Literature DB >> 23280267

How useful is imaging in predicting outcomes in stroke rehabilitation?

Cathy M Stinear1, Nick S Ward.   

Abstract

Neuroimaging plays an important role in acute stroke diagnosis and management, but it is not routinely used in rehabilitation settings. Incorporating imaging information in rehabilitation planning may eventually translate to better outcomes after stroke. Here we review the prediction of outcomes after stroke using magnetic resonance imaging. There are clear and specific relationships between the anatomy of the stroke lesion and impairments at the time of scanning, and at later time points in recovery. However, most studies demonstrate these relationships in groups of patients at the chronic stage. In order to be useful for rehabilitation, neuroimaging needs to provide prognostic information for individual patients at a much earlier stage. Recent studies have used diffusion tensor imaging and functional neuroimaging to address this, with promising results. Combining neuroimaging with clinical and neurophysiological assessments may also be useful. Future work in this area may support the tailoring of rehabilitation for individual patients based on their capacity for neural reorganization and recovery.
© 2012 The Authors. International Journal of Stroke © 2012 World Stroke Organization.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23280267     DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00970.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Stroke        ISSN: 1747-4930            Impact factor:   5.266


  25 in total

Review 1.  Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic biomarker for motor recovery and rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Josep Puig; Gerard Blasco; Gottfried Schlaug; Cathy M Stinear; Pepus Daunis-I-Estadella; Carles Biarnes; Jaume Figueras; Joaquín Serena; Maria Hernández-Pérez; Angel Alberich-Bayarri; Mar Castellanos; David S Liebeskind; Andrew M Demchuk; Bijoy K Menon; Götz Thomalla; Kambiz Nael; Max Wintermark; Salvador Pedraza
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 2.  Genetic Variation and Neuroplasticity: Role in Rehabilitation After Stroke.

Authors:  Jill Campbell Stewart; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 3.649

3.  Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke.

Authors:  Erin Burke Quinlan; Lucy Dodakian; Jill See; Alison McKenzie; Vu Le; Mike Wojnowicz; Babak Shahbaba; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 10.422

4.  Differences in motor network dynamics during recovery between supra- and infra-tentorial ischemic strokes.

Authors:  Jungsoo Lee; Ahee Lee; Heegoo Kim; Won Hyuk Chang; Yun-Hee Kim
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-08-18       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Individual prediction of chronic motor outcome in the acute post-stroke stage: Behavioral parameters versus functional imaging.

Authors:  Anne K Rehme; Lukas J Volz; Delia-Lisa Feis; Simon B Eickhoff; Gereon R Fink; Christian Grefkes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Utility of EEG measures of brain function in patients with acute stroke.

Authors:  Jennifer Wu; Ramesh Srinivasan; Erin Burke Quinlan; Ana Solodkin; Steven L Small; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Imaging for prediction of functional outcome and assessment of recovery in ischemic stroke.

Authors:  Wolf-Dieter Heiss; Chelsea S Kidwell
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 7.914

8.  Consensus paper: management of degenerative cerebellar disorders.

Authors:  W Ilg; A J Bastian; S Boesch; R G Burciu; P Celnik; J Claaßen; K Feil; R Kalla; I Miyai; W Nachbauer; L Schöls; M Strupp; M Synofzik; J Teufel; D Timmann
Journal:  Cerebellum       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 3.847

9.  Predictors and biomarkers of treatment gains in a clinical stroke trial targeting the lower extremity.

Authors:  Erin Burke; Bruce H Dobkin; Elizabeth A Noser; Lori A Enney; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-06-24       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Somatosensory system integrity explains differences in treatment response after stroke.

Authors:  Morgan L Ingemanson; Justin R Rowe; Vicky Chan; Eric T Wolbrecht; David J Reinkensmeyer; Steven C Cramer
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 9.910

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.