Literature DB >> 23280887

Development of a hypersensitive periodate-cleavable amino acid that is methionine- and disulfide-compatible and its application in MHC exchange reagents for T cell characterisation.

Alessia Amore1, Kim Wals, Evelyn Koekoek, Rieuwert Hoppes, Mireille Toebes, Ton N M Schumacher, Boris Rodenko, Huib Ovaa.   

Abstract

Incorporation of cleavable linkers into <span class="Chemical">peptides and proteins is of particular value in the study of biological processes. Here we describe the <ass="Gene">span class="Gene">synthesis of a cleavable linker that is hypersensitive to oxidative cleavage as the result of the periodate reactivity of a vicinal amino alcohol moiety. Two strategies directed towards the synthesis of a building block suitable for solid-phase peptide synthesis were developed: a chemoenzymatic route, involving L-threonine aldolase, and an enantioselective chemical route; these led to α,γ-diamino-β-hydroxybutanoic acids in diastereoisomerically mixed and enantiopure forms, respectively. Incorporation of the 1,2-amino alcohol linker into the backbone of a peptide generated a conditional peptide that was rapidly cleaved at very low concentrations of sodium periodate. This cleavable peptide ligand was applied in the generation of MHC exchange reagents for the detection of antigen-specific T cells in peripheral blood cells. The extremely low concentration of periodate required to trigger MHC peptide exchange allowed the co-oxidation of methionine and disulfide residues to be avoided. Conditional MHC reagents hypersensitive to periodate can now be applied without limitations when UV irradiation is undesired or less practical.
Copyright © 2013 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23280887      PMCID: PMC3561698          DOI: 10.1002/cbic.201200540

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chembiochem        ISSN: 1439-4227            Impact factor:   3.164


Introduction

Cleavable linkers are key tools in many fields of biology, ranging from proteomics and protein purification to structural biology. The development of linkers that can be cleaved under biocompatible reaction conditions is a challenge for chemists. A high cleavage rate, efficiency and selectivity are desired, but protein structure and function must not be compromised. This demands mild cleavage conditions in an environment that is dictated by the application (physiological or biochemical, in vivo or in vitro, reducing or pH-neutral, for example). A cleavable linker that can replace an amino acid residue in the backbone of a (poly)peptide or protein will allow cleavage of the backbone into at least two fragments upon application of a defined trigger, but will require accessibility of the cleavage site to the trigger. To date, various cleavable moieties that can be cleaved by photoirradiation, enzymes, nucleophilic or electrophilic reagents and reducing or oxidizing reagents have been developed for incorporation into the backbones of <span class="Chemical">peptides or proteins.1 Although photocleavable linkers are widely used, UV irradiation has several drawbacks, such as 1) the uncontrolled increase in temperature and concomitant evaporation of medium or buffer that can be caused by the heat generated by a UV lamp, 2) incomplete cleavage due to limited penetration of UV light into the sample medium, and 3) uneven UV exposure of wells in microtiter plates in high-throughput screening applications, leading to distorted assay results. A chemical trigger circumvents these problems, is readily available, can be added and quenched in a controlled fashion and under sterile conditions and does not require special laboratory equipment such as a UV lamp. Linkers that can be cleaved under mild oxidative conditions have an advantage over linkers sensitive to reductive conditions: they allow preservation of <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">disulfide bonds and hence protein structure. The <span class="Chemical">vicinal diol moiety has been used as an oxidation-sensitive linker1 and is cleaved by the mild oxidant <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">sodium periodate to yield two aldehyde fragments. Periodate-mediated diol cleavage is a mild and biocompatible reaction, but it has one major drawback: complete cleavage of a diol linkage requires periodate concentrations in the millimolar range and incubation times of the order of hours. This invariably leads to co-oxidation of cysteine and methionine residues.2 Such co-oxidations can affect protein function and protein–ligand and/or protein–protein interactions.3 We decided to develop a biocompatible, cleavable linker that would be amenable to incorporation into a (poly)peptide backbone and would also be <span class="Disease">hypersensitive to <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">periodate oxidation, allowing selective cleavage, but without unwanted co-oxidation reactions. The periodate-mediated cleavage rate of a vicinal amino alcohol is reportedly 1000 times higher than that of a vicinal diol,4 so we aimed at the generation of a linker system containing a 1,2-amino alcohol fragment as shown in Scheme 1. Here we present the synthesis and stringent evaluation of this linker in a biological system in which the prevention of methionine oxidation is of critical importance: the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I–antigenic peptide–T-cell receptor interaction. Major histocompatibility class I complexes present peptide antigens at the cell surface for surveillance by cytotoxic T cells, forming the basis for a subsequent antigen-specific cytotoxic T cell response. T-cell receptors recognise the composite surface of the antigenic peptide-MHC class I complex (pMHC). Small changes in this surface, such as oxidation of a methionine residue in the antigenic peptide, result in distorted interaction with the T-cell receptor, and this has led to impaired T cell staining with use of MHC tetramers5 generated by MHC exchange reactions.6 We show that the vicinal amino alcohol linker developed here circumvents these co-oxidation issues in MHC exchange technology, which has become a standard tool for immunologists monitoring T cell specificities in a high-throughput fashion.
Scheme 1

An α,γ-diamino-β-hydroxybutanoic acid (DAHB) residue incorporated into a peptide backbone is cleaved by NaIO4 much more rapidly than a γ-amino-α,β-dihydroxybutanoic acid residue.

An α,γ-diamino-β-hydroxybutanoic acid (<span class="Chemical">DAHB) residue incorporated into a peptide backbone is cleaved by <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">NaIO4 much more rapidly than a γ-amino-α,β-dihydroxybutanoic acid residue.

Results

Chemoenzymatic synthesis of 1,2-amino-alcohol-containing β-amino acids

Although various <span class="Gene">synthetic routes for the preparation of <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">vicinal amino alcohols—such as oxyamination7 or dihydroxylation8 of olefins, ring opening of aziridine9 and enzymatic processes10—have been developed, none of them allows incorporation of a vicinal amino alcohol group in the main carbon chain, so they are unsuited as synthetic approaches to the preparation of a backbone-cleavable amino acid residue. To generate the amino acid residue α,γ-diamino-β-hydroxybutanoic acid (DAHB), suitable for solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), we used two different approaches: a biocatalytic route that gives the desired vicinal amino alcohol moiety in only few steps as a mixture of diastereoisomers [(2S,3R)- and (2S,3S)-DAHB] and, alternatively, a chemical route that requires more synthetic steps, but allows easy scale-up and furnishes only one diastereoisomer [(2S,3R)-DAHB]. Furthermore, to allow for easy incorporation in the backbone of a peptide ligand by automated solid-phase synthesis, we included orthogonal protective groups in the design of functionalised DAHB building blocks. The chemoenzymatic approach involved the application of an aldol reaction catalysed by recombinant l-threonine aldolase (LTA) from Pseudomonas putida (Scheme 2). This aldolase catalyses aldol condensations between glycine and appropriate aldehydes, with formation of C–C bonds with high stereoselectivity at the α-carbons to give the l-epimers. Although LTA from Pseudomonas putida is known to render modest enantioselectivity at the β-carbon chiral centres, we selected this enzyme for its tolerance of a broad range of aldehydes.10a, 11 LTA from P. putida was cloned and expressed in E. coli, and lysate containing LTA was used without further purification (Figure S1 in the Supporting Information). We studied the efficiency of the biocatalysed reaction with 2-aminoacetaldehyde bearing Fmoc (compound 1 a) or Alloc (compound 1 b) as N-protecting groups; these compounds were easily prepared by literature procedures.12 Enzymatic aldol condensations were performed at room temperature in aqueous phosphate buffer, with 2.7 equivalents of glycine and catalytic amounts of pyridoxal-5′-phosphate as the cofactor. The reactions were monitored by TLC and LC-MS and quenched by addition of CH3OH/AcOH (9:1, v/v) to avoid retroaldol reactions. Solubilisation of starting material 1 a required addition of DMSO (12 %) to the reaction mixture. After purification over a solid-phase extraction column, amino alcohol 2 a was obtained in 10 % yield. The presence of the organic solvent seemed to affect the efficiency of the enzymatic reaction: when N-Alloc-protected 1 b was used as the aldehyde component, DMSO was not required for its solubilisation and the reaction proceeded smoothly in phosphate buffer to give 2 b in good yield (50 %) after flash chromatography.
Scheme 2

Chemoenzymatic synthesis of l-DAHB building blocks for SPPS. a) LTA lysate, glycine (2.7 equiv), pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (0.025 equiv), RT, 3–16 h, 10 % for 2 a and 50 % for 2 b; b) (Boc)2O (1.1 equiv), NaHCO3 (2 equiv), H2O/dioxane, 53 % for 3 a and 40 % for 3 b.

