BACKGROUND: The discard rate of kidneys recovered from deceased donors with acute renal failure (ARF) is higher compared with those without ARF mainly due to the uncertainty regarding short-term and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1-year patient, graft, and rejection-free survivals and renal function of transplantations performed with kidneys recovered from deceased donors with or without ARF, defined as serum creatinine level of more than 1.5 mg/dL. We performed multivariable analysis to evaluate whether ARF was an independent risk factor associated with inferior outcomes. RESULTS: Of a total of 1518 patients, 253 received kidneys from expanded-criteria donors (ECD; with ARF [n=116] and without ARF [n=137]) and 1265 from standard-criteria donors (SCD; with ARF [n=369] and without ARF [n=896]). The incidence of delayed graft function was higher in ECD (68.1% vs. 58.4%; P=0.072) and SCD (69.9% vs. 50.6%; P<0.001) recipients of kidneys with ARF compared with those without ARF, respectively. At 1 year, patient, graft, and rejection-free survivals were not statistically different in SCD or ECD recipients with or without ARF. Renal function at 1 year was similar in recipients of ECD (41.9±26.3 vs. 40.1±21.7 mL/min; P=0.565) or SCD (50.9±29.9 vs. 53.6±28.5 mL/min; P=0.131) kidneys with and without ARF, respectively. Compared with kidneys without ARF, receiving a kidney allograft with ARF was not associated with increased risk of death, graft lost, or inferior renal function 1 year after transplantation. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients, kidneys from deceased donors with ARF provided graft survival and renal function comparable with kidneys from donors without ARF 1 year after transplantation.
BACKGROUND: The discard rate of kidneys recovered from deceased donors with acute renal failure (ARF) is higher compared with those without ARF mainly due to the uncertainty regarding short-term and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 1-year patient, graft, and rejection-free survivals and renal function of transplantations performed with kidneys recovered from deceased donors with or without ARF, defined as serum creatinine level of more than 1.5 mg/dL. We performed multivariable analysis to evaluate whether ARF was an independent risk factor associated with inferior outcomes. RESULTS: Of a total of 1518 patients, 253 received kidneys from expanded-criteria donors (ECD; with ARF [n=116] and without ARF [n=137]) and 1265 from standard-criteria donors (SCD; with ARF [n=369] and without ARF [n=896]). The incidence of delayed graft function was higher in ECD (68.1% vs. 58.4%; P=0.072) and SCD (69.9% vs. 50.6%; P<0.001) recipients of kidneys with ARF compared with those without ARF, respectively. At 1 year, patient, graft, and rejection-free survivals were not statistically different in SCD or ECD recipients with or without ARF. Renal function at 1 year was similar in recipients of ECD (41.9±26.3 vs. 40.1±21.7 mL/min; P=0.565) or SCD (50.9±29.9 vs. 53.6±28.5 mL/min; P=0.131) kidneys with and without ARF, respectively. Compared with kidneys without ARF, receiving a kidney allograft with ARF was not associated with increased risk of death, graft lost, or inferior renal function 1 year after transplantation. CONCLUSION: In this cohort of patients, kidneys from deceased donors with ARF provided graft survival and renal function comparable with kidneys from donors without ARF 1 year after transplantation.
Authors: Glauco Adrieno Westphal; Valter Duro Garcia; Rafael Lisboa de Souza; Cristiano Augusto Franke; Kalinca Daberkow Vieira; Viviane Renata Zaclikevis Birckholz; Miriam Cristine Machado; Eliana Régia Barbosa de Almeida; Fernando Osni Machado; Luiz Antônio da Costa Sardinha; Raquel Wanzuita; Carlos Eduardo Soares Silvado; Gerson Costa; Vera Braatz; Milton Caldeira Filho; Rodrigo Furtado; Luana Alves Tannous; André Gustavo Neves de Albuquerque; Edson Abdala Journal: Rev Bras Ter Intensiva Date: 2016-09
Authors: Isaac E Hall; Enver Akalin; Jonathan S Bromberg; Mona D Doshi; Tom Greene; Meera N Harhay; Yaqi Jia; Sherry G Mansour; Sumit Mohan; Thangamani Muthukumar; Peter P Reese; Bernd Schröppel; Pooja Singh; Heather R Thiessen-Philbrook; Francis L Weng; Chirag R Parikh Journal: Kidney Int Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 10.612
Authors: I E Hall; B Schröppel; M D Doshi; J Ficek; F L Weng; R D Hasz; H Thiessen-Philbrook; P P Reese; C R Parikh Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2015-03-11 Impact factor: 8.086
Authors: Isaac E Hall; Peter P Reese; Francis L Weng; Bernd Schröppel; Mona D Doshi; Rick D Hasz; William Reitsma; Michael J Goldstein; Kwangik Hong; Chirag R Parikh Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2014-02-20 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Urs Benck; Peter Schnuelle; Bernd Krüger; Kai Nowak; Thomas Riester; Heiko Mundt; Niklas Lutz; Matthias Jung; Rainer Birck; Bernhard K Krämer; Wilhelm H Schmitt Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2015-10-26 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Ann Young; Stephanie N Dixon; Greg A Knoll; Amit X Garg; Charmaine E Lok; Ngan N Lam; S Joseph Kim Journal: Can J Kidney Health Dis Date: 2016-03-24
Authors: Jeong Ho Kim; Young Soo Kim; Min Seok Choi; Young Ok Kim; Sun Ae Yoon; Ji-Il Kim; In Sung Moon; Bum Soon Choi; Cheol Whee Park; Chul Woo Yang; Yong-Soo Kim; Byung Ha Chung Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2017-01-27 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Neel Koyawala; Peter P Reese; Isaac E Hall; Yaqi Jia; Heather R Thiessen-Philbrook; Sherry G Mansour; Mona D Doshi; Enver Akalin; Jonathan S Bromberg; Meera N Harhay; Sumit Mohan; Thangamani Muthukumar; Bernd Schröppel; Pooja Singh; Francis L Weng; Chirag R Parikh Journal: Transplantation Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 5.385