Literature DB >> 23268340

Can ENCODE tell us how much junk DNA we carry in our genome?

Deng-Ke Niu1, Li Jiang.   

Abstract

One of the large, unsolved problems in human genetics is the proportion of functional sequences in genomes. Recently, the encyclopedia of DNA elements consortium revealed that the majority of the genome is biochemically active, which were described as biochemical functions. This has been used as evidence to pronounce the death of the junk DNA concept. In evolutionary biology, junk DNAs are sequences whose gain or loss does not seriously affect fitness of the host organism. In the human genome, a large amount of biochemical activity should be to repress the sequences so as to avoid their harmful expression. The biochemical activity is very different from functionality in the light of evolution. The single nucleotide polymorphism sites associated with disease and other phenotypes may be functional, but their abundance in the active genome regions is not reliable evidence of functionality. Because of sequence-independent functions, the proportion of functional regions would be underestimated when sequence constraints are used alone. Knockout may be the most effective means of distinguishing functional sequences from junk DNA.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23268340     DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.074

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun        ISSN: 0006-291X            Impact factor:   3.575


  37 in total

Review 1.  Beyond the ENCODE project: using genomics and epigenomics strategies to study enhancer evolution.

Authors:  Noboru Jo Sakabe; Marcelo A Nobrega
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Useful parasites: the evolutionary biology and biotechnology applications of transposable elements.

Authors:  Georgi N Bonchev
Journal:  J Genet       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.166

3.  Is junk DNA bunk? A critique of ENCODE.

Authors:  W Ford Doolittle
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-03-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  CTRL+INSERT: retrotransposons and their contribution to regulation and innovation of the transcriptome.

Authors:  Jonathan Göke; Huck Hui Ng
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 8.807

5.  Genome-wide evolutionary characterization and expression analyses of major latex protein (MLP) family genes in Vitis vinifera.

Authors:  Ningbo Zhang; Ruimin Li; Wei Shen; Shuzhen Jiao; Junxiang Zhang; Weirong Xu
Journal:  Mol Genet Genomics       Date:  2018-04-27       Impact factor: 3.291

Review 6.  The persistent contributions of RNA to eukaryotic gen(om)e architecture and cellular function.

Authors:  Jürgen Brosius
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 10.005

7.  On the immortality of television sets: "function" in the human genome according to the evolution-free gospel of ENCODE.

Authors:  Dan Graur; Yichen Zheng; Nicholas Price; Ricardo B R Azevedo; Rebecca A Zufall; Eran Elhaik
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 8.  Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome.

Authors:  Manolis Kellis; Barbara Wold; Michael P Snyder; Bradley E Bernstein; Anshul Kundaje; Georgi K Marinov; Lucas D Ward; Ewan Birney; Gregory E Crawford; Job Dekker; Ian Dunham; Laura L Elnitski; Peggy J Farnham; Elise A Feingold; Mark Gerstein; Morgan C Giddings; David M Gilbert; Thomas R Gingeras; Eric D Green; Roderic Guigo; Tim Hubbard; Jim Kent; Jason D Lieb; Richard M Myers; Michael J Pazin; Bing Ren; John A Stamatoyannopoulos; Zhiping Weng; Kevin P White; Ross C Hardison
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 12.779

9.  Non-coding RNA: what is functional and what is junk?

Authors:  Alexander F Palazzo; Eliza S Lee
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 10.  Exaptation of transposable elements into novel cis-regulatory elements: is the evidence always strong?

Authors:  Flávio S J de Souza; Lucía F Franchini; Marcelo Rubinstein
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.