Chemoenzymatic <span class="Gene">synthesis of <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">l-DAHB building blocks for SPPS. a) LTA lysate, glycine (2.7 equiv), pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (0.025 equiv), RT, 3–16 h, 10 % for 2 a and 50 % for 2 b; b) (Boc)2O (1.1 equiv), NaHCO3 (2 equiv), H2O/dioxane, 53 % for 3 a and 40 % for 3 b. Next, the Nα atoms in 2 a and 2 b were protected with acid-labile Boc groups for subsequent use in Fmoc-based SPPS; <span class="Chemical">l-DAHB derivatives 3 a and 3 b were obtained in 53 and 40 % yields, respectively. Maintaining the pH between 8 and 9 during the Boc protection step was essential to avoid retroaldol reactions, which are favoured at pH>9. The peaks of the <ass="Gene">span class="Gene">syn and anti isomers of 3 a were discernible by HPLC and the syn/anti ratio was 40:60 (Figure S2), a typical diastereomeric ratio for aldol reactions catalysed by P. putida LTA.13 For products 2 a, 2 b and 3 b the syn and anti isomers were not resolved by HPLC, and their diastereomeric ratios could not be determined. Protection of the β-hydroxy groups was not necessary, because O-acylation does not occur with use of PyBop as the coupling reagent in standard Fmoc-based SPPS.

Enantioselective synthesis of a β-amino acid containing a 1,2-amino alcohol system

The diastereoisomers of building blocks 3 obtained by the chemoenzymatic route were difficult to separate. In order to study the requirement for diastereoselectivity with regard to the <span class="Chemical">periodate susceptibility of an <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">amino alcohol moiety conformationally restrained in a peptide, we developed an alternative, enantioselective route to building blocks containing vicinal amino alcohol systems; this additionally gave access to different and orthogonal protective groups and allowed for easy scale-up (Scheme 3). Isopropylidene-protected vicinal diol 43b was treated with TFA in a THF/H2O mixture to furnish diol 5, which, after solvent evaporation, was immediately taken up in methanol containing a catalytic amount of HCl to furnish the corresponding methyl ester 6 in 77 % yield. Treatment of diol 6 with thionyl chloride and triethylamine at 0 °C then gave sulfite 7 in 80 % yield. Direct ring opening of the sulfite was unsuccessful, so compound 7 was oxidized with NaIO4 and a catalytic amount of RuCl3⋅x H2O to afford sulfate 8 in 80 % yield. Nucleophilic ring opening of 8 with sodium azide was performed in an acetone/water mixture at room temperature to provide azido alcohol 9 in 64 % yield after column chromatography. Finally, mild hydrolysis with trimethyltin hydroxide14 furnished the desired masked amino alcohol building block 10—in which the α-amino group was masked as an azide, to be reduced after incorporation into the peptide—in 68 % yield and as the single l-syn isomer.
Scheme 3

Enantioselective synthesis of a masked DAHB building block for SPPS. Reagents and conditions: a) TFA, THF/H2O, 4 h; b) CH3OH, HCl (cat), 65 °C, 6 h, 77 % over two steps; c) SOCl2 (2.2 equiv), Et3N (4.4 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1.5 h, 80 %; d) RuCl3⋅x H2O (0.01 equiv), NaIO4 (2 equiv), CCl4/CH3CN/H2O (1:1:1.2), RT, 1 h, 80 %; e) NaN3 (2 equiv), acetone/H2O, 0 °C→RT, 16 h, 64 %; f) Me3SnOH, DCE, 82 °C, 3 h, 68 %.

Enantioselective <span class="Gene">synthesis of a masked <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">DAHB building block for SPPS. Reagents and conditions: a) TFA, THF/H2O, 4 h; b) CH3OH, HCl (cat), 65 °C, 6 h, 77 % over two steps; c) SOCl2 (2.2 equiv), Et3N (4.4 equiv), CH2Cl2, 0 °C, 1.5 h, 80 %; d) RuCl3⋅x H2O (0.01 equiv), NaIO4 (2 equiv), CCl4/CH3CN/H2O (1:1:1.2), RT, 1 h, 80 %; e) NaN3 (2 equiv), acetone/H2O, 0 °C→RT, 16 h, 64 %; f) Me3SnOH, DCE, 82 °C, 3 h, 68 %. With building blocks <span class="Gene">syn/anti-3 a/3 b and <ass="Gene">span class="Gene">syn-10 in hand we set out to synthesise a chemocleavable peptide containing an amino alcohol system as a conditional ligand for MHC exchange applications. Reagent accessibility is a key determinant in the efficiency of periodate cleavage and subsequent antigen exchange.3b The crystal structures of human leukocyte antigen-A2.1 (HLA-A2.1) loaded with various viral epitopes,15 including native cytomegalovirus (CMV) pp65(495–503) peptide,16 or NLVJMVATV in which J is a diol residue,3b show that the p4 position is the most solvent-accessible position. We therefore incorporated the masked amino acid residues 3 a, 3 b and 10 at the p4 position in the HLA-A2.1 restricted CMV pp65(495–503) epitope, resulting in NLVBMVATV, in which B designates the amino alcohol residue. By automated Fmoc-based SPPS we generated conditional peptide p*AA both as a syn/anti mixture of diastereomers (termed p*AA) by utilizing syn/anti-3 a/3 b and as a single diastereoisomer (termed p*AA) from syn-10.

Chemosensitivity and MHC exchange reactions

The sensitivity of p*AA towards <span class="Chemical">sodium periodate was studied and compared with that of the <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">diol-containing peptide analogue (termed p*DI). The oxidation-sensitive peptides were subjected to various amounts of NaIO4 and the resulting mixtures were analysed by LC-MS (Figures S3 and S4). Complete cleavage of the hypersensitive p*AA was achieved within 10 min with use of only two equivalents of periodate; as expected, this was much faster and milder than the conditions required for cleavage of p*DI, which required at least 30 equivalents of NaIO4 and 2 h incubation time. Peptide p*AA contains a methionine residue, and we observed that partial methionine oxidation only occurred when p*AA was treated with >3 equiv of NaIO4; this indicates that methionine oxidation was slower than amino alcohol cleavage. We next loaded p*AA or p*AA into the MHC class I peptide binding groove of HLA-A2.1 by a standard refolding procedure.20 Chemocleavage of the conditional peptide lodged in the peptide binding groove should demand accessibility of the <span class="Chemical">amino alcohol moiety to <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">periodate anions, as well as an orientation of the vicinal amino alcohol that sterically allows the formation of the cyclic periodate ester intermediate.17 In view of the constrained conformation of the peptide ligand in the MHC groove, we investigated (by HPLC analysis) whether the loaded ligands p*AA or p*AA would show differential reactivities towards periodate. Treatment of HLA-A2.1::p*AA or HLA-A2.1::p*AA with as little as 10 μm NaIO4 in the presence of a nonbinding HLA-B7 restricted mage-1 epitope resulted in degradation of the conditional MHC complex (p*MHC) as a result of efficient oxidative cleavage (Figure 1 A and B). A peptide exchange experiment with HLA-A2 restricted CMV epitope, triggered by 10 μm NaIO4, resulted in rescue of the MHC complex (Figure 1 C and D). No difference in reactivity between MHC loaded with p*AA or with p*AA was observed, which implied that the conformational restrictions in the MHC peptide binding groove have no appreciable influence on cleavage of the conditional peptide.
Figure 1

