Literature DB >> 23281093

Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with MR cholangiography for the preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer.

Hye Young Sun1, Jeong Min Lee, Hee Sun Park, Jeong Hee Yoon, Jee Hyun Baek, Joon Koo Han, Byung Ihn Choi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of gadoxetic acid-enhanced biliary MRI with MR cholangiography (MRC) in the preoperative evaluation of bile duct cancer (BDC) staging and resectability.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-three patients with BDC who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced biliary MRI and MRC, were included in this study. Two abdominal radiologists evaluated the biliary MRI findings regarding the tumor extent, vascular involvement, lymph node metastasis, and tumor resectability. The results were compared with the surgical and pathology findings which were used as the standard reference. The diagnostic performance of the MRI was evaluated using receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. In addition, to determine whether the hepatobiliary phase images had been successfully obtained, the enhancement percentage of the hepatic parenchyma was measured on the portal venous images (PVI) and hepatobiliary phase images (HBPI), respectively.
RESULTS: The overall accuracy of the two reviewers for determining the tumor resectability was 61.6% and 83.5%, respectively. The Az values were 0.802 for reviewer 1 and 0.892 for reviewer 2 in the evaluation of the secondary biliary confluence tumor involvement and 0.773 for reviewer 1 and 0.846 for reviewer 2 in the evaluation of the intrapancreatic bile duct involvement. In the evaluation of the vascular involvement, the Az values were 0.718 and 0.906, respectively, for the hepatic artery evaluation and 0.55 and 0.88, respectively, for the portal vein evaluation. For assessment of lymph node metastasis, the overall accuracy was 69.6% and 79.7%, respectively. The mean enhancement percentages of hepatic parenchyma on PVI and HBPI were 39.3% and 65.9%, respectively (P % 0.05), and 49 of 73 patients (67.1%) showed higher enhancement percentage on HBPI than on PVI
CONCLUSION: Gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI with MRC is a reliable diagnostic method for assessing the tumor extent and resectability of BDC.
Copyright © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI with MR cholangiography; bile duct cancer; gadoxetic acid

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23281093     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.23957

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  8 in total

1.  Added value of gadoxetic acid-enhanced T1-weighted magnetic resonance cholangiography for the diagnosis of post-transplant biliary complications.

Authors:  Sonja Kinner; Tilman B Schubert; Adnan Said; Joshua D Mezrich; Scott B Reeder
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance, computed tomography and contrast enhanced ultrasound in radiological multimodality assessment of peribiliary liver metastases.

Authors:  Vincenza Granata; Roberta Fusco; Orlando Catalano; Antonio Avallone; Raffaele Palaia; Gerardo Botti; Fabiana Tatangelo; Francesco Granata; Marco Cascella; Francesco Izzo; Antonella Petrillo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-06-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Radiologic Evaluation and Structured Reporting Form for Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer: 2019 Consensus Recommendations from the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee; Bohyun Kim; Eun Sun Lee; Hyoung Jung Kim; Ji Hye Min; Jeong Min Lee; Moon Hyung Choi; Nieun Seo; Sang Hyun Choi; Seong Hyun Kim; Seung Soo Lee; Yang Shin Park; Yong Eun Chung
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 3.500

4.  Total Bilirubin Level as a Predictor of Suboptimal Image Quality of the Hepatobiliary Phase of Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Patients with Extrahepatic Bile Duct Cancer.

Authors:  Jeong Ah Hwang; Ji Hye Min; Seong Hyun Kim; Seo-Youn Choi; Ji Eun Lee; Ji Yoon Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-01-04       Impact factor: 3.500

Review 5.  [Current Status and Recent Update of Imaging Evaluation for Peri-Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma].

Authors:  Dong Ho Lee
Journal:  Taehan Yongsang Uihakhoe Chi       Date:  2021-03-31

Review 6.  Liver-specific agents for contrast-enhanced MRI: role in oncological imaging.

Authors:  Yee Liang Thian; Angela M Riddell; Dow-Mu Koh
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.909

Review 7.  Practical review for diagnosis and clinical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Daniele Dondossola; Michele Ghidini; Francesco Grossi; Giorgio Rossi; Diego Foschi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and 18-fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the diagnostic accuracy of staging in patients with cholangiocarcinoma: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xujian Huang; Jialin Yang; Jingdong Li; Yongfu Xiong
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.