Literature DB >> 23277394

Molecular analysis of the bacterial microbiome in the forestomach fluid from the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius).

Vaibhav D Bhatt1, Suchitra S Dande, Nitin V Patil, Chaitanya G Joshi.   

Abstract

Rumen microorganisms play an important role in ruminant digestion and absorption of nutrients and have great potential applications in the field of rumen adjusting, food fermentation and biomass utilization etc. In order to investigate the composition of microorganisms in the rumen of camel (Camelus dromedarius), this study delves in the microbial diversity by culture-independent approach. It includes comparison of rumen samples investigated in the present study to other currently available metagenomes to reveal potential differences in rumen microbial systems. Pyrosequencing based metagenomics was applied to analyze phylogenetic and metabolic profiles by MG-RAST, a web based tool. Pyrosequencing of camel rumen sample yielded 8,979,755 nucleotides assembled to 41,905 sequence reads with an average read length of 214 nucleotides. Taxonomic analysis of metagenomic reads indicated Bacteroidetes (55.5 %), Firmicutes (22.7 %) and Proteobacteria (9.2 %) phyla as predominant camel rumen taxa. At a finer phylogenetic resolution, Bacteroides species dominated the camel rumen metagenome. Functional analysis revealed that clustering-based subsystem and carbohydrate metabolism were the most abundant SEED subsystem representing 17 and 13 % of camel metagenome, respectively. A high taxonomic and functional similarity of camel rumen was found with the cow metagenome which is not surprising given the fact that both are mammalian herbivores with similar digestive tract structures and functions. Combined pyrosequencing approach and subsystems-based annotations available in the SEED database allowed us access to understand the metabolic potential of these microbiomes. Altogether, these data suggest that agricultural and animal husbandry practices can impose significant selective pressures on the rumen microbiota regardless of rumen type. The present study provides a baseline for understanding the complexity of camel rumen microbial ecology while also highlighting striking similarities and differences when compared to other animal gastrointestinal environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23277394     DOI: 10.1007/s11033-012-2411-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Biol Rep        ISSN: 0301-4851            Impact factor:   2.316


  23 in total

1.  Physiological characterization of SusG, an outer membrane protein essential for starch utilization by Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron.

Authors:  J A Shipman; K H Cho; H A Siegel; A A Salyers
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.490

Review 2.  Factors that alter rumen microbial ecology.

Authors:  J B Russell; J L Rychlik
Journal:  Science       Date:  2001-05-11       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 3.  Metagenomics: application of genomics to uncultured microorganisms.

Authors:  Jo Handelsman
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 11.056

Review 4.  Invited review: adhesion mechanisms of rumen cellulolytic bacteria.

Authors:  J Miron; D Ben-Ghedalia; M Morrison
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.034

Review 5.  How many ruminal bacteria are there?

Authors:  D O Krause; J B Russell
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 4.034

6.  Phylogenetic analysis of archaea in three fractions of cow rumen based on the 16S rDNA sequence.

Authors:  Eun Chule Shin; Byoung Rock Choi; Woo Jin Lim; Su Young Hong; Chang Long An; Kye Man Cho; Young Kyun Kim; Jin Mee An; Jung Mi Kang; Sung Sill Lee; Hoon Kim; Han Dae Yun
Journal:  Anaerobe       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.331

7.  Mucosal glycan foraging enhances fitness and transmission of a saccharolytic human gut bacterial symbiont.

Authors:  Eric C Martens; Herbert C Chiang; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 21.023

8.  Honor thy symbionts.

Authors:  Jian Xu; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 9.  Bacteroides: the good, the bad, and the nitty-gritty.

Authors:  Hannah M Wexler
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes.

Authors:  Ruth E Ley; Micah Hamady; Catherine Lozupone; Peter J Turnbaugh; Rob Roy Ramey; J Stephen Bircher; Michael L Schlegel; Tammy A Tucker; Mark D Schrenzel; Rob Knight; Jeffrey I Gordon
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-22       Impact factor: 47.728

View more
  12 in total

1.  Rumen bacterial diversity of 80 to 110-day-old goats using 16S rRNA sequencing.

Authors:  Xufeng Han; Yuxin Yang; Hailong Yan; Xiaolong Wang; Lei Qu; Yulin Chen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Metagenomic analysis of the Rhinopithecus bieti fecal microbiome reveals a broad diversity of bacterial and glycoside hydrolase profiles related to lignocellulose degradation.

Authors:  Bo Xu; Weijiang Xu; Junjun Li; Liming Dai; Caiyun Xiong; Xianghua Tang; Yunjuan Yang; Yuelin Mu; Junpei Zhou; Junmei Ding; Qian Wu; Zunxi Huang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 3.969

3.  Characterization of the gut microbiota in the golden takin (Budorcas taxicolor bedfordi).

Authors:  Jun Chen; Huanxin Zhang; Xiaoyang Wu; Shuai Shang; Jiakuo Yan; Yao Chen; Honghai Zhang; Xuexi Tang
Journal:  AMB Express       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 3.298

4.  Comparative analysis of fecal microbial communities in cattle and Bactrian camels.

Authors:  Liang Ming; Li Yi; Surong Hasi; Jing He; Le Hai; Zhaoxia Wang; Fucheng Guo; Xiangyu Qiao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  A rather dry subject; investigating the study of arid-associated microbial communities.

Authors:  Peter Osborne; Lindsay J Hall; Noga Kronfeld-Schor; David Thybert; Wilfried Haerty
Journal:  Environ Microbiome       Date:  2020-12-01

6.  Characterizing the bacterial microbiota in different gastrointestinal tract segments of the Bactrian camel.

Authors:  Jing He; Li Yi; Le Hai; Liang Ming; Wanting Gao; Rimutu Ji
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Two new gene clusters involved in the degradation of plant cell wall from the fecal microbiota of Tunisian dromedary.

Authors:  Rihab Ameri; Elisabeth Laville; Gabrielle Potocki-Véronèse; Sahar Trabelsi; Monia Mezghani; Fatma Elgharbi; Samir Bejar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Metagenomics of pigmented and cholesterol gallstones: the putative role of bacteria.

Authors:  S H Kose; K Grice; W D Orsi; M Ballal; M J L Coolen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Comparative analysis of the metabolically active microbial communities in the rumen of dromedary camels under different feeding systems using total rRNA sequencing.

Authors:  Alaa Emara Rabee; Robert Forster; Chijioke Elekwachi; Ebrahim Sabra; Mebarek Lamara
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.984

10.  Characterizing rumen microbiota and CAZyme profile of Indian dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius) in response to different roughages.

Authors:  Ankit T Hinsu; Nilam J Tulsani; Ketankumar J Panchal; Ramesh J Pandit; Basanti Jyotsana; Nishant A Dafale; Niteen V Patil; Hemant J Purohit; Chaitanya G Joshi; Subhash J Jakhesara
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.