BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Folate has been strongly implicated in the aetiology of colorectal cancer. However, the relationship between dietary folate intake, rectal mucosal folate status and colorectal cancer risk is uncertain. The study aimed to estimate nutrient intakes and measure systemic folate status and rectal mucosal folate concentration in people at differential risk of developing colorectal cancer. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-eight individuals were recruited from gastroenterology clinics and subdivided into three patient groups: untreated colorectal cancer (n = 43), adenomatous polyps (n = 90) or normal bowel (n = 95). Biopsies from macroscopically normal rectal mucosa and blood were collected and used for the measurement of rectal mucosal 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MeTHF) and systemic markers of folate status, respectively. Nutrient intake was estimated using a validated food frequency questionnaire. RESULTS: Dietary intake variables, plasma 5-MeTHF and red cell folate and plasma homocysteine concentrations were similar in all three subject groups and 95% CI fell within normal range for each variable. Rectal mucosal 5-MeTHF concentration was higher in the normal mucosa of adenomatous polyp patients than in normal subjects (P = 0.055). Rectal mucosal 5-MeTHF was associated significantly with plasma folate (P < 0.001, r = 0.294), red cell folate (P = 0.014, r = 0.305), plasma homocysteine (P = 0.017, r = -0.163) and dietary folate intake (P = 0.036, r = 0.152). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates adequate folate status of patients attending gastroenterology clinics for the investigation of bowel symptoms, with no significant difference in dietary intakes or systemic folate status indices according to diagnosis. Rectal mucosal 5-MeTHF concentrations were elevated in adenomatous polyp patients, but failed to reach significance. Further studies are required to determine the biological significance of this observation.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVES: Folate has been strongly implicated in the aetiology of colorectal cancer. However, the relationship between dietary folate intake, rectal mucosal folate status and colorectal cancer risk is uncertain. The study aimed to estimate nutrient intakes and measure systemic folate status and rectal mucosal folate concentration in people at differential risk of developing colorectal cancer. METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-eight individuals were recruited from gastroenterology clinics and subdivided into three patient groups: untreated colorectal cancer (n = 43), adenomatous polyps (n = 90) or normal bowel (n = 95). Biopsies from macroscopically normal rectal mucosa and blood were collected and used for the measurement of rectal mucosal 5-methyltetrahydrofolate (5-MeTHF) and systemic markers of folate status, respectively. Nutrient intake was estimated using a validated food frequency questionnaire. RESULTS: Dietary intake variables, plasma 5-MeTHF and red cell folate and plasma homocysteine concentrations were similar in all three subject groups and 95% CI fell within normal range for each variable. Rectal mucosal 5-MeTHF concentration was higher in the normal mucosa of adenomatous polyp patients than in normal subjects (P = 0.055). Rectal mucosal 5-MeTHF was associated significantly with plasma folate (P < 0.001, r = 0.294), red cell folate (P = 0.014, r = 0.305), plasma homocysteine (P = 0.017, r = -0.163) and dietary folate intake (P = 0.036, r = 0.152). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates adequate folate status of patients attending gastroenterology clinics for the investigation of bowel symptoms, with no significant difference in dietary intakes or systemic folate status indices according to diagnosis. Rectal mucosal 5-MeTHF concentrations were elevated in adenomatous polyp patients, but failed to reach significance. Further studies are required to determine the biological significance of this observation.
Authors: Lisa Harnack; David R Jacobs; Kristin Nicodemus; DeAnn Lazovich; Kristin Anderson; Aaron R Folsom Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2002 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Erik J M Konings; R Alexandra Goldbohm; Henny A M Brants; Wim H M Saris; Piet A van den Brandt Journal: Cancer Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Maria Pufulete; Reyad Al-Ghnaniem; Andrew J M Leather; Paul Appleby; Sally Gout; Catherine Terry; Peter W Emery; Thomas A B Sanders Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Xiang Jun Shen; John F Rawls; Thomas Randall; Lauren Burcal; Caroline N Mpande; Natascha Jenkins; Biljana Jovov; Zaid Abdo; Robert S Sandler; Temitope O Keku Journal: Gut Microbes Date: 2010-05-13
Authors: Robert Clarke; J Grimley Evans; J Schneede; E Nexo; C Bates; A Fletcher; A Prentice; C Johnston; P M Ueland; H Refsum; P Sherliker; J Birks; G Whitlock; E Breeze; J M Scott Journal: Age Ageing Date: 2004-01 Impact factor: 10.668