Peptide exchange efficiency as monitored by gel filtration HPLC analysis and UV absorbance (230 nm). A) HLA-A2.1::p*AA (0.5 μm) before (solid line) or after treatment with either 10 μm (dashed line) or 30 μm (dotted line) NaIO4 in the presence of 50 μm of nonbinding peptide (HLA-B7 restricted mage-1(289–298) epitope RVRFFFPSL). B) As in A), but with 0.5 μm HLA-A2.1::p*AA. C) Chemo-exchange of 0.5 μm HLA-A2.1::p*AA before (solid line) or after treatment with 10 μm NaIO4 (dashed line) in the presence of 50 μm of rescue peptide (HLA-A2 restricted CMV pp65(495–503) epitope NLVPMVATV). D) As in C), but with 0.5 μm HLA-A2.1::p*AA.

Peptide exchange efficiency as monitored by gel filtration HPLC analysis and UV absorbance (230 nm). A) HLA-A2.1::p*AA (0.5 μm) before (solid line) or after treatment with either 10 μm (dashed line) or 30 μm (dotted line) <span class="Chemical">NaIO4 in the presence of 50 μm of nonbinding peptide (HLA-B7 restricted mage-1(289–298) epitope RVRFFFPSL). B) As in A), but with 0.5 μm HLA-A2.1::p*AA. C) Chemo-exchange of 0.5 μm HLA-A2.1::p*AA before (solid line) or after treatment with 10 μm <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">NaIO4 (dashed line) in the presence of 50 μm of rescue peptide (HLA-A2 restricted CMV pp65(495–503) epitope NLVPMVATV). D) As in C), but with 0.5 μm HLA-A2.1::p*AA.

MHC exchange reactions and T cell characterisation

We used refolded and biotinylated HLA-A2.1::p*AA for MHC exchange reactions and converted these MHC reagents into tetramers by addition of phycoerythrin-conjugated (PE-conjugated) streptavidin. We studied the performance of these hyper-chemosensitive MHC exchange reagents in the detection of antigen-specific T cells in peripheral blood samples by flow cytometry. All exchange reactions mentioned from this point onwards were additionally performed with refolded and biotinylated HLA-A2.1::p*AA; the T cell staining results were similar to those obtained with biotinylated HLA-A2.1::p*AA (Supporting Information). This confirms that diastereomeric purity of the <span class="Chemical">amino alcohol component is not a requirement for efficient MHC peptide exchange reactions. Peptide exchange reactions with HLA-A2.1::p*AA were triggered by the addition of only 10 μm <span class="Chemical">NaIO4, a concentration 30 times lower than that required with <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">diol-based HLA-A2.1::p*DI. We observed that periodate-exchanged MHC tetramers containing influenza epitope GILGFVFTL stain low-frequency influenza epitope-specific T cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from a healthy individual as efficiently as photo-exchanged MHC class I tetramers (Figure 2 A and Figure S8). Importantly, hypersensitive periodate-exchanged tetramers containing CMV epitope NLVPMVATV stain low-magnitude PBMCs from an HLA-A2.1-positive individual very efficiently, which implies that methionine oxidation, which would hamper interaction with the T-cell receptor, does not occur under these mild conditions. In contrast, treatment with 300 μm of NaIO4—the conditions needed for chemo-exchange of the diol-based p*MHC—impeded T cell staining, due to concomitant oxidation of the methionine residue (Figure 2 B). Staining of PBMCs with MHC tetramers obtained by hypersensitive chemo-exchange was not donor-dependent (Figure S9).
Figure 2

Staining of PBMCs of healthy donors with HLA-A2.1 exchange tetramers obtained by use either of 10 μm NaIO4 or of UV-mediated exchange as indicated. A) MHC peptide exchange with flu (influenza A matrix1(58–66) epitope GILGFVFTL, top panels) or CMV (CMV pp65(495–503) epitope NLVPMVATV, bottom panels). p*UV: KILGFVFJV, in which J is a photocleavable 3-amino-3-(2-nitrophenyl)propionic acid residue.22 B) MHC exchange with CMV before (top panel) and after (bottom panel) treatment with a large excess of NaIO4. Numbers indicate percentages of MHC tetramer+ cells amongst CD8+ cells.

Staining of PBMCs of healthy <span class="Species">donors with HLA-A2.1 exchange tetramers obtained by use either of 10 μm <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">NaIO4 or of UV-mediated exchange as indicated. A) MHC peptide exchange with flu (influenza A matrix1(58–66) epitope GILGFVFTL, top panels) or CMV (CMV pp65(495–503) epitope NLVPMVATV, bottom panels). p*UV: KILGFVFJV, in which J is a photocleavable 3-amino-3-(2-nitrophenyl)propionic acid residue.22 B) MHC exchange with CMV before (top panel) and after (bottom panel) treatment with a large excess of NaIO4. Numbers indicate percentages of MHC tetramer+ cells amongst CD8+ cells. MHC tetramers generated by the <span class="Disease">hypersensitive chemoexchange reaction of HLA-A2.1::p*AA with Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) epitope GLCTLVAML, containing both an oxidation-sensitive <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">Cys residue and an oxidation-sensitive Met residue, did not stain PBMCs from an HLA-A2.1/EBV-positive individual (Figure S10). We attributed the impaired performance of these chemo-exchange tetramers to the presence of the cysteine residue. Isosteric replacement, a work-around that we have used before, gave variable, donor-dependent results in T cell staining by chemo-exchanged tetramers.3b We therefore turned to another strategy: cysteine caging, which has been made feasible by the extremely mild oxidative cleavage conditions used here, which preclude disulfide oxidation.18 This concept is based on protecting the cysteine residue in the epitope in the form of a disulfide that is liberated, after hypersensitive chemo-exchange, by a mild reducing reagent such as dithiothreitol (DTT) or tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine (TCEP), thereby regenerating a free cysteine residue without compromising MHC integrity (Figure 3 A). The cysteine residue of the EBV epitope was caged as a thiopropanoic acid disulfide, termed EBV-SPa (Figure S5). Exchange tetramers containing EBV-SPa did not stain peripheral blood cells of an EBV-positive donor, but treatment of EBV-Spa-exchanged monomers with either DTT or TCEP followed by tetramerisation resulted in efficient detection of EBV-positive cytotoxic T lymphocytes (Figure 3 B and Figure S11).
Figure 3

A) Concept of cysteine caging and liberation of the native antigenic epitope in the MHC peptide binding groove under mild conditions. R=SPa. B) Staining of PBMCs of healthy donors with HLA-A2.1 exchange tetramers obtained by use either of 10 μm NaIO4 or of UV-mediated exchange as indicated. EBV-SPa: EBV BMLF I(259–267) epitope GLC(SPa)TLVAML, in which cysteine is caged with a thiopropanoic acid group. Numbers indicate the percentages of MHC tetramer+ cells of CD8+ cells before (left) and after addition either (middle) of 0.5 mm DTT or (right) of 0.5 mm TCEP. C) Stimulation of clonal CD8+ T cells specific to the EBV BMLF I(259–267) epitope in complexation with HLA-A2.1 by direct interaction with the indicated exchanged MHC complexes immobilised on a streptavidin-coated plate. Similar levels of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production, indicating T cell activation, were observed with the use of EBV-loaded tetramers obtained by UV exchange (middle panel) or with the use of chemo-exchange with EBV-Spa followed by TCEP-mediated Cys uncaging. HBV: HLA-A2.1 restricted hepatitis B virus core(18–27) epitope, used here as a control for basal IFN-γ levels of nonactivated T cells (left panel).

