Literature DB >> 23278996

Management of patients with long-term inhibitors: is immune tolerance an underestimated life-long solution?

G Di Minno1, A Coppola.   

Abstract

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is recognized as the first choice treatment in haemophilic patients with inhibitors, with the aim of restoring safe and effective standard factor VIII replacement and, particularly, prophylaxis in children. For the latter, literature data and clinical practice support the optimal cost utility ratio of ITI. Indeed, the high success rate, the low incidence of inhibitor recurrence after successful ITI and the possibility of preventing joint deterioration, enable one to predict a considerable long-term reduction of costs in the majority of treated patients. Therefore, in spite of high costs and open issues about optimal regimens, ITI is actually attempted in virtually all children with inhibitors. Few patients with long-standing inhibitors presently undergo ITI, particularly in the case of severe bleeding tendency. In this setting, uncertainties concerning management are amplified by the paucity of literature data and psychological reluctance by both patients and treaters due to the perceived poor prognosis and the demanding treatment (also in terms of costs). However, clinical data suggest that the role of age at ITI start and of time interval from inhibitor diagnosis, as predictors of ITI outcome, should be considered in a larger framework of proposed and more established prognostic factors. Moreover, optimising ITI management, particularly with respect to inhibitor titre at ITI start and avoidance of adverse events or interruption of treatment, may also contribute to improve outcomes. Although the economic constraints of the present era significantly affect resources for such a high-cost treatment, the individual cost-utility ratio (bleeding tendency and risk of fatal bleeding, arthropathy and need for orthopaedic surgery, comorbidities, quality of life) should be assessed carefully to determine whether ITI is a suitable option and thus not preclude adults from the opportunity of inhibitor eradication.
© 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23278996     DOI: 10.1111/hae.12052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemophilia        ISSN: 1351-8216            Impact factor:   4.287


  3 in total

1.  [Study on risk factors and follow-up of 26 hemophilia A children with inhibitors].

Authors:  W Liu; F Xue; L Zhang; X F Liu; Y F Chen; Y T Huang; R F Fu; R C Yang
Journal:  Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2016-06-14

Review 2.  Inhibitors in haemophilia A and B: Management of bleeds, inhibitor eradication and strategies for difficult-to-treat patients.

Authors:  Rolf Ljung; Guenter Auerswald; Gary Benson; Gerry Dolan; Anne Duffy; Cedric Hermans; Victor Jiménez-Yuste; Thierry Lambert; Massimo Morfini; Silva Zupančić-Šalek; Elena Santagostino
Journal:  Eur J Haematol       Date:  2018-12-06       Impact factor: 2.997

3.  Low-dose immune tolerance induction alone or with immunosuppressants according to prognostic risk factors in Chinese children with hemophilia A inhibitors.

Authors:  Zekun Li; Zhenping Chen; Guoqing Liu; Xiaoling Cheng; Wanru Yao; Kun Huang; Gang Li; Yingzi Zhen; Xinyi Wu; Siyu Cai; Man-Chiu Poon; Runhui Wu
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2021-07-14
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.