BACKGROUND: Docetaxel is a taxane anticancer drug used in a wide variety of solid tumors. Liposomes are versatile drug carriers that may increase drug solubility, serve as sustained release systems, provide protection from drug degradation and toxicities, and help overcome multidrug resistance. This phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics (PK), and clinical response of liposomal-encapsulated docetaxel (LE-DT) in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies. METHODS: LE-DT was administered using a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation schema with dose levels of 50, 65, 85, 110, and 132 mg/m(2) IV on a 3-week cycle. Toxicities were assessed using the NCI-CTCAE version 3.0, and response was assessed using RECIST criteria (version 1.0). PK samples were drawn during cycle 1 and analyzed using a non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were treated for 1-30 cycles (median = 4). No DLTs were experienced through dose levels of 50, 65, 85, and 110 mg/m(2). Two out of two patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia at the 132 mg/m(2) dose level. When an additional three patients were treated at the expanded 110 mg/m(2) dose level, two experienced grade 4 neutropenia. The 85 mg/m(2) dose level was reassessed with an expanded group of three additional patients, and only one of three patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. The protocol was amended to allow G-CSF during cycle 1, and an additional three patients were treated at 110 mg/m(2) with no DLTs experienced. No patient experienced significant neuropathy, even patients treated for 19, 20, and 30 cycles. PK followed a two-compartment elimination pattern; there was no correlation between PK and toxicity. Two patients with thyroid and neuroendocrine cancer had partial responses (PR, 8%), and one patient with non-small-cell lung cancer had an unconfirmed PR. Eight patients (33%) had stable disease lasting more than 3 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 41%. CONCLUSION: LE-DT was well tolerated with expected toxicities of neutropenia, anemia, and fatigue, but without neuropathy or edema. Clinical benefit (SD + PR) was observed in 41% of the patients. The recommended phase II dose of LE-DT is 85 mg/m(2) without G-CSF or 110 mg/m(2) with G-CSF.
BACKGROUND:Docetaxel is a taxane anticancer drug used in a wide variety of solid tumors. Liposomes are versatile drug carriers that may increase drug solubility, serve as sustained release systems, provide protection from drug degradation and toxicities, and help overcome multidrug resistance. This phase I study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics (PK), and clinical response of liposomal-encapsulated docetaxel (LE-DT) in patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies. METHODS:LE-DT was administered using a standard 3 + 3 dose escalation schema with dose levels of 50, 65, 85, 110, and 132 mg/m(2) IV on a 3-week cycle. Toxicities were assessed using the NCI-CTCAE version 3.0, and response was assessed using RECIST criteria (version 1.0). PK samples were drawn during cycle 1 and analyzed using a non-compartmental analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were treated for 1-30 cycles (median = 4). No DLTs were experienced through dose levels of 50, 65, 85, and 110 mg/m(2). Two out of two patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia at the 132 mg/m(2) dose level. When an additional three patients were treated at the expanded 110 mg/m(2) dose level, two experienced grade 4 neutropenia. The 85 mg/m(2) dose level was reassessed with an expanded group of three additional patients, and only one of three patients experienced grade 4 neutropenia. The protocol was amended to allow G-CSF during cycle 1, and an additional three patients were treated at 110 mg/m(2) with no DLTs experienced. No patient experienced significant neuropathy, even patients treated for 19, 20, and 30 cycles. PK followed a two-compartment elimination pattern; there was no correlation between PK and toxicity. Two patients with thyroid and neuroendocrine cancer had partial responses (PR, 8%), and one patient with non-small-cell lung cancer had an unconfirmed PR. Eight patients (33%) had stable disease lasting more than 3 months, for a clinical benefit rate of 41%. CONCLUSION:LE-DT was well tolerated with expected toxicities of neutropenia, anemia, and fatigue, but without neuropathy or edema. Clinical benefit (SD + PR) was observed in 41% of the patients. The recommended phase II dose of LE-DT is 85 mg/m(2) without G-CSF or 110 mg/m(2) with G-CSF.
Authors: Frank Fossella; Jose R Pereira; Joachim von Pawel; Anna Pluzanska; Vera Gorbounova; Eckhard Kaukel; Karin V Mattson; Rodryg Ramlau; Aleksandra Szczesna; Panagiotis Fidias; Michael Millward; Chandra P Belani Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-07-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Ian F Tannock; Ronald de Wit; William R Berry; Jozsef Horti; Anna Pluzanska; Kim N Chi; Stephane Oudard; Christine Théodore; Nicholas D James; Ingela Turesson; Mark A Rosenthal; Mario A Eisenberger Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-10-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jean-Marc Nabholtz; Carla Falkson; Daniel Campos; Janos Szanto; Miguel Martin; Stephen Chan; Tadeuz Pienkowski; Jerzy Zaluski; Tamas Pinter; Maciej Krzakowski; Daniel Vorobiof; Robert Leonard; Ian Kennedy; Nacer Azli; Michael Murawsky; Alessandro Riva; Pierre Pouillart Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-03-15 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: A Rahman; S R Husain; J Siddiqui; M Verma; M Agresti; M Center; A R Safa; R I Glazer Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1992-12-16 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Peter Hau; Klaus Fabel; Ulrike Baumgart; Petra Rümmele; Oliver Grauer; Annekatrin Bock; Christopher Dietmaier; Wolfgang Dietmaier; Jörg Dietrich; Christine Dudel; Franz Hübner; Tanya Jauch; Elisabeth Drechsel; Ingo Kleiter; Cäcile Wismeth; Anton Zellner; Alexander Brawanski; Andreas Steinbrecher; Jörg Marienhagen; Ulrich Bogdahn Journal: Cancer Date: 2004-03-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Joy Hsu; Jonathan J Hodgins; Malvika Marathe; Chris J Nicolai; Marie-Claude Bourgeois-Daigneault; Troy N Trevino; Camillia S Azimi; Amit K Scheer; Haley E Randolph; Thornton W Thompson; Lily Zhang; Alexandre Iannello; Nikhita Mathur; Karen E Jardine; Georgia A Kirn; John C Bell; Michael W McBurney; David H Raulet; Michele Ardolino Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Aditya Ganju; Murali M Yallapu; Sheema Khan; Stephen W Behrman; Subhash C Chauhan; Meena Jaggi Journal: Drug Resist Updat Date: 2014-04-05 Impact factor: 18.500
Authors: Bruno A Cisterna; Nazila Kamaly; Won Il Choi; Ali Tavakkoli; Omid C Farokhzad; Cristian Vilos Journal: Nanomedicine (Lond) Date: 2016-08-16 Impact factor: 5.307