George A Kelley1, Kristi S Kelley, Zung Vu Tran. 1. Clinical Investigation Program, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. gakelley@bics.bwh.harvard.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Low bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine is a major public health problem among postmenopausal women. We conducted a meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) to examine the effects of exercise on lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women. METHODS: IPD were requested from a previously developed database of summary means from randomized and nonrandomized trials dealing with the effects of exercise on BMD. Two-way analysis of variance tests with pairwise comparisons (p < or =.05) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to determine the statistical significance for changes in lumbar spine BMD. RESULTS: Across 13 trials that included 699 subjects (355 exercise, 344 control), a statistically significant interaction was found between test and group (F = 15.232, p =.000). Pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni t tests) revealed a statistically significant increase in final minus initial BMD for the exercise group ( +/- SD = 0.005 +/- 0.043 g/cm(2), t = 2.46, p =.014, 95% CI = 0.001-0.009) and a statistically significant decrease in final minus initial BMD for the control group ( +/- SD = -0.007 +/- 0.045 g/cm(2), t = -3.051, p =.002, 95% CI = -0.012--0.002). Changes were equivalent to an approximate 2% benefit in lumbar spine BMD (exercise, +1%, control, -1%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this IPD meta-analysis suggest that exercise helps to improve and maintain lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Low bone mineral density (BMD) at the lumbar spine is a major public health problem among postmenopausal women. We conducted a meta-analysis of individual patient data (IPD) to examine the effects of exercise on lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women. METHODS: IPD were requested from a previously developed database of summary means from randomized and nonrandomized trials dealing with the effects of exercise on BMD. Two-way analysis of variance tests with pairwise comparisons (p < or =.05) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to determine the statistical significance for changes in lumbar spine BMD. RESULTS: Across 13 trials that included 699 subjects (355 exercise, 344 control), a statistically significant interaction was found between test and group (F = 15.232, p =.000). Pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni t tests) revealed a statistically significant increase in final minus initial BMD for the exercise group ( +/- SD = 0.005 +/- 0.043 g/cm(2), t = 2.46, p =.014, 95% CI = 0.001-0.009) and a statistically significant decrease in final minus initial BMD for the control group ( +/- SD = -0.007 +/- 0.045 g/cm(2), t = -3.051, p =.002, 95% CI = -0.012--0.002). Changes were equivalent to an approximate 2% benefit in lumbar spine BMD (exercise, +1%, control, -1%). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this IPD meta-analysis suggest that exercise helps to improve and maintain lumbar spine BMD in postmenopausal women.
Authors: Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Jacques P Brown; Michel Fortier; Heather Frame; André Lalonde; Alexandra Papaioannou; Vyta Senikas; Chui Kin Yuen Journal: J Obstet Gynaecol Can Date: 2006-02
Authors: Ryan P Farmer; Benoit Herbert; Derly O Cuellar; Jiandong Hao; Philip F Stahel; Robin Yasui; David J Hak; Cyril Mauffrey Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2014-03-21 Impact factor: 3.075
Authors: Nelson B Watts; John P Bilezikian; Pauline M Camacho; Susan L Greenspan; Steven T Harris; Stephen F Hodgson; Michael Kleerekoper; Marjorie M Luckey; Michael R McClung; Rachel Pessah Pollack; Steven M Petak Journal: Endocr Pract Date: 2010 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 3.443
Authors: Riku Nikander; Harri Sievänen; Ari Heinonen; Robin M Daly; Kirsti Uusi-Rasi; Pekka Kannus Journal: BMC Med Date: 2010-07-21 Impact factor: 8.775