BACKGROUND: Visualization of the lymphatic system is challenging. Lymphatic imaging is a crucial diagnostic tool for benign and malignant lymphatic pathologies. Fluorescence-guided imaging allows selective lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification. There are a few fluorescence systems, but some drawbacks remain due to technical and ergonomic aspects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the new Fluobeam 800 imaging system. METHODS: After approval by the ethics committee, the system was evaluated for lymphography and SLN biopsy in an animal model. Five pigs each with 4 lymph node (LN) stations (n = 20 LN stations) were subjected to lymphatic imaging using indocyanine green (ICG). Additionally, the use of ICG was compared with ICG adsorbed to human serum albumin (ICG-HSA). Lymphatic vessels and SLN identification rates were measured. RESULTS: After injection, a clear fluorescence signal of the lymphatic vessels was visualized leading to the LN station. Overall, ICG fluorescence imaging identified a mean of 2.0 lymphatic vessels and 1.1 (range = 1-2) SLN in 20 of 20 LN stations. Reverse lymphography was feasible. A clinical difference in resolution was not detected between use of ICG-HSA and ICG. CONCLUSION: This is the first study analyzing the feasibility of the Fluobeam 800 imaging system allowing transcutaneous real-time imaging. It enables detection of the SLN by fluorescence retention with increased detection depth and resolution. After fixation to the ceiling, the ergonomics advanced for simultaneous field navigation and dissection. The new system can be applied for lymphatic imaging for lympatico-reconstructive surgery and SLN biopsy.
BACKGROUND: Visualization of the lymphatic system is challenging. Lymphatic imaging is a crucial diagnostic tool for benign and malignant lymphatic pathologies. Fluorescence-guided imaging allows selective lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymph node (SLN) identification. There are a few fluorescence systems, but some drawbacks remain due to technical and ergonomic aspects. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the new Fluobeam 800 imaging system. METHODS: After approval by the ethics committee, the system was evaluated for lymphography and SLN biopsy in an animal model. Five pigs each with 4 lymph node (LN) stations (n = 20 LN stations) were subjected to lymphatic imaging using indocyanine green (ICG). Additionally, the use of ICG was compared with ICG adsorbed to human serum albumin (ICG-HSA). Lymphatic vessels and SLN identification rates were measured. RESULTS: After injection, a clear fluorescence signal of the lymphatic vessels was visualized leading to the LN station. Overall, ICG fluorescence imaging identified a mean of 2.0 lymphatic vessels and 1.1 (range = 1-2) SLN in 20 of 20 LN stations. Reverse lymphography was feasible. A clinical difference in resolution was not detected between use of ICG-HSA and ICG. CONCLUSION: This is the first study analyzing the feasibility of the Fluobeam 800 imaging system allowing transcutaneous real-time imaging. It enables detection of the SLN by fluorescence retention with increased detection depth and resolution. After fixation to the ceiling, the ergonomics advanced for simultaneous field navigation and dissection. The new system can be applied for lymphatic imaging for lympatico-reconstructive surgery and SLN biopsy.
Authors: Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Merlijn Hutteman; Joost R van der Vorst; Cornelis J H van de Velde; John V Frangioni Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2013-07-23 Impact factor: 66.675
Authors: Suman B Mondal; Shengkui Gao; Nan Zhu; LeMoyne Habimana-Griffin; Walter J Akers; Rongguang Liang; Viktor Gruev; Julie Margenthaler; Samuel Achilefu Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2017-02-17 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Baowei Fei; Martin T Halicek; Xu Wang; Hongzheng Zhang; James V Little; Kelly R Magliocca; Mihir Patel; Christopher C Griffith; Mark W El-Deiry; Amy Y Chen Journal: Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc Date: 2017-07
Authors: Connor W Barth; Vidhi M Shah; Lei G Wang; Anas M Masillati; Adel Al-Fatease; Syed Zaki Husain Rizvi; Alexander L Antaris; Jonathan Sorger; Deepa A Rao; Adam W G Alani; Summer L Gibbs Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2022-03-28 Impact factor: 15.304
Authors: Baowei Fei; Guolan Lu; Xu Wang; Hongzheng Zhang; James V Little; Kelly R Magliocca; Amy Y Chen Journal: Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng Date: 2017-02-14
Authors: Connor W Barth; Vidhi M Shah; Lei G Wang; Alexander L Antaris; Alwin Klaassen; Jonathan Sorger; Deepa A Rao; Darcy A Kerr; Eric R Henderson; Adam W G Alani; Summer L Gibbs Journal: Adv Ther (Weinh) Date: 2021-05-13
Authors: Suman B Mondal; Shengkui Gao; Nan Zhu; Gail P Sudlow; Kexian Liang; Avik Som; Walter J Akers; Ryan C Fields; Julie Margenthaler; Rongguang Liang; Viktor Gruev; Samuel Achilefu Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2015-07-16 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Hyunah Cho; Clifford S Cho; Guilherme L Indig; Afsaneh Lavasanifar; Mohammad Reza Vakili; Glen S Kwon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-02-26 Impact factor: 3.240