Literature DB >> 23271209

FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer: single institution retrospective review of efficacy and toxicity.

Krishna S Gunturu1, Xiaopan Yao, Xiangyu Cong, Jaykumar R Thumar, Howard S Hochster, Stacey M Stein, Jill Lacy.   

Abstract

Although FOLFIRINOX significantly increases survival in metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) compared to gemcitabine (Conroy et al. N Engl J Med 364:1817-1825, 2011), toxicities have tempered enthusiasm for its use in full doses. To assess the impact of dose attenuations on toxicity and efficacy, we reviewed our institution's experience with FOLFIRINOX in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) and MPC. We performed a retrospective review of dose, toxicity, and efficacy of FOLFIRINOX in all patients with LAPC and MPC treated between June 2010 and July 2011 at Yale. Toxicities in all patients and response rate (RR) and survival in previously untreated MPC were compared to data reported by Conroy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival were estimated by Kaplan-Meier method. Thirty-five patients were treated (16 LAPC; 19 MPC). Twenty-nine patients received dose attenuations with the first cycle. Median relative doses of irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil were less than those reported by Conroy (64 vs. 81 % and 66 vs. 82 %, respectively). RR was 50 % in LAPC and 47 % in MPC, and the latter did not differ significantly from the RR reported by Conroy (p = 0.19). OS at 6 and 12 months in MPC was comparable to OS reported by Conroy. Grade 3/4 toxicities were less than reported by Conroy, including fatigue (p = 0.009) and neutropenia (p < 0.0001). Nine patients experienced transient dysarthria during irinotecan administration. Our findings validate the efficacy and tolerability of FOLFIRINOX in LAPC and MPC and suggest that dose attenuations of irinotecan and bolus fluorouracil improve tolerability without compromising efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23271209     DOI: 10.1007/s12032-012-0361-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Oncol        ISSN: 1357-0560            Impact factor:   3.064


  26 in total

1.  Meta-analyses of chemotherapy for locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Asma Sultana; Catrin Tudur Smith; David Cunningham; Naureen Starling; John P Neoptolemos; Paula Ghaneh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine for metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Thierry Conroy; Françoise Desseigne; Marc Ychou; Olivier Bouché; Rosine Guimbaud; Yves Bécouarn; Antoine Adenis; Jean-Luc Raoul; Sophie Gourgou-Bourgade; Christelle de la Fouchardière; Jaafar Bennouna; Jean-Baptiste Bachet; Faiza Khemissa-Akouz; Denis Péré-Vergé; Catherine Delbaldo; Eric Assenat; Bruno Chauffert; Pierre Michel; Christine Montoto-Grillot; Michel Ducreux
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-05-12       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  The crystal structure of the complex of the anticancer prodrug 7-ethyl-10-[4-(1-piperidino)-1-piperidino]-carbonyloxycamptothecin (CPT-11) with Torpedo californica acetylcholinesterase provides a molecular explanation for its cholinergic action.

Authors:  Michal Harel; Janice L Hyatt; Boris Brumshtein; Christopher L Morton; Kyoung Jin P Yoon; Randy M Wadkins; Israel Silman; Joel L Sussman; Philip M Potter
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2005-03-16       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Cancer statistics, 2010.

Authors:  Ahmedin Jemal; Rebecca Siegel; Jiaquan Xu; Elizabeth Ward
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2010-07-07       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine plus cisplatin compared with gemcitabine alone in advanced pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Volker Heinemann; Detlef Quietzsch; Frank Gieseler; Michael Gonnermann; Herbert Schönekäs; Andreas Rost; Horst Neuhaus; Caroline Haag; Michael Clemens; Bernard Heinrich; Ursula Vehling-Kaiser; Martin Fuchs; Doris Fleckenstein; Wolfgang Gesierich; Dirk Uthgenannt; Hermann Einsele; Axel Holstege; Axel Hinke; Andreas Schalhorn; Ralf Wilkowski
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Phase III study comparing gemcitabine plus cetuximab versus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Southwest Oncology Group-directed intergroup trial S0205.

