Literature DB >> 23271144

Assaying DNA damage in hippocampal neurons using the comet assay.

Somaira Nowsheen1, Fen Xia, Eddy S Yang.   

Abstract

A number of drugs target the DNA repair pathways and induce cell kill by creating DNA damage. Thus, processes to directly measure DNA damage have been extensively evaluated. Traditional methods are time consuming, expensive, resource intensive and require replicating cells. In contrast, the comet assay, a single cell gel electrophoresis assay, is a faster, non-invasive, inexpensive, direct and sensitive measure of DNA damage and repair. All forms of DNA damage as well as DNA repair can be visualized at the single cell level using this powerful technique. The principle underlying the comet assay is that intact DNA is highly ordered whereas DNA damage disrupts this organization. The damaged DNA seeps into the agarose matrix and when subjected to an electric field, the negatively charged DNA migrates towards the cathode which is positively charged. The large undamaged DNA strands are not able to migrate far from the nucleus. DNA damage creates smaller DNA fragments which travel farther than the intact DNA. Comet Assay, an image analysis software, measures and compares the overall fluorescent intensity of the DNA in the nucleus with DNA that has migrated out of the nucleus. Fluorescent signal from the migrated DNA is proportional to DNA damage. Longer brighter DNA tail signifies increased DNA damage. Some of the parameters that are measured are tail moment which is a measure of both the amount of DNA and distribution of DNA in the tail, tail length and percentage of DNA in the tail. This assay allows to measure DNA repair as well since resolution of DNA damage signifies repair has taken place. The limit of sensitivity is approximately 50 strand breaks per diploid mammalian cell (1,2). Cells treated with any DNA damaging agents, such as etoposide, may be used as a positive control. Thus the comet assay is a quick and effective procedure to measure DNA damage.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23271144      PMCID: PMC3576424          DOI: 10.3791/50049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Exp        ISSN: 1940-087X            Impact factor:   1.355


  20 in total

1.  Cloning and characterization of hOGG1, a human homolog of the OGG1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  J P Radicella; C Dherin; C Desmaze; M S Fox; S Boiteux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Heterogeneity in DNA damage using the comet assay.

Authors:  Peggy L Olive; Ralph E Durand
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 4.355

3.  Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Authors:  M Finney
Journal:  Curr Protoc Mol Biol       Date:  2001-05

4.  The poly(ADP-Ribose) polymerase inhibitor ABT-888 reduces radiation-induced nuclear EGFR and augments head and neck tumor response to radiotherapy.

Authors:  Somaira Nowsheen; James A Bonner; Eddy S Yang
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 6.280

5.  hOGG1 recognizes oxidative damage using the comet assay with greater specificity than FPG or ENDOIII.

Authors:  Catherine C Smith; Michael R O'Donovan; Elizabeth A Martin
Journal:  Mutagenesis       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 3.000

6.  Fluorescence in situ hybridization in combination with the comet assay and micronucleus test in genetic toxicology.

Authors:  Galina G Hovhannisyan
Journal:  Mol Cytogenet       Date:  2010-09-15       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Radiation sensitivity, H2AX phosphorylation, and kinetics of repair of DNA strand breaks in irradiated cervical cancer cell lines.

Authors:  Judit P Banáth; Susan H Macphail; Peggy L Olive
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2004-10-01       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 8.  GammaH2AX and cancer.

Authors:  William M Bonner; Christophe E Redon; Jennifer S Dickey; Asako J Nakamura; Olga A Sedelnikova; Stéphanie Solier; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  Residual gammaH2AX foci as an indication of lethal DNA lesions.

Authors:  Judit P Banáth; Dmitry Klokov; Susan H MacPhail; C Adriana Banuelos; Peggy L Olive
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-01-05       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 10.  The comet assay for DNA damage and repair: principles, applications, and limitations.

Authors:  Andrew R Collins
Journal:  Mol Biotechnol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  8 in total

1.  Inhibition of polarity-regulating kinase PAR1b contributes to Helicobacter pylori inflicted DNA Double Strand Breaks in gastric cells.

Authors:  Andrea Zamperone; David Cohen; Markus Stein; Charlotte Viard; Anne Müsch
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-01-13       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  The Adenovirus E4orf4 Protein Provides a Novel Mechanism for Inhibition of the DNA Damage Response.

Authors:  Anna Brestovitsky; Keren Nebenzahl-Sharon; Peter Kechker; Rakefet Sharf; Tamar Kleinberger
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 6.823

3.  Cellular defects caused by hypomorphic variants of the Bloom syndrome helicase gene BLM.

Authors:  Vivek M Shastri; Kristina H Schmidt
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomic Med       Date:  2015-11-26       Impact factor: 2.183

4.  Cryopreservation of Roughscale Sole (Clidoderma asperrimum) Sperm: Effects of Cryoprotectant, Diluent, Dilution Ratio, and Thawing Temperature.

Authors:  Irfan Zidni; Hyo-Bin Lee; Ji-Hye Yoon; Jung-Yeol Park; Hyun-Seok Jang; Youn-Su Cho; Young-Seok Seo; Han-Kyu Lim
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-24       Impact factor: 3.231

5.  Butylcycloheptylprodigiosin and undecylprodigiosin are potential photosensitizer candidates for photodynamic cancer therapy.

Authors:  Zahra Arshadi; Sayedeh Azimeh Hosseini; Daryoush Fatehi; Seyed Abbas Mirzaei; Fatemeh Elahian
Journal:  Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2021-07-30       Impact factor: 2.316

6.  P53 and taurine upregulated gene 1 promotes the repair of the DeoxyriboNucleic Acid damage induced by bupivacaine in murine primary sensory neurons.

Authors:  Luying Lai; Yongwei Wang; Shenghui Peng; Wenjing Guo; Fengxian Li; Shiyuan Xu
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 6.832

7.  DNA double strand break repair defect and sensitivity to poly ADP-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibition in human papillomavirus 16-positive head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Alice N Weaver; Tiffiny S Cooper; Marcela Rodriguez; Hoa Q Trummell; James A Bonner; Eben L Rosenthal; Eddy S Yang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2015-09-29

8.  The Fra-1-miR-134-SDS22 feedback loop amplifies ERK/JNK signaling and reduces chemosensitivity in ovarian cancer cells.

Authors:  Jianmin Wu; Yimin Sun; Pei-Ying Zhang; Mengyao Qian; Hengchao Zhang; Xiao Chen; Di Ma; Yunsheng Xu; Xiaoming Chen; Kai-Fu Tang
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2016-09-29       Impact factor: 8.469

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.