Literature DB >> 12124843

New WHO histologic classification predicts prognosis of thymic epithelial tumors: a clinicopathologic study of 200 thymoma cases from China.

Gang Chen1, Alexander Marx, Wen-Hu Chen, Jiang Yong, Bernhard Puppe, Philipp Stroebel, Hans Konrad Mueller-Hermelink.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In 1999, a World Health Organization (WHO) committee published histologic criteria for distinct thymoma entities (labeled as Type A, AB, B1, B2, B3 thymomas) and for the heterogeneous group of thymic carcinomas, collectively called Type C thymomas. Whether WHO-defined histologic thymoma subtypes are of independent prognostic relevance has yet to be proved.
METHODS: Two hundred thymomas from the Shanghai Chest Hospital with a mean follow-up time of 15 years (range, 1-246 months) were studied for the relevance of WHO histologic subtype and other factors (stage, therapy, and myasthenia gravis [MG]) for survival.
RESULTS: In order of frequency, 68 patients (34.0%) had Type AB, 39 (19.5%) had Type B2, 36 (18.0%) had Type C, 27 (13.5%) had Type B3, 17 (8.5%) had Type B1, and 8 (4.0%) had Type A thymoma. Five cases (2.5%) were rare thymomas not mentioned in the WHO classification. Survival data showed significant differences among the histologic subtypes (log rank test: P < 0.001). Among patients with Type A and AB thymomas, none died of tumor; of the Type B1 thymoma patients, only one (5.9%) died at 22 months. Type B2, B3, and C thymomas had a significantly worse prognosis with 5-year survival rates of 75.0%, 70.0%, and 48.0%, respectively. Ninety-six patients (48.0%) were in Masaoka Stage I, 26 (13.0%) were in Stage II, 65 (32.5%) were in Stage III, and 13 (6.5%) were in Stage IV. Stage was highly significant in predicting survival (log rank, test P < 0.001). The association between histologic subtype and invasive behavior (stage) was statistically significant (P < 0.001). However, histology was an independent predictive factor of survival in Stage I and II thymomas: Type B2, B3, and C thymomas had a worse prognosis than Type A, AB, and B1 thymomas (log rank test: P < 0.003). Thirty patients (15.0%) presented with MG. MG was significantly more frequent in Type B2 and B3 than in Type A, AB, and B1 thymomas (P < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, MG had no adverse effect on survival (P = 0.17). Radiation or chemotherapy improved patients' survival at 5 and 10 years in Type B2, B3, and C thymomas (log rank test: P < 0.003).
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor stage is the most important determinant of survival in thymoma patients, but the WHO histologic subtype is an independent prognostic factor in Stage I and II thymomas, among which WHO Type A, AB, and B1 thymomas form a low-risk group. Patients with high-risk thymomas might profit from novel adjuvant radiochemotherapy regimens. Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society.DOI 10.1002/cncr.10665

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12124843     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.10665

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  90 in total

1.  The World Health Organization (WHO) histologic classification of thymomas: a reanalysis.

Authors:  Cesar A Moran; Saul Suster
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-02-04

2.  (18)F-FDG PET for the evaluation of thymic epithelial tumors: Correlation with the World Health Organization classification in addition to dual-time-point imaging.

Authors:  Atsuo Inoue; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Mitsuaki Tatsumi; Naoki Ikeda; Meinoshin Okumura; Hiroyuki Shiono; Masayoshi Inoue; Ichiro Higuchi; Katsuyuki Aozasa; Takeshi Johkoh; Hironobu Nakamura; Jun Hatazawa
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2009-02-14       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  MR imaging of thymic epithelial tumors: correlation with World Health Organization classification.

Authors:  Atsuo Inoue; Noriyuki Tomiyama; Kiminori Fujimoto; Junko Sadohara; Itsuko Nakamichi; Yasuhiko Tomita; Katsuyuki Aozasa; Mitsuko Tsubamoto; Sachiko Murai; Javzandulam Natsag; Hiromitsu Sumikawa; Naoki Mihara; Osamu Honda; Seiki Hamada; Takeshi Johkoh; Hironobu Nakamura
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2006-04

4.  Texture analysis of 18F-FDG PET/CT for grading thymic epithelial tumours: usefulness of combining SUV and texture parameters.

Authors:  Masatoyo Nakajo; Megumi Jinguji; Tetsuya Shinaji; Masayuki Nakajo; Masaya Aoki; Atsushi Tani; Masami Sato; Takashi Yoshiura
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 5.  Pediatric thymomas: report of two cases and comprehensive review of the literature.

Authors:  Annabelle L Fonseca; Doruk E Ozgediz; Emily R Christison-Lagay; Frank C Detterbeck; Michael G Caty
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 1.827

6.  18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the management of patients with thymic epithelial tumors.

Authors:  Anish Thomas; Esther Mena; Karen Kurdziel; David Venzon; Sean Khozin; Arlene W Berman; Peter Choyke; Eva Szabo; Arun Rajan; Giuseppe Giaccone
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 12.531

7.  Long lasting efficacy of sorafenib in a heavily pretreated patient with thymic carcinoma.

Authors:  Thomas Neuhaus; Joachim Luyken
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2012-10-23       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Type AB thymoma is not a mixed tumor of type A and type B thymomas, but a distinct type of thymoma.

Authors:  Yukari Miki; Kana Hamada; Tadashi Yoshino; Katsuya Miyatani; Kiyoshi Takahashi
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 4.064

9.  Diagnostic reproducibility of thymic epithelial tumors using the World Health Organization classification: note for thoracic clinicians.

Authors:  Noriaki Sakakura; Hisashi Tateyama; Shigeo Nakamura; Tetsuo Taniguchi; Noriyasu Usami; Yoshinori Ishikawa; Koji Kawaguchi; Kohei Yokoi
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-12-12

10.  Thymic neoplasm: a rare disease with a complex clinical presentation.

Authors:  Omar M Rashid; Anthony D Cassano; Kazuaki Takabe
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.