A) Concept of <span class="Chemical">cysteine caging and liberation of the native antigenic epitope in the MHC peptide binding groove under mild conditions. R=SPa. B) Staining of PBMCs of healthy <ass="Gene">span class="Species">donors with HLA-A2.1 exchange tetramers obtained by use either of 10 μm NaIO4 or of UV-mediated exchange as indicated. EBV-SPa: EBV BMLF I(259–267) epitope GLC(SPa)TLVAML, in which cysteine is caged with a thiopropanoic acid group. Numbers indicate the percentages of MHC tetramer+ cells of CD8+ cells before (left) and after addition either (middle) of 0.5 mm DTT or (right) of 0.5 mm TCEP. C) Stimulation of clonal CD8+ T cells specific to the EBV BMLF I(259–267) epitope in complexation with HLA-A2.1 by direct interaction with the indicated exchanged MHC complexes immobilised on a streptavidin-coated plate. Similar levels of interferon-γ (IFN-γ) production, indicating T cell activation, were observed with the use of EBV-loaded tetramers obtained by UV exchange (middle panel) or with the use of chemo-exchange with EBV-Spa followed by TCEP-mediated Cys uncaging. HBV: HLA-A2.1 restricted hepatitis B virus core(18–27) epitope, used here as a control for basal IFN-γ levels of nonactivated T cells (left panel). We also investigated the use of <span class="Chemical">thiomethyl and thio-tert-butyl disulfides as caging groups, but these gave suboptimal results (Figures S6, S7, S12 and S13). To show the functionality of T cells interacting with chemo-exchanged multimers we performed a cytokine (IFN-γ) release assay, which revealed that chemo-exchanged multimers containing an uncaged EBV-<ass="Gene">span class="Gene">Spa epitope activate an EBV-positive T-cell clone as efficiently as UV-exchanged multimers (Figure 3 C).

Discussion

We have developed <span class="Gene">synthetic routes—one giving a diastereomeric mixture and one enantiopure—to <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">vicinal amino alcohol building blocks for application in SPPS. If diastereomeric purity is not essential, as was the case for periodate-triggered MHC peptide exchange, we recommend the use of the racemic syn/anti-l-DAHB building blocks 3 a (N-Fmoc-protected) or 3 b (N-Alloc-protected), given their ease of synthesis (only two steps from the protected 2-aminoacetaldehydes). The higher yields obtained in the synthesis of N-Alloc-protected 3 b would favour the use of this building block. However, if such yields are of no concern, the direct applicability of N-Fmoc-protected 3 a in standard Fmoc-based SPPS protocols is a clear advantage. Since its introduction in 2006,6a MHC exchange technology has become a standard tool for immunologists studying T cell selectivity and reactivity, and over 65 publications describing the use of exchange tetramers have appeared to date. Although the majority of conditional MHC ligands reported to date are based on UV cleavage of a <span class="Chemical">3-amino-3-(2-nitrophenyl)propionic acid residue, one can envisage that for certain applications UV irradiation would be less practical. Uniform parallel irradiation, as required for high-throughput screening of large collections of potential antigens, for example, is often difficult to achieve, which in turn yields skewed assay results. In addition, evaporation accelerated by the heat generated by the UV lamp is problematic when working with minute volumes in, for example, pMHC microarrays,19 or in other situations in which reagents are a limiting factor. In early attempts we tried to address these issues by the development of an orthogonal chemocleavable MHC exchange ligand, based on the reactivity of <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">vicinal diols towards sodium periodate.3b Sodium periodate concentrations of at least 300 μm were required to effectuate peptide exchange, however, and these conditions appeared incompatible with exchange peptides containing oxidation-prone residues such as Met or Cys. Recovery of the impaired T cell staining by utilization of nonoxidizable Met and Cys carba-isosteres was only partially successful, because the tolerance of these bioisosteres by the relevant T-cell receptor appeared to be donor-dependent, thus limiting the general applicability of this methodology. The <span class="Chemical">vicinal amino alcohol building block that we present here conveniently solved these problems because the peptide—p*AA—incorporating this moiety and loaded into the MHC complex was cleaved at a very low <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">NaIO4 concentration (10 μm), which precludes Met co-oxidation. T cell staining difficulties with Cys-containing exchange peptides were simply overcome by temporarily caging the Cys residue as a disulfide during the very mild oxidative exchange reaction. Subsequent uncaging by a mild reductant (DTT or TCEP) released the native MHC-bound epitope, eventually resulting in T-cell-reactive exchange tetramers. Notably, Cys disulfide caging has been made possible by the extremely mild oxidative conditions that enabled cleavage of the 1,2-amino alcohol. A disulfide-caged Cys residue can easily be incorporated in the exchange peptide during SPPS by making use of the corresponding protected building block. Although N-terminal Ser and Thr residues remain prone to periodate cleavage,2b these residues can be replaced by other periodate-resistant ones, because the N-terminal residue of an MHC class I epitope is not critical to interactions with the T-cell receptor.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the development of a <span class="Chemical">vicinal amino alcohol building block has made <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">periodate-mediated peptide backbone cleavage possible under extremely mild conditions and without accompanying methionine and disulfide oxidation. As a representative application we have shown that this cleavable moiety has truly opened chemically triggered MHC exchange technology to the broader scientific community, taking away the need for special laboratory equipment and allowing MHC class I epitope screening and assessment of T cell reactivities without limitations. Furthermore, we can also envisage the application of the vicinal amino alcohol building block in other conditional settings, such as when triggered depletion of effector peptides or ring-opening of cyclic peptides is desired. Moreover, incorporation of this building block into a protein by native chemical ligation, leading to a protein that can be cleaved at will by application of a mild chemical stimulus, is an interesting possibility.

