Literature DB >> 23277691

Effects of high-impact training and detraining on femoral neck structure in premenopausal women: a hip structural analysis of an 18-month randomized controlled exercise intervention with 3.5-year follow-up.

Ari Heinonen1, Jyri Mäntynen, Pekka Kannus, Kirsti Uusi-Rasi, Riku Nikander, Saija Kontulainen, Harri Sievänen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the training effects of an 18-month exercise intervention and subsequent 3.5-year follow-up on femoral neck structure in premenopausal women.
METHODS: Of 98 women who participated in this randomized controlled study, 84 (39 trainees and 45 controls) completed the 18-month intervention. At both 18 months and 3.5 years, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data on 22 trainees and 22 control participants (ages 35-45 y) were available for hip structural analysis. The section modulus (Z), cross-sectional area (CSA), and subperiosteal width at the femoral neck were analyzed. Lower-leg explosive power and estimated maximal oxygen uptake (Vo(2)max) were assessed by vertical countermovement jump and standardized 2 km walking test, respectively. Progressive supervised high-impact exercises were done three times per week for 18 months.
RESULTS: Significant between-group differences in favour of trainees were observed after the 18-month intervention in Z (3.2%, p=0.047) and CSA (2.8%, p=0.043). At the 3.5-year follow-up point, the exercise-induced benefits in Z and CSA had diminished and were statistically insignificant. A between-group difference in favour of trainees was observed in lower-limb power after intervention (4.2%, p=0.002) and at 3.5-year follow-up (5.1%, p=0.003). A similar difference was seen in estimated Vo(2)max (5.6% after intervention, p=0.002, and 4.6% at 3.5-y follow-up, p=0.005).
CONCLUSION: The 18-month high-impact exercise intervention strengthened the femoral neck in premenopausal women by enhancing its structural properties; however, this benefit was not maintained at 3.5-year follow-up. In contrast, the exercise benefits on physical performance continued to be maintained 3.5 years after intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bone and bones; bone mineral density; exercise; osteoporosis; women

Year:  2012        PMID: 23277691      PMCID: PMC3280715          DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2010-37

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Can        ISSN: 0300-0508            Impact factor:   1.037


  51 in total

1.  Have the DXA-based exercise studies seriously underestimated the effects of mechanical loading on bone?

Authors:  T L Järvinen; P Kannus; H Sievänen
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 2.  Systematic review of randomized trials of the effect of exercise on bone mass in pre- and postmenopausal women.

Authors:  B A Wallace; R G Cumming
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Effects of high-impact exercise on bone mineral density: a randomized controlled trial in premenopausal women.

Authors:  Aki Vainionpää; Raija Korpelainen; Juhani Leppäluoto; Timo Jämsä
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-06-17       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  Effects of resistance and endurance exercise on bone mineral status of young women: a randomized exercise intervention trial.

Authors:  C Snow-Harter; M L Bouxsein; B T Lewis; D R Carter; R Marcus
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 6.741

5.  American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Exercise and physical activity for older adults.

Authors:  Wojtek J Chodzko-Zajko; David N Proctor; Maria A Fiatarone Singh; Christopher T Minson; Claudio R Nigg; George J Salem; James S Skinner
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Is bone mineral density advantage maintained long-term in previous weight lifters?

Authors:  M K Karlsson; O Johnell; K J Obrant
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.333

7.  Prediction of change in maximal aerobic power by the 2-km walk test after walking training in middle-aged adults.

Authors:  R M Laukkanen; T K Kukkonen-Harjula; P Oja; M E Pasanen; I M Vuori
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 3.118

Review 8.  Immobilization and bone structure in humans.

Authors:  Harri Sievänen
Journal:  Arch Biochem Biophys       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.013

9.  A 2-km walking test for assessing the cardiorespiratory fitness of healthy adults.

Authors:  P Oja; R Laukkanen; M Pasanen; T Tyry; I Vuori
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.118

10.  Exercise and lumbar spine bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Authors:  George A Kelley; Kristi S Kelley; Zung Vu Tran
Journal:  J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.053

View more
  4 in total

1.  Effects of a 20-week high-intensity strength and sprint training program on tibial bone structure and strength in middle-aged and older male sprint athletes: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  T H Suominen; M T Korhonen; M Alén; A Heinonen; A Mero; T Törmäkangas; H Suominen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2017-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Effect of progressive high-impact exercise on femoral neck structural strength in postmenopausal women with mild knee osteoarthritis: a 12-month RCT.

Authors:  J Multanen; T Rantalainen; H Kautiainen; R Ahola; T Jämsä; M T Nieminen; E Lammentausta; A Häkkinen; I Kiviranta; A Heinonen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 3.  Effects of Low Energy Availability on Bone Health in Endurance Athletes and High-Impact Exercise as A Potential Countermeasure: A Narrative Review.

Authors:  Mark J Hutson; Emma O'Donnell; Katherine Brooke-Wavell; Craig Sale; Richard C Blagrove
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2021-03       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  Protocol for a randomized controlled trial to compare bone-loading exercises with risedronate for preventing bone loss in osteopenic postmenopausal women.

Authors:  Laura D Bilek; Nancy L Waltman; Joan M Lappe; Kevin A Kupzyk; Lynn R Mack; Diane M Cullen; Kris Berg; Meghan Langel; Melissa Meisinger; Ashlee Portelli-Trinidad; Molly Lang
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 2.809

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.