AIM: To investigate general practitioners' (GPs) preferences for involvement in the management of people diagnosed with the seven most frequent cancers and any barriers to or concerns about an expanded role for GPs. METHODS: A self-report survey was mailed to a random sample of 1969 Australian GPs. RESULTS: In all, 33% (648) of GPs participated. Participants were a median of 50 years and worked 38 h per week; 53% were male and 68% practiced in metropolitan areas. Most participants preferred to be involved in cancer prevention (86%) and initial diagnosis (85%). Fewer were interested in monitoring for recurrence (70%), follow up after treatment (68%), coordinating psychological support (70%) and palliative care (68%). Only 52% of GPs had a preference for providing supportive care to manage the symptoms of cancer treatment, 45% for managing postoperative care and 40% for coordinating treatment. On multivariate analysis, preference for involvement in more aspects of cancer management increased with age (P = 0.030), if the GP practiced in rural compared to metropolitan areas (P = 0.005), was a partner in a practice compared to a sole practitioner (P = 0.003), had previously received cancer-specific training (P < 0.001) or was interested in future training (P < 0.001). Open responses identified limited time, communication and information transfer between GP and specialists as important barriers to involvement in cancer management. CONCLUSION: While many GPs are currently involved in some aspects of cancer management, with training, good communication and support from specialists this role may be successfully expanded.
AIM: To investigate general practitioners' (GPs) preferences for involvement in the management of people diagnosed with the seven most frequent cancers and any barriers to or concerns about an expanded role for GPs. METHODS: A self-report survey was mailed to a random sample of 1969 Australian GPs. RESULTS: In all, 33% (648) of GPs participated. Participants were a median of 50 years and worked 38 h per week; 53% were male and 68% practiced in metropolitan areas. Most participants preferred to be involved in cancer prevention (86%) and initial diagnosis (85%). Fewer were interested in monitoring for recurrence (70%), follow up after treatment (68%), coordinating psychological support (70%) and palliative care (68%). Only 52% of GPs had a preference for providing supportive care to manage the symptoms of cancer treatment, 45% for managing postoperative care and 40% for coordinating treatment. On multivariate analysis, preference for involvement in more aspects of cancer management increased with age (P = 0.030), if the GP practiced in rural compared to metropolitan areas (P = 0.005), was a partner in a practice compared to a sole practitioner (P = 0.003), had previously received cancer-specific training (P < 0.001) or was interested in future training (P < 0.001). Open responses identified limited time, communication and information transfer between GP and specialists as important barriers to involvement in cancer management. CONCLUSION: While many GPs are currently involved in some aspects of cancer management, with training, good communication and support from specialists this role may be successfully expanded.
Authors: Marie Bakitas; Kristen Allen Watts; Emily Malone; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Susan McCammon; Richard Taylor; Rodney Tucker; Ronit Elk Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-02-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Judith A Meiklejohn; Alexander Mimery; Jennifer H Martin; Ross Bailie; Gail Garvey; Euan T Walpole; Jon Adams; Daniel Williamson; Patricia C Valery Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-05-02 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Moyez Jiwa; Anne Long; Tim Shaw; Georgina Pagey; Georgia Halkett; Vinita Pillai; Xingqiong Meng Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2014-09-03 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Jan Ho; Annette McWilliams; Jon Emery; Christobel Saunders; Christopher Reid; Suzanne Robinson; Fraser Brims Journal: BMJ Open Respir Res Date: 2017-06-12