Experimental Section

General: All commercial materials (Aldrich, Fluka, Novabiochem) were used without further purification. Peptide <span class="Gene">synthesis reagents (standard amino acid building blocks and PyBop) were purchased from Novabiochem. All solvents were reagent grade or HPLC grade. Unless stated otherwise, reactions were performed under inert atmospheres. NMR spectra (1H and <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">13C) were recorded with a Bruker Avance 300 spectrometer, referenced to TMS or residual solvent. LC-MS analysis was performed with a system containing a Waters 2795 separation module (Alliance HT), Waters 2996 Photodiode Array Detector (190–750 nm), Waters Alltima C18 (2.1×100 mm) or Phenomenex Kinetex XB-C18 (2.1×50 mm) reversed-phase column and a Micromass LCT-TOF mass spectrometer. Samples were run at 0.40 mL min−1 (Waters C18) or 0.80 mL min−1 (Kinetex C18) with use of a gradient of two mobile phases: A) aq. formic acid (0.1 %), and B) formic acid in CH3CN (0.1 %). Data processing was performed with the aid of Waters MassLynx 4.1 software. Preparative HPLC was performed with a Shimadzu LC-20AD/T instrument fitted with a C18 Vydac column (Grace Davison Discovery Sciences) with use of gradient elution [mobile phases: A) aq. TFA (0.05 %) and B) TFA in CH3CN (0.05 %)]. Gel-filtration chromatography was performed with a Biosep SEC S3000 column (Phenomenex) in PBS (pH 7.4). Cloning and expression of : l-Threonine aldolase DNA from <span class="Species">P. putida (accession number AB001577.1) was codon-optimised for expression in <ass="Gene">span class="Species">E. coli and commercially obtained from GeneArt. The 1041-base-pair DNA fragment was then amplified by PCR with use of primers 5′-GGTGGT CATATG ATGACC GATCAG AGCC and 5′-GGTGGT GGATCC CTAGTG ATGGTG ATGGTG ATGCGC GCTCAT CACC. The PCR product was inserted between the NdeI and BamHI restriction sites of the commercially available pet3a vector, which yielded plasmid pRHH1 (5699 bp). E. coli BL21 (DE3) pLysS cells were transformed with pRHH1 and expression was carried out at 37 °C in Luria–Bertani (LB) medium supplemented with chloramphenicol (34 μg mL−1) and carbenicillin (50 μg mL−1). Cells were grown to an OD600nm value of 0.6 and protein expression was induced by addition of isopropyl β-D-thiogalactopyranoside to a final concentration of 1 mm. After 4 h, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4 °C at 4000 g for 15 min and taken up in PBS buffer. Cells were then sonicated and the lysate was spun at 4 °C at 4000 g for 15 min to remove cell debris. The supernatant containing LTA (39 kDa) was directly used for the synthetic steps described below. (2: A solution of 1 a12 (280 mg, 1 mmol) in <span class="Chemical">DMSO (2 mL) and a solution of <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">glycine (200 mg, 2.7 mmol) in KH2PO4 buffer (pH 8.0, 50 mm, 2.6 mL) were added at 0 °C to KH2PO4 buffer (pH 8.0, 50 mm, 10 mL). LTA lysate (1 mL of 10 mg protein mL−1) and pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (5 mm in H2O, 75 μL) were added, and the mixture was placed on a horizontal shaker. After the mixture had been shaken at room temperature for 16 h, the reaction was quenched by addition of methanol/AcOH (95:5), lowering the pH to 3. Et2O was then added to the mixture, and after the mixture had been stirred for 5 min, the ether layer was removed. The remaining mixture was filtered over a Strata SCX cation-exchange solid-phase extraction column (Phenomenex) with elution with methanol/acetonitrile (1:1) and lyophilized to afford 2 a in 10 % yield. N.B. The product gradually decomposes in organic solvents and should be stored dry at −20 °C or immediately used for the next step. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO): δ=7.90 (d, J=7.9 Hz, 2 H), 7.72–7.68 (m, 2 H), 7.45–7.31 (m, 4 H), 4.36–3.90 (m, 5 H), 3.20–3.17 ppm (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO): δ=168.64, 156.35, 143.35, 140.65, 127.59, 127.05, 125.15, 120.07 68.24, 65.56, 46.64, 30.65 ppm; HRMS (ESI): calcd: 357.3725 [M+H]+; found: 357.1323. <span class="Chemical">(2S)-4-{[(Allyloxy)carbonyl]amino}-2-amino-3-hydroxybutanoic acid (2 b): <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">Glycine (300 mg, 4 mmol) was added to a solution of 1 b (150 mg, 1 mmol) in KH2PO4 buffer (pH 8.0, 50 mm, 1 mL), followed by the addition of LTA (1 mL) and pyridoxal-5′-phosphate (5 mm in H2O, 75 μL). The resulting mixture was placed on a horizontal shaker for 3 h. The reaction was quenched by addition of methanol/AcOH (95:5), lowering the pH to 3. The mixture was lyophilised and then purified by flash chromatography (eluents: n-butanol/H2O/AcOH 2:1:0.5) to afford 2 b in 50 % yield. 1H NMR (300 MHz, D2O): δ=5.97–5.84 (m, 1 H), 5.30–5.81 (m, 2 H), 4.53–4.52 (m, 2 H), 4.12–4.06 (m, 1 H), 3.76 (d, J=3.5 Hz, 0.45 H), 3.60 (d, J=4.3 Hz, 0.48 H), 3.33–3.18 ppm (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, D2O): δ=172.99, 171.88, 132.66, 117.45, 68.76, 66.06, 57.27, 56.89 (minor diastereoisomer), 43.34, 42.68 ppm (minor diastereoisomer). (2: Compound 2 a (67 mg, 0.19 mmol) was dissolved in <span class="Chemical">water/<ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">dioxane/methanol (20:1:1, v/v/v) and cooled to 0 °C, and solid NaHCO3 (62 mg, 0.76 mmol) was added to the suspension. A solution of di-tert-butyl dicarbonate (45 mg, 0.21 mmol) in dioxane was added dropwise, and the mixture was stirred at 4 °C for one hour. (N.B. The pH should be kept between 8 and 9, to avoid the retroaldol reaction, which takes place at pH>9.) The reaction was quenched by lowering the pH to 3 by addition of KHSO4 (1 m). The solution was partly concentrated by cold evaporation, and the water phase was extracted twice with cold ethyl acetate. The combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated to dryness in vacuo to afford the crude product, which was purified by flash chromatography (CH2Cl2/methanol 9:1) to afford 3 a as a white glassy solid (47 mg, 53 %). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ=7.69 (d, J=7.7 Hz, 2 H), 7.55 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.29–7.18 (m, 4 H), 4.25–4.11 (m, 5 H), 3.20–3.19 (m, 2 H), 1.37 and 1.35 ppm (2 s, 9 H, minor and major diastereoisomer, respectively); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ=158.95, 158.44, 145.36, 146.60, 128.77, 128.16, 126.10, 120.91, 80.99, 80.96 (minor diastereoisomer), 72.11 (minor diastereoisomer), 71.29, 67.99, 58.06 (minor diastereoisomer), 57.09, 44.83, 28.68 ppm; MS (ESI): calcd: 478.17 [M+Na]+; found: 478.94. (2S)-4-{[(Allyloxy)<span class="Chemical">carbonyl]amino}-2-[(: The procedure described for 3 a was also used to prepare 3 b in 40 % yield. 1H NMR (300 MHz, MeOD): δ=6.01–5.88 (m, 1 H), 5.35–5.18 (m, 2 H), 4.53–4.52 (m, 2 H), 4.26–3.95 (m, 2 H), 3.33–3.18 (m, 2 H), 1.47 ppm (s, 9 H); <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">13C NMR (300 MHz, MeOD): δ=174.27, 173.73, 158.80, 158.38, 134.42, 117.56, 80.96, 80.82 (minor), 66.57 (minor), 66.53, 61.93, 58.09 (minor), 57.34, 44.80, 44.64 (minor), 28.69 ppm. (2: <span class="Chemical">TFA (1.3 mL) was added to a solution of 43b (1 g, 2.5 mmol) in <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">THF/H2O (2.5:1 mL) and the mixture was stirred for 4 h at room temperature. The solvent was evaporated in vacuo to afford 5 (870 mg) as a white powder that was used as such for the next step. 1H NMR (300 MHz, DMSO): δ=7. 89 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.77 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.44–7.30 (m, 4 H), 7.15 (br, 1 H), 4.28–4.18 (m, 3 H), 3.91 (d, J=3.9 Hz, 1 H) 3.76–3.70 (m, 1 H), 3.25–3.01 ppm (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, DMSO): δ=173.73, 157.29, 143.89, 140.66, 127.57, 127.04, 125.24, 120.05, 72.90, 71.32, 65.44, 46.67, 43.11 ppm. Methyl (2: Concentrated HCl (1 mL) was added to a solution of 5 (870 mg, 2.4 mmol) in <span class="Chemical">methanol (100 mL) and the mixture was stirred at 65 °C for 6 h. The solvent was evaporated, and the crude product was purified by flash chromatography (<ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">ethyl acetate/hexanes 3:2→2:1) to afford 6 as a white solid (690 mg, 77 %). