Literature DB >> 23267521

Perception of radiation exposure and risk among patients, medical students, and referring physicians at a tertiary care community hospital.

Michelle L Ricketts1, Mark O Baerlocher, Murray R Asch, Andy Myers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is important for physicians to be aware of the radiation doses as well as the risks associated with diagnostic imaging procedures that they are ordering.
METHODS: A survey was administered to patients, medical students, and referring physicians from a number of specialties to determine background knowledge regarding radiation exposure and risk associated with commonly ordered medical imaging tests.
RESULTS: A total of 127 patients, 32 referring physicians, and 30 medical students completed the survey. The majority of patients (92%) were not informed of the radiation risks associated with tests that they were scheduled to receive and had false perceptions about the use of radiation and its associated risks. Physicians and medical students had misconceptions about the use of ionizing radiation in a number of radiologic examinations; for example, 25% and 43% of physicians and medical students, respectively, were unaware that interventional procedures used ionizing radiation, and 28% of physicians were unaware that mammography used ionizing radiation. Computed tomographies and barium studies were thought to be associated with the least ionizing radiation among physicians.
CONCLUSION: There is a need for educating the public, medical students, and referring physicians about radiation exposure and associated risk so that (1) patients receiving multiple medical imaging tests are aware of the radiation that they are receiving and (2) physicians and future physicians will make informed decisions when ordering such tests to limit the amount of radiation that patients receive and to promote informed consent among patients.
Copyright © 2013 Canadian Association of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Computed tomography; Fluoroscopy; Radiation; Risk; Survey

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23267521     DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2012.05.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Assoc Radiol J        ISSN: 0846-5371            Impact factor:   2.248


  8 in total

1.  Increasing display luminance as a means to enhance interpretation accuracy and efficiency when reducing full-field digital mammography dose.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Krupinski
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-07-27

2.  Awareness of radiation risks from CT scans among patients and providers and obstacles for informed decision-making.

Authors:  Angel L Schuster; Howard P Forman; Paula D Strassle; Laura T Meyer; Scott V Connelly; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2017-09-26

3.  An Exploratory Analysis of Public Awareness and Perception of Ionizing Radiation and Guide to Public Health Practice in Vermont.

Authors:  Katherine M Evans; Jenna Bodmer; Bryce Edwards; James Levins; Amanda O'Meara; Merima Ruhotina; Richard Smith; Thomas Delaney; Razelle Hoffman-Contois; Linda Boccuzzo; Heidi Hales; Jan K Carney
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2015-04-28

4.  Avoiding fears and promoting shared decision-making: How should physicians inform patients about radiation exposure from imaging tests?

Authors:  Blanca Lumbreras; José Vilar; Isabel González-Álvarez; Mercedes Guilabert; María Pastor-Valero; Lucy Anne Parker; Jorge Vilar-Palop; Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Knowledge and Associated Factors of Medical Students Regarding Radiation Exposure from Common Diagnostic Imaging Procedures at the University of Gondar, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Dagnachew Eyachew Amare; Henok Dagne
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-07-01

6.  Counselees' Expressed Level of Understanding of the Risk Estimate and Surveillance Recommendation are Not Associated with Breast Cancer Surveillance Adherence.

Authors:  Akke Albada; Sandra van Dulmen; Henrietta Dijkstra; Ivette Wieffer; Arjen Witkamp; Margreet G E M Ausems
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Multidetector computed tomography utilization in an urban sub-Saharan Africa setting: user characteristics, indications and appropriateness.

Authors:  Joshua Tambe; Lawrence Mbuagbaw; Georges Nguefack-Tsague; Joseph Foyet; Pierre Ongolo-Zogo
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-09-09

8.  Assessment of Health Professionals' Attitudes on Radiation Protection Measures.

Authors:  Aspasia Goula; Athanasios Chatzis; Maria-Aggeliki Stamouli; Martha Kelesi; Evridiki Kaba; Emmanouil Brilakis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-12-19       Impact factor: 3.390

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.