Literature DB >> 23276565

Mosaic trisomy 2 at amniocentesis: prenatal diagnosis and molecular genetic analysis.

Chih-Ping Chen1, Yi-Ning Su, Schu-Rern Chern, Yu-Ting Chen, Peih-Shan Wu, Jun-Wei Su, Chen-Wen Pan, Wayseen Wang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims at presenting prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 2 and reviewing the literature. MATERIALS, METHODS, AND
RESULTS: A 32-year-old woman underwent amniocentesis at 21 weeks of gestation because of abnormal maternal serum biochemistry. Amniocentesis revealed a karyotype of 47,XY,+2[1]/46,XY[21] in in situ cultures. The single colony with trisomy 2 had two metaphase cells, and both had the karyotype of 47,XY,+2. Repeated amniocentesis was performed at 23 weeks of gestation. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis on uncultured amniocytes using a 2q11.1-specific probe RP11-468G5 (spectrum green) showed three green signals in 11 of 47 uncultured amniocytes, indicating 23.4% mosaicism for trisomy 2. The cultured amniocytes had a karyotype of 46,XY[20 colonies]. Polymorphic DNA marker analysis excluded uniparental disomy 2. The woman underwent the third amniocentesis at 25 weeks of gestation. Interphase FISH analysis on uncultured amniocytes revealed 9.4% (5/53 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 2. The cultured amniocytes had a karyotype of 46,XY[30 colonies]. Prenatal ultrasound was normal. The parents decided to continue the pregnancy to term, and a 3316-g baby was delivered with no phenotypic abnormalities. Cord blood had a karyotype of 46,XY[40 cells]. Interphase FISH analysis on uncultured urinary cells revealed 8.2% (4/49 cells) mosaicism for trisomy 2. The neonate was normal in growth and psychomotor development at 6 months of age.
CONCLUSION: Prenatal diagnosis of a single colony with two or more cells with trisomy 2 at amniocentesis should alert a clinically significant aneuploidy, and interphase FISH on uncultured amniocytes is useful for rapid confirmation of low-level trisomy 2 mosaicism at amniocentesis. The abnormal cell line of trisomy 2 may disappear after long-term amniocyte cultures.
Copyright © 2012. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23276565     DOI: 10.1016/j.tjog.2012.09.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 1028-4559            Impact factor:   1.705


  6 in total

1.  Prenatal diagnosis of mosaic trisomy 2 and literature review.

Authors:  Ting Wang; Jufei Lian; Congmian Ren; Huamei Huang; Yanlin Huang; Ling Xu; Laiping Zheng; Chanhui Cai; Li Guo
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 2.009

2.  The significance of trisomy 7 mosaicism in noninvasive prenatal screening.

Authors:  Yiming Qi; Jiexia Yang; Yaping Hou; Fangfang Guo; Haishan Peng; Dongmei Wang; Qianyi Du; Aihua Yin
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.639

3.  Integrated CNV-seq, karyotyping and SNP-array analyses for effective prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism.

Authors:  Na Ma; Hui Xi; Jing Chen; Ying Peng; Zhengjun Jia; Shuting Yang; Jiancheng Hu; Jialun Pang; Yanan Zhang; Rong Hu; Hua Wang; Jing Liu
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 3.063

Review 4.  Chromosomal Mosaicism in Human Feto-Placental Development: Implications for Prenatal Diagnosis.

Authors:  Francesca Romana Grati
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  The birth of a baby with mosaicism resulting from a known mosaic embryo transfer: a case report.

Authors:  Semra Kahraman; Murat Cetinkaya; Beril Yuksel; Mesut Yesil; Caroline Pirkevi Cetinkaya
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  2020-03-27       Impact factor: 6.918

6.  The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  MengZhe Hao; LeiLei Li; Han Zhang; LinLin Li; Ruizhi Liu; Yang Yu
Journal:  J Clin Lab Anal       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 3.124

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.