Authors:  Philip A Philip; Jacqueline Benedetti; Christopher L Corless; Ralph Wong; Eileen M O'Reilly; Patrick J Flynn; Kendrith M Rowland; James N Atkins; Barry C Mirtsching; Saul E Rivkin; Alok A Khorana; Bryan Goldman; Cecilia M Fenoglio-Preiser; James L Abbruzzese; Charles D Blanke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297.

Authors:  Jordan D Berlin; Paul Catalano; James P Thomas; John W Kugler; Daniel G Haller; Al Bowen Benson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-08-01       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Quantitative light microscopic autoradiographic localization of cholinergic muscarinic receptors in the human brain: brainstem.

Authors:  R Cortes; A Probst; J M Palacios
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 3.590

9.  Irinotecan plus gemcitabine results in no survival advantage compared with gemcitabine monotherapy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer despite increased tumor response rate.

Authors:  Caio M Rocha Lima; Mark R Green; Robert Rotche; Wilson H Miller; G Mark Jeffrey; Laura A Cisar; Adele Morganti; Nicoletta Orlando; Gabriela Gruia; Langdon L Miller
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-09-15       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Irinotecan-induced dysarthria.

Authors:  Albertine J Dressel; Johannes C van der Mijn; Ijke J Aalders; Rico N P M Rinkel; Hans J van der Vliet
Journal:  Case Rep Oncol       Date:  2012-01-18
View more
  53 in total

1.  FOLFIRINOX-induced reversible dysarthria: A case report and review of previous cases.

Authors:  Ayumu Matsuoka; Osamu Maeda; Megumi Inada-Inoue; Eizaburo Ohno; Yoshiki Hirooka; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsutomu Fujii; Masato Nagino; Hidemi Goto; Yuichi Ando
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.967

Review 2.  FOLFIRINOX for locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and patient-level meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mustafa Suker; Berend R Beumer; Eran Sadot; Lysiane Marthey; Jason E Faris; Eric A Mellon; Bassel F El-Rayes; Andrea Wang-Gillam; Jill Lacy; Peter J Hosein; Sing Yu Moorcraft; Thierry Conroy; Florian Hohla; Peter Allen; Julien Taieb; Theodore S Hong; Ravi Shridhar; Ian Chau; Casper H van Eijck; Bas Groot Koerkamp
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2016-05-06       Impact factor: 41.316

3.  Comparison of efficacy and toxicity of FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel in unresectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Tetsuhito Muranaka; Masaki Kuwatani; Yoshito Komatsu; Kentaro Sawada; Hiroshi Nakatsumi; Yasuyuki Kawamoto; Satoshi Yuki; Yoshimasa Kubota; Kimitoshi Kubo; Shuhei Kawahata; Kazumichi Kawakubo; Hiroshi Kawakami; Naoya Sakamoto
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2017-06

4.  Response to nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in a patient with primary resistance to FOLFIRINOX.

Authors:  Zachary Reese; Shiven Patel; David D Stenehjem; Ignacio Garrido-Laguna
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2014-12

Review 5.  Individualized radiotherapy (iRT) concepts for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC): indications and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Stephanie E Combs
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Meta-analysis of FOLFIRINOX regimen as the first-line chemotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Xifeng Xu; Qiong Wu; Zhen Wang; Song Zheng; Ke Ge; Changku Jia
Journal:  Clin Exp Med       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.984

7.  Efficacy and Safety of FOLFIRINOX in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer. A Single Center Experience.

Authors:  G Lakatos; A Petranyi; A Szűcs; L Nehéz; L Harsanyi; P Hegyi; G Bodoky
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 3.201

Review 8.  Pancreatic cancer: from state-of-the-art treatments to promising novel therapies.

Authors:  Ignacio Garrido-Laguna; Manuel Hidalgo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-03-31       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Clinical trials: New drug for pancreatic cancer highlights the dual effect of regulatory approvals.

Authors:  Susan E Bates; Tito Fojo
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 66.675

10.  URG11 predicts poor prognosis of pancreatic cancer by enhancing epithelial-mesenchymal transition-driven invasion.

Authors:  Wei Peng; Jun Zhang; Jie Liu
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 3.064

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.