of place of birth and comparing third stage management of labor.

Deborah Davis1, Sally Baddock, Sally Pairman, Marion Hunter, Cheryl Benn, Jacqui Anderson, Lesley Dixon, Peter Herbison.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary postpartum hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal mortality and morbidity internationally. Research comparing physiological (expectant) and active management of the third stage of labor favors active management, although studies to date have focused on childbirth within hospital settings, and the skill levels of birth attendants in facilitating physiological third stage of labor have been questioned. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of place of birth on the risk of postpartum hemorrhage and the effect of mode of management of the third stage of labor on severe postpartum hemorrhage.
METHODS: Data for 16,210 low-risk women giving birth in 2006 and 2007 were extracted from the New Zealand College of Midwives research database. Modes of third stage management and volume of blood lost were compared with results adjusted for age, parity, ethnicity, smoking, length of labor, mode of birth, episiotomy, perineal trauma, and newborn birthweight greater than 4,000 g.
RESULTS: In total, 1.32 percent of this low-risk cohort experienced an estimated blood loss greater than 1,000 mL. Place of birth was not found to be associated with risk of blood loss greater than 1,000 mL. More women experienced blood loss greater than 1,000 mL in the active management of labor group for all planned birth places. In this low-risk cohort, those women receiving active management of third stage of labor had a twofold risk (RR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.39-3.22) of losing more than 1,000 mL blood compared with those expelling their placenta physiologically.
CONCLUSIONS: Planned place of birth does not influence the risk of blood loss greater than 1,000 mL. In this low-risk group active management of labor was associated with a twofold increase in blood loss greater than 1,000 mL compared with physiological management. (BIRTH 39:2 June 2012).
© 2012, Copyright the Authors Journal compilation © 2012, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23281857     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536X.2012.00531.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  10 in total

1.  Unexpected complications of low-risk pregnancies in the United States.

Authors:  Valery A Danilack; Anthony P Nunes; Maureen G Phipps
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Factors affecting third-stage management and postpartum hemorrhage in planned midwife-led home and birth center births in the United States.

Authors:  Elise N Erickson; Marit L Bovbjerg; Melissa J Cheyney
Journal:  Birth       Date:  2020-07-29       Impact factor: 3.081

3.  Evaluating Midwifery Units (EMU): a prospective cohort study of freestanding midwifery units in New South Wales, Australia.

Authors:  Amy Monk; Mark Tracy; Maralyn Foureur; Celia Grigg; Sally Tracy
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 2.692

4.  Regional differences in severe postpartum hemorrhage: a nationwide comparative study of 1.6 million deliveries.

Authors:  Babette W Prick; Joost F von Schmidt Auf Altenstadt; Chantal W P M Hukkelhoven; Gouke J Bonsel; Eric A P Steegers; Ben W Mol; Joke M Schutte; Kitty W M Bloemenkamp; Johannes J Duvekot
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-02-21       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  Incidence of immediate postpartum hemorrhages in French maternity units: a prospective observational study (HERA study).

Authors:  Françoise Vendittelli; Chloé Barasinski; Bruno Pereira; Didier Lémery
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Identifying the risk: a prospective cohort study examining postpartum haemorrhage in a regional Australian health service.

Authors:  Lauren Kearney; Mary Kynn; Rachel Reed; Lisa Davenport; Jeanine Young; Keppel Schafer
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-06-07       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Perinatal or neonatal mortality among women who intend at the onset of labour to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Eileen K Hutton; Angela Reitsma; Julia Simioni; Ginny Brunton; Karyn Kaufman
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-07-25

8.  Labouring women who used a birthing pool in obstetric units in Italy: prospective observational study.

Authors:  Jane Henderson; Ethel E Burns; Anna L Regalia; Giovanna Casarico; Mary G Boulton; Lesley A Smith
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-01-14       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Using a peanut ball during labour versus not using a peanut ball during labour for women using an epidural: study protocol for a randomised controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Virginia Stulz; David Campbell; Biing Yin; Wafa Al Omari; Robin Burr; Heather Reilly; Kenny Lawson
Journal:  Pilot Feasibility Stud       Date:  2018-10-04

10.  Maternal outcomes and birth interventions among women who begin labour intending to give birth at home compared to women of low obstetrical risk who intend to give birth in hospital: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Angela Reitsma; Julia Simioni; Ginny Brunton; Karyn Kaufman; Eileen K Hutton
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2020-04-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.