Literature DB >> 23273073

Does mechanical bowel preparation improve quality of laparoscopic nephrectomy? Propensity score-matched analysis in Japanese series.

Toru Sugihara1, Hideo Yasunaga, Hiromasa Horiguchi, Tetsuya Fujimura, Hiroaki Nishimatsu, Kazuhiko Ohe, Shinya Matsuda, Kiyohide Fushimi, Michael W Kattan, Yukio Homma.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of mechanical bowel preparation (MBP) before laparoscopic nephrectomy in terms of operation time and perioperative complications.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1-T3 tumors were identified in the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database from 2008 to 2010. The patients were stratified into a preoperative MBP group (polyethylene glycol electrolyte, magnesium citrate solution, and sodium picosulfate) and a non-MBP group and were matched using one-to-one propensity score matching according to age, sex, Charlson score, T category, hospital volume, and hospital academic status. The operation time, postoperative length of stay, and overall complication rate were assessed by multivariate regression analyses.
RESULTS: Of 2740 patients in 355 hospitals, 1110 pairs were generated. The median operation time, postoperative stay, and overall complication rate (MBP vs non-MBP group) was 278 and 268 minutes (P<.004), 10.3 and 10.0 days (P=.695), and 11.8% and 11.4% (P=.740), respectively. The multivariate regression analyses did not find significant superiority of MBP for the 3 endpoints (all P>.05). A shorter operation time was significantly associated with female sex and early-stage tumor. Older age, greater Charlson score, and lower hospital volume adversely affected the postoperative stay and overall complication rate. Stage T3 tumor was unfavorable for the postoperative stay.
CONCLUSION: Our large-scale propensity score-matched analysis did not demonstrate a benefit for MBP in operation time, postoperative stay, or overall complications. The results suggest that MBP can be safely omitted before laparoscopic nephrectomy for T1-T3 tumors.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23273073     DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.09.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  3 in total

1.  Factors affecting choice between ureterostomy, ileal conduit and continent reservoir after radical cystectomy: Japanese series.

Authors:  Toru Sugihara; Hideo Yasunaga; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Tetsuya Fujimura; Kiyohide Fushimi; Changhong Yu; Michael W Kattan; Yukio Homma
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-01-07       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Pancreatic Stent or Rectal Indomethacin-Which Better Prevents Post-ERCP Pancreatitis?: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

Authors:  Guo-Dong Li; Xin-Yong Jia; Hai-Yan Dong; Qiu-Ping Pang; Hai-Lan Zhai; Xiu-Juan Zhang; Rong Guo; Yan-Chun Dong; Cheng-Yong Qin
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.889

3.  Does Mechanical Bowel Preparation Ameliorate Surgical Performance in Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion?

Authors:  Chang-Hoon Jeon; Han-Dong Lee; Nam-Su Chung
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2019-01-23
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.