BACKGROUND: The WHO-classification was shown to be an independent prognostic marker in some but not all retrospective studies possibly due to lack of reproducibility. We investigated the reproducibility of the WHO-classification and its prognostic implication using a large series of resected thymomas. METHODS: Four independent pathologists histologically classified a surgical series of 129 thymic tumors in a blinded fashion. Fleiss' kappa-coefficient was used to assess the pathologists' overall agreement, and Cohen-Kappa to assess the agreement between two observers. Disease-related-survival (DRS) and progression-free-survival (PFS) curves were generated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: In 63/129 (48.8%) cases there was a complete agreement; in 43/129 (33.3%) cases 3/4 pathological diagnoses were identical; in 15/129 (11.6%) cases the diagnoses were identical by pair; in 8/129 (6.2%) cases three different pathological diagnoses were on record. The Kappa-correlation coefficient was only moderate (0.53). A following web review carried out on the 23 cases with at least two different diagnoses reached a complete consensus. The histotype showed a statistically significant impact on PFS and DRS in the classification provided by only two pathologists. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the agreement on WHO classification of thymomas was only moderate and this impacted on patients management. Web consensus conference on the diagnosis, more stringent diagnostic criteria or the adoption of referral diagnostic centres may substantially reduce discrepancies. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
BACKGROUND: The WHO-classification was shown to be an independent prognostic marker in some but not all retrospective studies possibly due to lack of reproducibility. We investigated the reproducibility of the WHO-classification and its prognostic implication using a large series of resected thymomas. METHODS: Four independent pathologists histologically classified a surgical series of 129 thymic tumors in a blinded fashion. Fleiss' kappa-coefficient was used to assess the pathologists' overall agreement, and Cohen-Kappa to assess the agreement between two observers. Disease-related-survival (DRS) and progression-free-survival (PFS) curves were generated by Kaplan-Meier method and compared by log-rank test. RESULTS: In 63/129 (48.8%) cases there was a complete agreement; in 43/129 (33.3%) cases 3/4 pathological diagnoses were identical; in 15/129 (11.6%) cases the diagnoses were identical by pair; in 8/129 (6.2%) cases three different pathological diagnoses were on record. The Kappa-correlation coefficient was only moderate (0.53). A following web review carried out on the 23 cases with at least two different diagnoses reached a complete consensus. The histotype showed a statistically significant impact on PFS and DRS in the classification provided by only two pathologists. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the agreement on WHO classification of thymomas was only moderate and this impacted on patients management. Web consensus conference on the diagnosis, more stringent diagnostic criteria or the adoption of referral diagnostic centres may substantially reduce discrepancies. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
Authors: Paolo A Zucali; Iacopo Petrini; Elena Lorenzi; Maria Merino; Liang Cao; Luca Di Tommaso; Hye Seung Lee; Matteo Incarbone; Beatriz A Walter; Matteo Simonelli; Massimo Roncalli; Armando Santoro; Giuseppe Giaccone Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Gang Chen; Alexander Marx; Wen-Hu Chen; Jiang Yong; Bernhard Puppe; Philipp Stroebel; Hans Konrad Mueller-Hermelink Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-07-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Moo Suk Park; Kyung Young Chung; Kil Dong Kim; Woo Ick Yang; Jae Ho Chung; Young Sam Kim; Joon Chang; Joo Hang Kim; Sung Kyu Kim; Se Kyu Kim Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Hyun-Sung Lee; Hee-Jin Jang; Rohan Shah; David Yoon; Masatsugu Hamaji; Ori Wald; Ju-Seog Lee; David J Sugarbaker; Bryan M Burt Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-04-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Fabio Conforti; Xu Zhang; Guanhua Rao; Tommaso De Pas; Yoko Yonemori; Jose Antonio Rodriguez; Justine N McCutcheon; Raneen Rahhal; Anna T Alberobello; Yisong Wang; Yu-Wen Zhang; Udayan Guha; Giuseppe Giaccone Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2017-08-17 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Iacopo Petrini; Paul S Meltzer; In-Kyu Kim; Marco Lucchi; Kang-Seo Park; Gabriella Fontanini; James Gao; Paolo A Zucali; Fiorella Calabrese; Adolfo Favaretto; Federico Rea; Jaime Rodriguez-Canales; Robert L Walker; Marbin Pineda; Yuelin J Zhu; Christopher Lau; Keith J Killian; Sven Bilke; Donna Voeller; Sivanesan Dakshanamurthy; Yisong Wang; Giuseppe Giaccone Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2014-06-29 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Milan Radovich; Jeffrey P Solzak; Bradley A Hancock; Madison L Conces; Rutuja Atale; Ryan F Porter; Jin Zhu; Jarret Glasscock; Kenneth A Kesler; Sunil S Badve; Bryan P Schneider; Patrick J Loehrer Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-01-14 Impact factor: 7.640