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=7.77 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.59 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.44–7.30, 5.20 (br, 1 H), 4.47 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 2 H), 4.24–4.23 (dd, J=6.5 Hz, 1 H), 4.14 (d, J=5.86 Hz, 1 H), 3.99–3.93 (m, 1 H) 3.84 (s, 3 H), 3.53–3.38 ppm (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=173.31, 157.67, 143.79, 141.36, 127.76, 127.09, 124.95, 120.03, 72.16, 71.76, 67.01, 52.85, 47.23, 42.67 ppm. Methyl (4: Et3N (1.1 mL, 8.14 mmol) and a solution of SOCl2 (0.3 mL, 4.1 mmol) in dry <span class="Chemical">CH2Cl2 (2 mL) were added at 0 °C to a solution of 6 (690 mg, 1.85 mmol) in dry <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">CH2Cl2 (11 mL). The resulting mixture was stirred at 0 °C until disappearance of the starting material was observed by TLC (about 1.5 h). The mixture was then poured into cold water and extracted with ethyl acetate. The organic layer was washed with water and brine and dried over Na2SO4. Concentration to dryness in vacuo yielded the crude product, which was purified by flash chromatography (ethyl acetate/Hex 1:1) to afford 7 as a yellow oil (630 mg, 80 %). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=7.79 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.62 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.58–7.33 (m, 4 H), 5.32–5.20 (m, 3 H), 4.49 (br s, 2 H), 3.78 (s, 3 H), 3.74–3.65 (m, 1 H), 3.44–3.34 ppm (m, 1 H). Methyl (4: <span class="Chemical">H2O (6 mL), <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">RuCl3⋅x H2O (4.5 mg, 0.02 mmol) and NaIO4 (643 mg, 3 mmol) were added at 0 °C to a solution of 7 (630 mg, 1.5 mmol) in CCl4/CH3CN 10 mL (1:1, v/v). After the slurry had been stirred for 1 h at 0 °C, Et2O (30 mL) and hexanes (30 mL) were added. The organic layer was separated, filtered over filter paper and washed with aq. NaHCO3 (1 %). The water phase was back-extracted with Et2O, and the combined organic layers were washed with brine, dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated to dryness in vacuo to afford 8 as a white powder (470 mg, 70 %). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=7.70 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.50 (d, J=7.6 Hz, 2 H), 7.37–7.23 (m, 4 H), 5.25–5.06 (m, 2 H), 4.42 (br s, 2 H), 4.17–4.12 (dd, 1 H), 3.78 (s, 3 H), 3.62–3.49 ppm (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ=164.12, 156.15, 143.59, 141.46, 127.89, 127.21, 124.96, 120.06, 80.74, 77.54, 67.34, 53.73, 47.08, 40.34 ppm; FTIR (solid): =1716, 1396, 1211 cm−1. Methyl (2: <span class="Chemical">NaN3 (130 mg, 2 mmol) was added at 0 °C to a solution of 8 (420 mg, 1 mmol) in <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">acetone (4 mL) and water (0.5 mL), and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. Cold H2SO4 (20 %) and Et2O (1:1, v/v, 10 mL) were added and stirring was continued for 16 h. Et2O was added, and the phases were separated. The water phase was washed with CH2Cl2. The organic phases were washed with water and brine. The organic layers were combined and evaporated in vacuo to afford 9 (280 mg, 64 %). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl3): δ=7.75 (d, J=7.5 Hz, 2 H), 7.57 (d, J=7.4 Hz, 2 H), 7.42–7.29 (m, 4 H), 4.47 (d, J=6.5 Hz, 2 H), 4.23–4.19 (m, 2 H), 3.87–3.84 (m, 1 H), 3.37–3.28 ppm (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ=169.22, 157.79, 143.55, 141.34, 127.81, 127.16, 124.95, 120.01, 71.04, 67.65, 63.74, 53.27, 47.07, 44.24 ppm; FTIR (solid): =2112, 1750, 1701, 1527, 1267 cm−1. (2: Trimethyltin (500 mg, 2.5 mmol) was added to a solution of 9 (200 mg, 0.5 mmol) in dichloroethane (6 mL) and the solution was stirred at 82 °C for 3 h. The mixture was allowed to cool to room temperature, and cold <span class="Chemical">ethyl acetate (5 mL) was added, followed by cold aq. HCl (5 %, 5 mL). The mixture was stirred for 10 min, extra <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">ethyl acetate was added, and the phases were separated. The organic layer was washed with water and brine, dried with Na2SO4 and concentrated to dryness in vacuo. The crude product was purified over a short silica column (CH2Cl2/methanol 98:2→95:5) to afford the pure product 10 as an off-white solid (130 mg, 68 %). 1H NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ=7.85 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.73 (d, J=7.8 Hz, 2 H), 7.42–7.29 (m, 4 H), 4.40 (d, J=7.0 Hz, 2 H), 4.24–4.20 (m, 2 H), 3.90–3.82 (m, 1 H), 3.28–3.23 ppm (m, 2 H); 13C NMR (300 MHz, CD3OD): δ=173.32, 159.78, 146.04, 143.37, 129.55, 128.94, 126.92, 121.72, 72.88, 68.50, 65.55, 49.24, 45.71 ppm; FTIR (solid): =3300, 2112, 1741, 1672, 1541 cm−1; MS (ESI): calcd: 382.1277 [M+H]+; found: 383.1122. Peptide <span class="Gene">synthesis: All <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">peptides were synthesised by standard Fmoc SPPS on a 25 μmol scale with a Syro II MultiSyntech automated peptide synthesiser. Removal of Alloc groups was achieved with Pd(PPh3)4 (3 equiv) in CH2Cl2/AcOH/N-methylmorpholine (37:2:1) mixtures. Azido groups were reduced by treatment with Bu3P (5 equiv) in THF containing a few droplets of water. Peptides were cleaved from the resin and deprotected with TFA/iPr3SiH/H2O (95:2.5:2.5), precipitated in cold n-pentane/diethyl ether and purified by RP-HPLC (C18). All peptides were analysed by LC-MS and used at >98 % purity. Protein expression and purification: MHC class I refolding reactions were performed as described, and class I complexes were purified by gel-filtration chromatography. Biotinylation and MHC tetramer formation were performed as described.20 Protocol for <span class="Disease">hypersensitive MHC peptide exchange triggered by NaIO: Exchange peptide (pH 7.4, 50 μm) and biotinylated HLA-A2.1::p*AA (0.5 μm) in <ass="Gene">span class="Chemical">PBS (50 μL) were treated with NaIO4 (10 μm) for 45 min at room temperature. Optionally, subsequent uncaging of disulfide-protected Cys residues is achieved by treatment with DTT or TCEP (500 μm) for 15 min. Exchanged monomers were used for tetramerisation as previously described20 or for cytokine release assays as described below. T cells: For analysis of MHC tetramer binding and T cell responses in <span class="Species">human samples, peripheral blood mononuclear cells of healthy volunteers were obtained by Ficoll gradient separation. A cryopreserved <ass="Gene">span class="Gene">CD8+ T-cell clone, derived from a healthy donor expressing the HLA-A2.1 complex specifically binding EBV BMLF I(259–267), was kindly provided by Ms. Marit van Buuren (NKI, Amsterdam, NL). Cryopreserved cells were thawed 24 h prior to cytokine release assays and were suspended in cytotoxic T lymphocyte (CTL) medium [RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with Glutamax, HEPES, human serum (10 %) and penicillin/streptomycin (6000 U mL−1)]. Tetramer staining: Cells were stained with the indicated MHC tetramers for 4 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, cells were incubated with anti-<span class="Gene">CD8 antibody (BD Biosciences) for 10–15 min at 25 °C. Data acquisition and analysis was carried out with a FACSCalibur (Becton Dickinson) instrument and use of FlowJo software. Cytokine release assay: T cell activity was analysed by an adapted procedure based on the use of immobilised MHC tetramers.21 Briefly, exchange monomers (100 μL per well) were added to a 96-well streptavidin coated plate (NUNC, Immobilizer Streptavidin, #436014) blocked with <span class="Species">bovine <ass="Gene">span class="Gene">serum albumin (BSA)/PBS (2 %). After 30 min incubation, the plate was washed with PBS. T cells were spun at 1700 rpm for 10 min and were resuspended in CTL medium supplemented with protein transport inhibitor (1 μL mL−1, GolgiPlug, BD Biosciences #555029) at 4×105 cells mL−1. T cells were added (100 μL per well) to the MHC-streptavidin coated plate, and the plate was briefly centrifuged (700 rpm, 3 min) to enhance MHC/T cell contact before incubation for 4 h at 37 °C under CO2 (7 %). The cells were pelleted at 1700 rpm for 3 min, resuspended in FACS buffer [50 μL, BSA (0.5 %), NaN3 (0.02 %) in PBS] and transferred to a 96-well U-bottom plate (BD FALCON #353077). Cells were stained with FITC-conjugated antibodies to CD8 (BD Biosciences, #345772) for 15 min at 25 °C, fixed and permeabilised (BD Cytofix/Cytoperm kit, #554714), and stained with APC-conjugated antibodies to IFNγ (BD Biosciences, #341117) for 30 min at 4 °C. Samples were analysed by flow cytometry.
  21 in total

