Literature DB >> 23280341

Identifying patients with undetected renal tract cancer in primary care: an independent and external validation of QCancer® (Renal) prediction model.

Gary S Collins1, Douglas G Altman.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the performance of QCancer® (Renal) for predicting the absolute risk of renal tract cancer in a large independent UK cohort of patients from general practice records.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Open cohort study to validate QCancer® (Renal) prediction model. Record from 365 practices from United Kingdom contributing to The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database. 2.1 million patients registered with a general practice surgery between 01 January 2000 and 30 June 2008, aged 30-84 years (3.7 million person years) with 2283 renal tract cancer cases. Renal tract cancer was defined as incident diagnosis of renal tract cancer during the 2 years after study entry. Model discrimination was measured using the receiver operating characteristics derived area under the curve. Calibration plots examined the relationship between predicted and observed probabilities of undetected renal tract cancer.
RESULTS: The results from this independent and external validation of QCancer® (Renal) demonstrated good performance data on a large cohort of general practice patients. QCancer® (Renal) had very good discrimination with areas under the ROC curve of 0.92 and 0.95 for women and men respectively. QCancer® (Renal) was well calibrated across all tenths of risk and over all age ranges with predicted risks closely matching observed risks. QCancer® (Renal) explained 74.4% and 74.2% of the variation in men and women respectively. A limitation of our study is the recording of symptoms might be less complete, as patients with mild symptoms may not visit their general practitioner or not report mild symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: QCancer® (Renal) are useful tools to help in identifying undetected cases of undiagnosed renal tract cancer in primary care in the UK.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23280341     DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2012.11.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol        ISSN: 1877-7821            Impact factor:   2.984


  10 in total

1.  Identifying patients with undetected pancreatic cancer in primary care: an independent and external validation of QCancer(®) (Pancreas).

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  Antonieta Medina-Lara; Bogdan Grigore; Ruth Lewis; Jaime Peters; Sarah Price; Paolo Landa; Sophie Robinson; Richard Neal; William Hamilton; Anne E Spencer
Journal:  Health Technol Assess       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.014

3.  Artificial intelligence predictive system of individual survival rate for lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Tingshan He; Jing Li; Peng Wang; Zhiqiao Zhang
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2022-05-14       Impact factor: 6.155

4.  Weight loss as a predictor of cancer in primary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Brian D Nicholson; William Hamilton; Jack O'Sullivan; Paul Aveyard; Fd Richard Hobbs
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 5.  The association between symptoms and bladder or renal tract cancer in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mia Schmidt-Hansen; Sabine Berendse; William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Symptom Signatures and Diagnostic Timeliness in Cancer Patients: A Review of Current Evidence.

Authors:  Minjoung M Koo; William Hamilton; Fiona M Walter; Greg P Rubin; Georgios Lyratzopoulos
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 5.715

7.  Availability and use of cancer decision-support tools: a cross-sectional survey of UK primary care.

Authors:  Sarah Price; Anne Spencer; Antonieta Medina-Lara; Willie Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Emmanuel O Ogundimu; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.373

9.  Quantifying the impact of different approaches for handling continuous predictors on the performance of a prognostic model.

Authors:  Gary S Collins; Emmanuel O Ogundimu; Jonathan A Cook; Yannick Le Manach; Douglas G Altman
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-05-18       Impact factor: 2.373

10.  Evaluation of the performance of clinical predictors in estimating the probability of pulmonary tuberculosis among smear-negative cases in Northern Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Mala George; Geert-Jan Dinant; Efrem Kentiba; Teklu Teshome; Abinet Teshome; Behailu Tsegaye; Mark Spigt
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 2.692

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.