Literature DB >> 23281289

In vivo quantitative assessment of cell viability of gadolinium or iron-labeled cells using MRI and bioluminescence imaging.

Jamal Guenoun1, Alessandro Ruggiero, Gabriela Doeswijk, Roel C Janssens, Gerben A Koning, Gyula Kotek, Gabriel P Krestin, Monique R Bernsen.   

Abstract

In cell therapy, noninvasive monitoring of in vivo cell fate is challenging. In this study we investigated possible differences in R₁, R₂ or R₂* relaxation rate as a measure of overall cell viability for mesenchymal stem cells labeled with Gd-liposomes (Gd-MSCs) or iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO-MSCs). Cells were also transduced with a luciferase vector, facilitating a correlation between MRI findings and cell viability using bioluminescence imaging (BLI). Viable Gd-MSCs were clearly distinguishable from nonviable Gd-MSCs under both in vitro and in vivo conditions, clearly differing quantitatively (ΔR₁ and ΔR₂) as well as by visual appearance (hypo- or hyperintense contrast). Immediately post-injection,viable Gd-MSCs caused a substantially larger ΔR₂ and lower ΔR₁ effect compared with nonviable MSCs. With time, the ΔR₁ and ΔR₂ relaxation rate showed a good negative correlation with increasing cell number following proliferation. Upon injection, no substantial quantitative or visual differences between viable and nonviable SPIO-MSCs were detected. Moreover, nonviable SPIO-MSCs caused a persisting signal void in vivo, compromising the specificity of this contrast agent. In vivo persistence of SPIO particles was confirmed by histological staining. A large difference was found between SPIO- and Gd-labeled cells in the accuracy of MR relaxometry in assessing the cell viability status. Gd-liposomes provide a more accurate and specific assessment of cell viability than SPIO particles. Viable Gd cells can be differentiated from nonviable Gd cells even by visual interpretation. These findings clearly indicate Gd to be the favourable contrast agent in qualitative and quantitative evaluation of labeled cell fate in future cell therapy experiments.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23281289     DOI: 10.1002/cmmi.1513

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contrast Media Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1555-4309            Impact factor:   3.161


  17 in total

1.  Characterization of Magneto-Endosymbionts as MRI Cell Labeling and Tracking Agents.

Authors:  Kimberly D Brewer; Ryan Spitler; Kayla R Lee; Andrea C Chan; Joyce C Barrozo; Abdul Wakeel; Chandler S Foote; Steven Machtaler; James Rioux; Juergen K Willmann; Papia Chakraborty; Bradley W Rice; Christopher H Contag; Caleb B Bell; Brian K Rutt
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Shrinkage-mediated imaging of entire organs and organisms using uDISCO.

Authors:  Chenchen Pan; Ruiyao Cai; Francesca Paola Quacquarelli; Alireza Ghasemigharagoz; Athanasios Lourbopoulos; Paweł Matryba; Nikolaus Plesnila; Martin Dichgans; Farida Hellal; Ali Ertürk
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  Impacts of fluorescent superparamagnetic iron oxide (SPIO)-labeled materials on biological characteristics and osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs).

Authors:  Guangping Zhang; Zhenwen Na; Bin Ren; Xin Zhao; Weixian Liu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

Review 4.  Diamagnetic chemical exchange saturation transfer (diaCEST) liposomes: physicochemical properties and imaging applications.

Authors:  Kannie W Y Chan; Jeff W M Bulte; Michael T McMahon
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2013-10-08

5.  Iron administration before stem cell harvest enables MR imaging tracking after transplantation.

Authors:  Aman Khurana; Fanny Chapelin; Graham Beck; Olga D Lenkov; Jessica Donig; Hossein Nejadnik; Solomon Messing; Nikita Derugin; Ray Chun-Fai Chan; Amitabh Gaur; Barbara Sennino; Donald M McDonald; Paul J Kempen; Grigory A Tikhomirov; Jianghong Rao; Heike E Daldrup-Link
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-07-12       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  DNA-gadolinium-gold nanoparticles for in vivo T1 MR imaging of transplanted human neural stem cells.

Authors:  Francesca J Nicholls; Matthew W Rotz; Harmanvir Ghuman; Keith W MacRenaris; Thomas J Meade; Michel Modo
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2015-11-14       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 7.  Nanoparticles and clinically applicable cell tracking.

Authors:  Monique R Bernsen; Jamal Guenoun; Sandra T van Tiel; Gabriel P Krestin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 3.629

8.  Mapping Cell Viability Quantitatively and Independently From Cell Density in 3D Gels Noninvasively.

Authors:  Brian J Archer; Julia J Mack; Sara Acosta; Russell Nakasone; Fadi Dahoud; Khalid Youssef; Abraham Goldstein; Amichai Goldsman; Mathias C Held; Martin Wiese; Bernhard Blumich; Matthias Wessling; Meike Emondts; Jurgen Klankermayer; M Luisa Iruela-Arispe; Louis-S Bouchard
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 4.756

Review 9.  Tracking Transplanted Stem Cells Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and the Nanoparticle Labeling Method in Urology.

Authors:  Jae Heon Kim; Hong J Lee; Yun Seob Song
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-08-27       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  Imaging transplanted stem cells in real time using an MRI dual-contrast method.

Authors:  Ethel J Ngen; Lee Wang; Yoshinori Kato; Balaji Krishnamachary; Wenlian Zhu; Nishant Gandhi; Barbara Smith; Michael Armour; John Wong; Kathleen Gabrielson; Dmitri Artemov
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.