Literature DB >> 23272324

Genomewide markers as cofactors for precision mapping of quantitative trait loci.

R Bernardo1.   

Abstract

In composite interval mapping of quantitative trait loci (QTL), subsets of background markers are used to account for the effects of QTL outside the marker interval being tested. Here, I propose a QTL mapping approach (called G model) that utilizes genomewide markers as cofactors. The G model involves backward elimination on a given chromosome after correcting for genomewide marker effects, calculated under a random effects model, at all the other chromosomes. I simulated a trait controlled by 15 or 30 QTL, mapping populations of N = 96, 192, and 384 recombinant inbreds, and N M = 192 and 384 evenly spaced markers. In the C model, which utilized subsets of background markers, the number of QTL detected and the number of false positives depended on the number of cofactors used, with five cofactors being too few with N = 384 and 20-40 cofactors being too many with N = 96. A window size of 0 cM for excluding cofactors maintained the number of true QTL detected while decreasing the number of false positives. The number of true QTL detected was generally higher with the G model than with the C model, and the G model led to good control of the type I error rate in simulations where the null hypothesis of no marker-QTL linkage was true. Overall, the results indicated that the G model is useful in QTL mapping because it is less subjective and has equal, if not better, performance when compared with the traditional approach of using subsets of markers to account for background QTL.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23272324     DOI: 10.1007/s00122-012-2032-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Theor Appl Genet        ISSN: 0040-5752            Impact factor:   5.699


  20 in total

1.  Evaluation of genome-wide selection efficiency in maize nested association mapping populations.

Authors:  Zhigang Guo; Dominic M Tucker; Jianwei Lu; Venkata Kishore; Gilles Gay
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 5.699

2.  R/qtl: QTL mapping in experimental crosses.

Authors:  Karl W Broman; Hao Wu; Saunak Sen; Gary A Churchill
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Inferences regarding the numbers and locations of QTLs under multiple-QTL models using interval mapping and composite interval mapping.

Authors:  Theodore W Cornforth; Anthony D Long
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.588

4.  A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers.

Authors:  C S Haley; S A Knott
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  High-throughput genotyping with the GoldenGate assay in the complex genome of soybean.

Authors:  David L Hyten; Qijian Song; Ik-Young Choi; Mun-Sup Yoon; James E Specht; Lakshmi K Matukumalli; Randall L Nelson; Randy C Shoemaker; Nevin D Young; Perry B Cregan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  A general mixture model for mapping quantitative trait loci by using molecular markers.

Authors:  R C Jansen
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  Mapping mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps.

Authors:  E S Lander; D Botstein
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 4.562

8.  Theoretical basis for separation of multiple linked gene effects in mapping quantitative trait loci.

Authors:  Z B Zeng
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-12-01       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  High resolution of quantitative traits into multiple loci via interval mapping.

Authors:  R C Jansen; P Stam
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Resistance to barley scald (Rhynchosporium secalis) in the Ethiopian donor lines 'Steudelli' and 'Jet', analyzed by partial least squares regression and interval mapping.

Authors:  A Bjørnstad; S Grønnerød; J Mac Key; A Tekauz; J Crossa; H Martens
Journal:  Hereditas       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.271

View more
  16 in total

1.  Evaluation of multi-locus models for genome-wide association studies: a case study in sugar beet.

Authors:  T Würschum; T Kraft
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.821

2.  Fine mapping by composite genome-wide association analysis.

Authors:  Joaquim Casellas; Jhon Jacobo Cañas-Álvarez; Marta Fina; Jesús Piedrafita; Alessio Cecchinato
Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)       Date:  2017-06-06       Impact factor: 1.588

3.  Mapping small-effect and linked quantitative trait loci for complex traits in backcross or DH populations via a multi-locus GWAS methodology.

Authors:  Shi-Bo Wang; Yang-Jun Wen; Wen-Long Ren; Yuan-Li Ni; Jin Zhang; Jian-Ying Feng; Yuan-Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-20       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Seed Quality Traits Can Be Predicted with High Accuracy in Brassica napus Using Genomic Data.

Authors:  Jun Zou; Yusheng Zhao; Peifa Liu; Lei Shi; Xiaohua Wang; Meng Wang; Jinling Meng; Jochen Christoph Reif
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-23       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Mapping of quantitative trait loci for grain yield and its components in a US popular winter wheat TAM 111 using 90K SNPs.

Authors:  Silvano O Assanga; Maria Fuentealba; Guorong Zhang; ChorTee Tan; Smit Dhakal; Jackie C Rudd; Amir M H Ibrahim; Qingwu Xue; Scott Haley; Jianli Chen; Shiaoman Chao; Jason Baker; Kirk Jessup; Shuyu Liu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Identification of Nitrogen Consumption Genetic Variants in Yeast Through QTL Mapping and Bulk Segregant RNA-Seq Analyses.

Authors:  Francisco A Cubillos; Claire Brice; Jennifer Molinet; Sebastién Tisné; Valentina Abarca; Sebastián M Tapia; Christian Oporto; Verónica García; Gianni Liti; Claudio Martínez
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Fine-mapping and cross-validation of QTLs linked to fatty acid composition in multiple independent interspecific crosses of oil palm.

Authors:  Ngoot-Chin Ting; Zulkifli Yaakub; Katialisa Kamaruddin; Sean Mayes; Festo Massawe; Ravigadevi Sambanthamurthi; Johannes Jansen; Leslie Eng Ti Low; Maizura Ithnin; Ahmad Kushairi; Xaviar Arulandoo; Rozana Rosli; Kuang-Lim Chan; Nadzirah Amiruddin; Kandha Sritharan; Chin Ching Lim; Rajanaidu Nookiah; Mohd Din Amiruddin; Rajinder Singh
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Potential of marker selection to increase prediction accuracy of genomic selection in soybean (Glycine max L.).

Authors:  Yansong Ma; Jochen C Reif; Yong Jiang; Zixiang Wen; Dechun Wang; Zhangxiong Liu; Yong Guo; Shuhong Wei; Shuming Wang; Chunming Yang; Huicai Wang; Chunyan Yang; Weiguo Lu; Ran Xu; Rong Zhou; Ruizhen Wang; Zudong Sun; Huaizhu Chen; Wanhai Zhang; Jian Wu; Guohua Hu; Chunyan Liu; Xiaoyan Luan; Yashu Fu; Tai Guo; Tianfu Han; Mengchen Zhang; Bincheng Sun; Lei Zhang; Weiyuan Chen; Cunxiang Wu; Shi Sun; Baojun Yuan; Xinan Zhou; Dezhi Han; Hongrui Yan; Wenbin Li; Lijuan Qiu
Journal:  Mol Breed       Date:  2016-07-28       Impact factor: 2.589

9.  Genome-wide association mapping of quantitative traits in a breeding population of sugarcane.

Authors:  Josefina Racedo; Lucía Gutiérrez; María Francisca Perera; Santiago Ostengo; Esteban Mariano Pardo; María Inés Cuenya; Bjorn Welin; Atilio Pedro Castagnaro
Journal:  BMC Plant Biol       Date:  2016-06-24       Impact factor: 4.215

10.  Dissecting combining ability effect in a rice NCII-III population provides insights into heterosis in indica-japonica cross.

Authors:  Hao Zhou; Duo Xia; Jing Zeng; Gonghao Jiang; Yuqing He
Journal:  Rice (N Y)       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 4.783

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.