1.  Parallel detection of antigen-specific T cell responses by combinatorial encoding of MHC multimers.

Authors:  Rikke Sick Andersen; Pia Kvistborg; Thomas Mørch Frøsig; Natasja W Pedersen; Rikke Lyngaa; Arnold H Bakker; Chengyi Jenny Shu; Per thor Straten; Ton N Schumacher; Sine Reker Hadrup
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2012-04-12       Impact factor: 13.491

2.  HLA-restricted epitope identification and detection of functional T cell responses by using MHC-peptide and costimulatory microarrays.

Authors:  Jennifer D Stone; Walter E Demkowicz; Lawrence J Stern
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  A mild and selective method for the hydrolysis of esters with trimethyltin hydroxide.

Authors:  K C Nicolaou; Anthony A Estrada; Mark Zak; Sang Hyup Lee; Brian S Safina
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  The antigenic identity of peptide-MHC complexes: a comparison of the conformations of five viral peptides presented by HLA-A2.

Authors:  D R Madden; D N Garboczi; D C Wiley
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1993-11-19       Impact factor: 41.582

5.  Macrophage recognition of periodate-treated erythrocytes: involvement of disulfide formation of the erythrocyte membrane proteins.

Authors:  M Beppu; H Ochiai; K Kikugawa
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1989-02-13

6.  Phenotypic analysis of antigen-specific T lymphocytes.

Authors:  J D Altman; P A Moss; P J Goulder; D H Barouch; M G McHeyzer-Williams; J I Bell; A J McMichael; M M Davis
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-10-04       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  THE PERIODATE OXIDATION OF AMINO ACIDS WITH REFERENCE TO STUDIES ON GLYCOPROTEINS.

Authors:  J R CLAMP; L HOUGH
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1965-01       Impact factor: 3.857

8.  Site-directed conjugation of nonpeptide groups to peptides and proteins via periodate oxidation of a 2-amino alcohol. Application to modification at N-terminal serine.

Authors:  K F Geoghegan; J G Stroh
Journal:  Bioconjug Chem       Date:  1992 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.774

9.  Marked differences in human melanoma antigen-specific T cell responsiveness after vaccination using a functional microarray.

Authors:  Daniel S Chen; Yoav Soen; Tor B Stuge; Peter P Lee; Jeffrey S Weber; Patrick O Brown; Mark M Davis
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2005-09-20       Impact factor: 11.069

10.  Detection and characterization of cellular immune responses using peptide-MHC microarrays.

Authors:  Yoav Soen; Daniel S Chen; Daniel L Kraft; Mark M Davis; Patrick O Brown
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2003-12-22       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Oximes and Hydrazones in Bioconjugation: Mechanism and Catalysis.

Authors:  Dominik K Kölmel; Eric T Kool
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 60.622

2.  Secondary Amino Alcohols: Traceless Cleavable Linkers for Use in Affinity Capture and Release.

Authors:  Sebastian Pomplun; Christopher R Shugrue; Adeline M Schmitt; Carly K Schissel; Charlotte E Farquhar; Bradley L Pentelute
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 15.336

3.  Biotin-transfer from a trifunctional crosslinker for identification of cell surface receptors of soluble protein ligands.

Authors:  Tammy-Lynn Tremblay; Jennifer J Hill
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-04-19       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  A flexible MHC class I multimer loading system for large-scale detection of antigen-specific T cells.

Authors:  Jolien J Luimstra; Malgorzata A Garstka; Marthe C J Roex; Anke Redeker; George M C Janssen; Peter A van Veelen; Ramon Arens; J H Frederik Falkenburg; Jacques Neefjes; Huib Ovaa
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 14.307

5.  Production and Thermal Exchange of Conditional Peptide-MHC I Multimers.

Authors:  Jolien J Luimstra; Kees L M C Franken; Malgorzata A Garstka; Jan W Drijfhout; Jacques Neefjes; Huib Ovaa
Journal:  Curr Protoc Immunol       Date:  2019-09

6.  Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition).

