Literature DB >> 23278485

Effects of fluid flow conditions on interactions between species in biofilms.

Wei Zhang1, Tadas Sileika, Aaron I Packman.   

Abstract

Most microorganisms live in complex communities, where they interact both synergistically and competitively. To explore the relationship between environmental heterogeneity and the spatial structure of well-defined biofilms, single- and mixed-species biofilms of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 and Flavobacterium sp. CDC-65 was grown in a planar flow cell under highly controlled flow gradients. Both organisms behaved differently in mixed cultures than in single-species cultures due to inter-species interactions, and these interactions were significantly affected by external flow conditions. Pseudomonas and Flavobacterium showed a competitive relationship under slow inflow conditions, where the supply of growth medium was limited. Under such competitive conditions, the faster- specific growth rate of Flavobacterium allowed it to secure access to favorable regions of the biofilm by overgrowing Pseudomonas. In contrast, Pseudomonas was restricted to nutritionally depleted habitat near the base of the biofilm, and its growth was significantly inhibited. Conversely, under higher inflow conditions providing greater influx of growth medium, both organisms accumulated greater biomass in mixed biofilms than in single-species biofilms. Spatial segregation of the two organisms within the biofilms contributed to enhanced overall exploitation of available nutrients and substrates, while morphological changes favored better adherence to the surface under high hydrodynamic shear. These results indicate that synergy and competition in biofilms vary with flow conditions. Limited resource replenishment favors competition under low-flow conditions, while high flow reduces competition and favors synergy by providing greater resources and simultaneously imposing increased hydrodynamic shear that makes it more difficult to accumulate biomass on the surface. Ecological interactions that produce mechanically stronger and more robust biofilms will support more extensive growth on surfaces subject to high hydrodynamic shear, but these interactions are difficult to predict from observations of the behavior of individual organisms.
© 2012 Federation of European Microbiological Societies. Published by Blackwell Publishing Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23278485      PMCID: PMC3622810          DOI: 10.1111/1574-6941.12066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol        ISSN: 0168-6496            Impact factor:   4.194


  32 in total

Review 1.  Microbial interactions involving sulfur bacteria: implications for the ecology and evolution of bacterial communities.

Authors:  J Overmann; H van Gemerden
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 16.408

2.  Experimental reproducibility in flow-chamber biofilms.

Authors:  A Heydorn; B K Ersbøll; M Hentzer; M R Parsek; M Givskov; S Molin
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 3.  Microbial biofilms: from ecology to molecular genetics.

Authors:  M E Davey; G A O'toole
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  Oral microbial communities: biofilms, interactions, and genetic systems.

Authors:  P E Kolenbrander
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 15.500

5.  Phylogenetic Composition, Spatial Structure, and Dynamics of Lotic Bacterial Biofilms Investigated by Fluorescent in Situ Hybridization and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Microb Ecol       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.552

6.  Contributions of microbial biofilms to ecosystem processes in stream mesocosms.

Authors:  Tom J Battin; Louis A Kaplan; J Denis Newbold; Claude M E Hansen
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-11-27       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Evolution of species interactions in a biofilm community.

Authors:  Susse Kirkelund Hansen; Paul B Rainey; Janus A J Haagensen; Søren Molin
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Complete genome sequence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1, an opportunistic pathogen.

Authors:  C K Stover; X Q Pham; A L Erwin; S D Mizoguchi; P Warrener; M J Hickey; F S Brinkman; W O Hufnagle; D J Kowalik; M Lagrou; R L Garber; L Goltry; E Tolentino; S Westbrock-Wadman; Y Yuan; L L Brody; S N Coulter; K R Folger; A Kas; K Larbig; R Lim; K Smith; D Spencer; G K Wong; Z Wu; I T Paulsen; J Reizer; M H Saier; R E Hancock; S Lory; M V Olson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-08-31       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Influence of hydrodynamics and cell signaling on the structure and behavior of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms.

Authors:  B Purevdorj; J W Costerton; P Stoodley
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  Quorum sensing and motility mediate interactions between Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Agrobacterium tumefaciens in biofilm cocultures.

Authors:  Dingding An; Thomas Danhorn; Clay Fuqua; Matthew R Parsek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-02-28       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  The ecology and biogeochemistry of stream biofilms.

Authors:  Tom J Battin; Katharina Besemer; Mia M Bengtsson; Anna M Romani; Aaron I Packmann
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 60.633

Review 2.  What makes another life possible in bacteria? Global regulators as architects of bacterial biofilms.

Authors:  Nefise Akçelik; Mustafa Akçelik
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 4.253

Review 3.  Biofilm models of polymicrobial infection.

Authors:  Rebecca A Gabrilska; Kendra P Rumbaugh
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2015-11-23       Impact factor: 3.165

4.  In Situ Biomineralization and Particle Deposition Distinctively Mediate Biofilm Susceptibility to Chlorine.

Authors:  Xiaobao Li; David L Chopp; William A Russin; Paul T Brannon; Matthew R Parsek; Aaron I Packman
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Microbial competition in porous environments can select against rapid biofilm growth.

Authors:  Katharine Z Coyte; Hervé Tabuteau; Eamonn A Gaffney; Kevin R Foster; William M Durham
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Co-culture with Listeria monocytogenes within a dual-species biofilm community strongly increases resistance of Pseudomonas putida to benzalkonium chloride.

Authors:  Efstathios Giaouris; Nikos Chorianopoulos; Agapi Doulgeraki; George-John Nychas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-10       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa promotes Escherichia coli biofilm formation in nutrient-limited medium.

Authors:  Alessandro Culotti; Aaron I Packman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Intrinsic and Extrinsic Aspects on Campylobacter jejuni Biofilms.

Authors:  Roberta T Melo; Eliane P Mendonça; Guilherme P Monteiro; Mariana C Siqueira; Clara B Pereira; Phelipe A B M Peres; Heriberto Fernandez; Daise A Rossi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.640

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.