Literature DB >> 23274398

An anisotropic, hyperelastic model for skin: experimental measurements, finite element modelling and identification of parameters for human and murine skin.

Rachel B Groves1, Sion A Coulman, James C Birchall, Sam L Evans.   

Abstract

The mechanical characteristics of skin are extremely complex and have not been satisfactorily simulated by conventional engineering models. The ability to predict human skin behaviour and to evaluate changes in the mechanical properties of the tissue would inform engineering design and would prove valuable in a diversity of disciplines, for example the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries, which currently rely upon experiments performed in animal models. The aim of this study was to develop a predictive anisotropic, hyperelastic constitutive model of human skin and to validate this model using laboratory data. As a corollary, the mechanical characteristics of human and murine skin have been compared. A novel experimental design, using tensile tests on circular skin specimens, and an optimisation procedure were adopted for laboratory experiments to identify the material parameters of the tissue. Uniaxial tensile tests were performed along three load axes on excised murine and human skin samples, using a single set of material parameters for each skin sample. A finite element model was developed using the transversely isotropic, hyperelastic constitutive model of Weiss et al. (1996) and was embedded within a Veronda-Westmann isotropic material matrix, using three fibre families to create anisotropic behaviour. The model was able to represent the nonlinear, anisotropic behaviour of the skin well. Additionally, examination of the optimal material coefficients and the experimental data permitted quantification of the mechanical differences between human and murine skin. Differences between the skin types, most notably the extension of the skin at low load, have highlighted some of the limitations of murine skin as a biomechanical model of the human tissue. The development of accurate, predictive computational models of human tissue, such as skin, to reduce, refine or replace animal models and to inform developments in the medical, engineering and cosmetic fields, is a significant challenge but is highly desirable. Concurrent advances in computer technology and our understanding of human physiology must be utilised to produce more accurate and accessible predictive models, such as the finite element model described in this study.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23274398     DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2012.10.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater        ISSN: 1878-0180


  18 in total

1.  A surface wave elastography technique for measuring tissue viscoelastic properties.

Authors:  Xiaoming Zhang
Journal:  Med Eng Phys       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 2.242

Review 2.  Mathematical and computational modelling of skin biophysics: a review.

Authors:  Georges Limbert
Journal:  Proc Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 2.704

3.  Implementation and validation of constitutive relations for human dermis mechanical response.

Authors:  Alessandra Aldieri; Mara Terzini; Cristina Bignardi; Elisabetta M Zanetti; Alberto L Audenino
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2018-05-19       Impact factor: 2.602

4.  Mechanical response of human female breast skin under uniaxial stretching.

Authors:  N Kumaraswamy; Hamed Khatam; Gregory P Reece; Michelle C Fingeret; Mia K Markey; Krishnaswamy Ravi-Chandar
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-05-19

Review 5.  Biomechanics and mechanobiology in functional tissue engineering.

Authors:  Farshid Guilak; David L Butler; Steven A Goldstein; Frank P T Baaijens
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-04-26       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Propagation of uncertainty in the mechanical and biological response of growing tissues using multi-fidelity Gaussian process regression.

Authors:  Taeksang Lee; Ilias Bilionis; Adrian Buganza Tepole
Journal:  Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 6.756

7.  Characterization of human female breast and abdominal skin elasticity using a bulge test.

Authors:  Mazen Diab; Nishamathi Kumaraswamy; Gregory P Reece; Summer E Hanson; Michelle C Fingeret; Mia K Markey; Krishnaswamy Ravi-Chandar
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2019-12-26

Review 8.  Thermal injury of skin and subcutaneous tissues: A review of experimental approaches and numerical models.

Authors:  Hanglin Ye; Suvranu De
Journal:  Burns       Date:  2016-12-05       Impact factor: 2.744

9.  Ex vivo multiscale quantitation of skin biomechanics in wild-type and genetically-modified mice using multiphoton microscopy.

Authors:  Stéphane Bancelin; Barbara Lynch; Christelle Bonod-Bidaud; Guillaume Ducourthial; Sotiris Psilodimitrakopoulos; Petr Dokládal; Jean-Marc Allain; Marie-Claire Schanne-Klein; Florence Ruggiero
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-12-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  How aging impacts skin biomechanics: a multiscale study in mice.

Authors:  Barbara Lynch; Christelle Bonod-Bidaud; Guillaume Ducourthial; Jean-Sébastien Affagard; Stéphane Bancelin; Sotiris Psilodimitrakopoulos; Florence Ruggiero; Jean-Marc Allain; Marie-Claire Schanne-Klein
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.