Authors:  Andrea Cossarizza; Hyun-Dong Chang; Andreas Radbruch; Andreas Acs; Dieter Adam; Sabine Adam-Klages; William W Agace; Nima Aghaeepour; Mübeccel Akdis; Matthieu Allez; Larissa Nogueira Almeida; Giorgia Alvisi; Graham Anderson; Immanuel Andrä; Francesco Annunziato; Achille Anselmo; Petra Bacher; Cosima T Baldari; Sudipto Bari; Vincenzo Barnaba; Joana Barros-Martins; Luca Battistini; Wolfgang Bauer; Sabine Baumgart; Nicole Baumgarth; Dirk Baumjohann; Bianka Baying; Mary Bebawy; Burkhard Becher; Wolfgang Beisker; Vladimir Benes; Rudi Beyaert; Alfonso Blanco; Dominic A Boardman; Christian Bogdan; Jessica G Borger; Giovanna Borsellino; Philip E Boulais; Jolene A Bradford; Dirk Brenner; Ryan R Brinkman; Anna E S Brooks; Dirk H Busch; Martin Büscher; Timothy P Bushnell; Federica Calzetti; Garth Cameron; Ilenia Cammarata; Xuetao Cao; Susanna L Cardell; Stefano Casola; Marco A Cassatella; Andrea Cavani; Antonio Celada; Lucienne Chatenoud; Pratip K Chattopadhyay; Sue Chow; Eleni Christakou; Luka Čičin-Šain; Mario Clerici; Federico S Colombo; Laura Cook; Anne Cooke; Andrea M Cooper; Alexandra J Corbett; Antonio Cosma; Lorenzo Cosmi; Pierre G Coulie; Ana Cumano; Ljiljana Cvetkovic; Van Duc Dang; Chantip Dang-Heine; Martin S Davey; Derek Davies; Sara De Biasi; Genny Del Zotto; Gelo Victoriano Dela Cruz; Michael Delacher; Silvia Della Bella; Paolo Dellabona; Günnur Deniz; Mark Dessing; James P Di Santo; Andreas Diefenbach; Francesco Dieli; Andreas Dolf; Thomas Dörner; Regine J Dress; Diana Dudziak; Michael Dustin; Charles-Antoine Dutertre; Friederike Ebner; Sidonia B G Eckle; Matthias Edinger; Pascale Eede; Götz R A Ehrhardt; Marcus Eich; Pablo Engel; Britta Engelhardt; Anna Erdei; Charlotte Esser; Bart Everts; Maximilien Evrard; Christine S Falk; Todd A Fehniger; Mar Felipo-Benavent; Helen Ferry; Markus Feuerer; Andrew Filby; Kata Filkor; Simon Fillatreau; Marie Follo; Irmgard Förster; John Foster; Gemma A Foulds; Britta Frehse; Paul S Frenette; Stefan Frischbutter; Wolfgang Fritzsche; David W Galbraith; Anastasia Gangaev; Natalio Garbi; Brice Gaudilliere; Ricardo T Gazzinelli; Jens Geginat; Wilhelm Gerner; Nicholas A Gherardin; Kamran Ghoreschi; Lara Gibellini; Florent Ginhoux; Keisuke Goda; Dale I Godfrey; Christoph Goettlinger; Jose M González-Navajas; Carl S Goodyear; Andrea Gori; Jane L Grogan; Daryl Grummitt; Andreas Grützkau; Claudia Haftmann; Jonas Hahn; Hamida Hammad; Günter Hämmerling; Leo Hansmann; Goran Hansson; Christopher M Harpur; Susanne Hartmann; Andrea Hauser; Anja E Hauser; David L Haviland; David Hedley; Daniela C Hernández; Guadalupe Herrera; Martin Herrmann; Christoph Hess; Thomas Höfer; Petra Hoffmann; Kristin Hogquist; Tristan Holland; Thomas Höllt; Rikard Holmdahl; Pleun Hombrink; Jessica P Houston; Bimba F Hoyer; Bo Huang; Fang-Ping Huang; Johanna E Huber; Jochen Huehn; Michael Hundemer; Christopher A Hunter; William Y K Hwang; Anna Iannone; Florian Ingelfinger; Sabine M Ivison; Hans-Martin Jäck; Peter K Jani; Beatriz Jávega; Stipan Jonjic; Toralf Kaiser; Tomas Kalina; Thomas Kamradt; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Baerbel Keller; Steven L C Ketelaars; Ahad Khalilnezhad; Srijit Khan; Jan Kisielow; Paul Klenerman; Jasmin Knopf; Hui-Fern Koay; Katja Kobow; Jay K Kolls; Wan Ting Kong; Manfred Kopf; Thomas Korn; Katharina Kriegsmann; Hendy Kristyanto; Thomas Kroneis; Andreas Krueger; Jenny Kühne; Christian Kukat; Désirée Kunkel; Heike Kunze-Schumacher; Tomohiro Kurosaki; Christian Kurts; Pia Kvistborg; Immanuel Kwok; Jonathan Landry; Olivier Lantz; Paola Lanuti; Francesca LaRosa; Agnès Lehuen; Salomé LeibundGut-Landmann; Michael D Leipold; Leslie Y T Leung; Megan K Levings; Andreia C Lino; Francesco Liotta; Virginia Litwin; Yanling Liu; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren; Michael Lohoff; Giovanna Lombardi; Lilly Lopez; Miguel López-Botet; Amy E Lovett-Racke; Erik Lubberts; Herve Luche; Burkhard Ludewig; Enrico Lugli; Sebastian Lunemann; Holden T Maecker; Laura Maggi; Orla Maguire; Florian Mair; Kerstin H Mair; Alberto Mantovani; Rudolf A Manz; Aaron J Marshall; Alicia Martínez-Romero; Glòria Martrus; Ivana Marventano; Wlodzimierz Maslinski; Giuseppe Matarese; Anna Vittoria Mattioli; Christian Maueröder; Alessio Mazzoni; James McCluskey; Mairi McGrath; Helen M McGuire; Iain B McInnes; Henrik E Mei; Fritz Melchers; Susanne Melzer; Dirk Mielenz; Stephen D Miller; Kingston H G Mills; Hans Minderman; Jenny Mjösberg; Jonni Moore; Barry Moran; Lorenzo Moretta; Tim R Mosmann; Susann Müller; Gabriele Multhoff; Luis Enrique Muñoz; Christian Münz; Toshinori Nakayama; Milena Nasi; Katrin Neumann; Lai Guan Ng; Antonia Niedobitek; Sussan Nourshargh; Gabriel Núñez; José-Enrique O'Connor; Aaron Ochel; Anna Oja; Diana Ordonez; Alberto Orfao; Eva Orlowski-Oliver; Wenjun Ouyang; Annette Oxenius; Raghavendra Palankar; Isabel Panse; Kovit Pattanapanyasat; Malte Paulsen; Dinko Pavlinic; Livius Penter; Pärt Peterson; Christian Peth; Jordi Petriz; Federica Piancone; Winfried F Pickl; Silvia Piconese; Marcello Pinti; A Graham Pockley; Malgorzata Justyna Podolska; Zhiyong Poon; Katharina Pracht; Immo Prinz; Carlo E M Pucillo; Sally A Quataert; Linda Quatrini; Kylie M Quinn; Helena Radbruch; Tim R D J Radstake; Susann Rahmig; Hans-Peter Rahn; Bartek Rajwa; Gevitha Ravichandran; Yotam Raz; Jonathan A Rebhahn; Diether Recktenwald; Dorothea Reimer; Caetano Reis e Sousa; Ester B M Remmerswaal; Lisa Richter; Laura G Rico; Andy Riddell; Aja M Rieger; J Paul Robinson; Chiara Romagnani; Anna Rubartelli; Jürgen Ruland; Armin Saalmüller; Yvan Saeys; Takashi Saito; Shimon Sakaguchi; Francisco Sala-de-Oyanguren; Yvonne Samstag; Sharon Sanderson; Inga Sandrock; Angela Santoni; Ramon Bellmàs Sanz; Marina Saresella; Catherine Sautes-Fridman; Birgit Sawitzki; Linda Schadt; Alexander Scheffold; Hans U Scherer; Matthias Schiemann; Frank A Schildberg; Esther Schimisky; Andreas Schlitzer; Josephine Schlosser; Stephan Schmid; Steffen Schmitt; Kilian Schober; Daniel Schraivogel; Wolfgang Schuh; Thomas Schüler; Reiner Schulte; Axel Ronald Schulz; Sebastian R Schulz; Cristiano Scottá; Daniel Scott-Algara; David P Sester; T Vincent Shankey; Bruno Silva-Santos; Anna Katharina Simon; Katarzyna M Sitnik; Silvano Sozzani; Daniel E Speiser; Josef Spidlen; Anders Stahlberg; Alan M Stall; Natalie Stanley; Regina Stark; Christina Stehle; Tobit Steinmetz; Hannes Stockinger; Yousuke Takahama; Kiyoshi Takeda; Leonard Tan; Attila Tárnok; Gisa Tiegs; Gergely Toldi; Julia Tornack; Elisabetta Traggiai; Mohamed Trebak; Timothy I M Tree; Joe Trotter; John Trowsdale; Maria Tsoumakidou; Henning Ulrich; Sophia Urbanczyk; Willem van de Veen; Maries van den Broek; Edwin van der Pol; Sofie Van Gassen; Gert Van Isterdael; René A W van Lier; Marc Veldhoen; Salvador Vento-Asturias; Paulo Vieira; David Voehringer; Hans-Dieter Volk; Anouk von Borstel; Konrad von Volkmann; Ari Waisman; Rachael V Walker; Paul K Wallace; Sa A Wang; Xin M Wang; Michael D Ward; Kirsten A Ward-Hartstonge; Klaus Warnatz; Gary Warnes; Sarah Warth; Claudia Waskow; James V Watson; Carsten Watzl; Leonie Wegener; Thomas Weisenburger; Annika Wiedemann; Jürgen Wienands; Anneke Wilharm; Robert John Wilkinson; Gerald Willimsky; James B Wing; Rieke Winkelmann; Thomas H Winkler; Oliver F Wirz; Alicia Wong; Peter Wurst; Jennie H M Yang; Juhao Yang; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Liping Yu; Alice Yue; Hanlin Zhang; Yi Zhao; Susanne Maria Ziegler; Christina Zielinski; Jakob Zimmermann; Arturo Zychlinsky
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.688

7.  Chemical Modification of Influenza CD8+ T-Cell Epitopes Enhances Their Immunogenicity Regardless of Immunodominance.

Authors:  Sietske K Rosendahl Huber; Jolien J Luimstra; Josine van Beek; Rieuwert Hoppes; Ronald H J Jacobi; Marion Hendriks; Kim Kapteijn; Casper Ouwerkerk; Boris Rodenko; Huib Ovaa; Jørgen de Jonge
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-22       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.