Literature DB >> 23281281

Patient-specific modelling of bone and bone-implant systems: the challenges.

Pankaj Pankaj1.   

Abstract

In the past three decades, finite element (FE) modelling has provided considerable understanding to the area of musculoskeletal biomechanics. However, most of this understanding has been generated using generic, standardised or idealised models. Patient-specific modelling (PSM) is almost never used for making clinical decisions. Imaging technologies have made it possible to create patient-specific geometries and FE meshes for modelling. While these have brought us closer to PSM, several challenges associated with the definition of material properties, loads, boundary conditions and interaction between components still need to be overcome. This study reviews the current status of PSM with respect to defining material behaviour and prescribing boundary conditions and interactions. With regard to the constitutive modelling of bone, it is seen that imaging is being increasingly used to define elastic properties (isotropic as well as anisotropic). However, the post-elastic and time-dependent behaviour, important for several modelling situations, is mostly obtained from in vitro experiments. Strain-based plasticity, not commonly available in FE codes, appears to have the potential of reducing an element of patient-specificity in modelling the yielding behaviour of bone. PSM of real boundary conditions that include muscles and ligaments continues to remain a challenge; many clinically relevant questions can be, however, answered without their inclusion. Simulation techniques to undertake PSM of interactions between bone and uncemented implants are available. Interference fit employed in both joint replacement fracture treatments induces considerable preload whose inclusion in models is important for the prediction of interface behaviour.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23281281     DOI: 10.1002/cnm.2536

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng        ISSN: 2040-7939            Impact factor:   2.747


  10 in total

1.  Toward an artificial intelligence-assisted framework for reconstructing the digital twin of vertebra and predicting its fracture response.

Authors:  Hossein Ahmadian; Prasath Mageswaran; Benjamin A Walter; Dukagjin M Blakaj; Eric C Bourekas; Ehud Mendel; William S Marras; Soheil Soghrati
Journal:  Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng       Date:  2022-04-26       Impact factor: 2.648

2.  Effect of including damage at the tissue level in the nonlinear homogenisation of trabecular bone.

Authors:  Francesc Levrero-Florencio; Krishnagoud Manda; Lee Margetts; Pankaj Pankaj
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2017-05-12

3.  Time Dependent Behaviour of Trabecular Bone at Multiple Load Levels.

Authors:  Shuqiao Xie; Krishnagoud Manda; Robert J Wallace; Francesc Levrero-Florencio; A Hamish R W Simpson; Pankaj Pankaj
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.934

4.  Metaphyseal cones in revision total knee arthroplasty: The role of stems.

Authors:  Shuqiao Xie; Noel Conlisk; David Hamilton; Chloe Scott; Richard Burnett; Pankaj Pankaj
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2020-05-16       Impact factor: 5.853

5.  Time-dependent behaviour of bone accentuates loosening in the fixation of fractures using bone-screw systems.

Authors:  S Xie; K Manda; P Pankaj
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-11-03       Impact factor: 5.853

Review 6.  Finite Element Analysis of Fracture Fixation.

Authors:  Gregory S Lewis; Dominic Mischler; Hwabok Wee; J Spence Reid; Peter Varga
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 5.163

7.  Initial Stability of Subtrochanteric Oblique Osteotomy in Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Preliminary Finite Element Study.

Authors:  Liangtao Li; Mingyang Yu; Renshi Ma; Dong Zhu; Guishan Gu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-07-08

8.  Linear viscoelasticity - bone volume fraction relationships of bovine trabecular bone.

Authors:  Krishnagoud Manda; Shuqiao Xie; Robert J Wallace; Francesc Levrero-Florencio; Pankaj Pankaj
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2016-04-18

9.  Application of quality by design for 3D printed bone prostheses and scaffolds.

Authors:  Daniel Martinez-Marquez; Ali Mirnajafizadeh; Christopher P Carty; Rodney A Stewart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Using Non-linear Homogenization to Improve the Performance of Macroscopic Damage Models of Trabecular Bone.

Authors:  Francesc Levrero-Florencio; Pankaj Pankaj
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 4.566

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.