Literature DB >> 23267357

The modern "3G" age of archaeal molecular biology.

Frank T Robb1, Todd M Lowe, Zvi Kelman.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 23267357      PMCID: PMC3527003          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


× No keyword cloud information.
The publication of the genome of Methanocaldococcus jannaschii in 1996 (Bult et al., 1996), just the second-ever complete microbial sequencing feat, marked an exciting beginning for archaeal genomics. In spite of the auspicious start, progress in archaeal genomics has been slow relative to bacteria and viruses, in part due to sequencing funding priorities favoring microbes with clinical relevance. In the last 5 years, the precipitous drop in high throughput sequencing costs and increasingly automated genome annotation has caused the inventory of archaeal genomes to grow exponentially. There is now genome representation in all major phyla of the Archaea, with a number of popular genera (including Halobacterium, Methanocaldococcus, Methanosarcina, Pyrobaculum, Pyrococcus, Sulfolobus, and Thermococcus) represented by multiple species. With these sequence data, comparative genomic studies have played an important role in integrating a broader evolutionary perspective into archaeal research. Experimental genetics now commonly utilize multiple archaeal species in a modern systems approach, coinciding with an increasing upswing in international collaboration. Multilaboratory consortia, such as the SulfoSys community (Albers et al., 2009), have started to break into new systems biology initiatives. At the same time, streamlined genetic approaches in the genera Halobacterium/Haloferax, Methanosarcina, Sulfolobus, and Thermococcus, are leveraging the growing wealth of genomic information in the Archaea. The result has been genome-driven studies of metabolism, DNA replication and repair, transcription and translation, and post-translational processing. This collection of 11 papers attempts to put this quiet maturation in archaeal molecular biology in context with a mix of overview articles (Atomi et al., 2012; Hileman and Santangelo, 2012; Kohler and Metcalf, 2012; Wagner et al., 2012) and original data (Bernick et al., 2012a,b; Iverson and Stedman, 2012; Mao and Grogan, 2012; Schut et al., 2012; Stroud et al., 2012; Szabo and Pohlschroder, 2012) highlighting the expansion of important areas enabled by the 3G's: genomics, genetics, and global collaboration. Research papers highlight the roles of small RNAs, CRISPR action, mechanisms of membrane secretion, hydrogen production, and DNA replication, while excellent technical overviews cover recently developed genetic methods within four major research communities utilizing Haloferax, Sulfolobus, Pyrococcus, or Thermococcus.
  13 in total

1.  SulfoSYS (Sulfolobus Systems Biology): towards a silicon cell model for the central carbohydrate metabolism of the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus under temperature variation.

Authors:  Sonja-Verena Albers; Nils-Kåre Birkeland; Arnold J M Driessen; Susanne Gertig; Patrick Haferkamp; Hans-Peter Klenk; Theresa Kouril; Andrea Manica; Trong K Pham; Peter Ruoff; Christa Schleper; Dietmar Schomburg; Kieran J Sharkey; Bettina Siebers; Pawel Sierocinski; Ralf Steuer; John van der Oost; Hans V Westerhoff; Patricia Wieloch; Phillip C Wright; Melanie Zaparty
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 5.407

2.  Complete genome sequence of the methanogenic archaeon, Methanococcus jannaschii.

Authors:  C J Bult; O White; G J Olsen; L Zhou; R D Fleischmann; G G Sutton; J A Blake; L M FitzGerald; R A Clayton; J D Gocayne; A R Kerlavage; B A Dougherty; J F Tomb; M D Adams; C I Reich; R Overbeek; E F Kirkness; K G Weinstock; J M Merrick; A Glodek; J L Scott; N S Geoghagen; J C Venter
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Diversity and subcellular distribution of archaeal secreted proteins.

Authors:  Zalan Szabo; Mechthild Pohlschroder
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 5.640

4.  Mutational Analyses of the Enzymes Involved in the Metabolism of Hydrogen by the Hyperthermophilic Archaeon Pyrococcus furiosus.

Authors:  Gerrit J Schut; William J Nixon; Gina L Lipscomb; Robert A Scott; Michael W W Adams
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  Comparative genomic and transcriptional analyses of CRISPR systems across the genus Pyrobaculum.

Authors:  David L Bernick; Courtney L Cox; Patrick P Dennis; Todd M Lowe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-13       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Heteroduplex formation, mismatch resolution, and genetic sectoring during homologous recombination in the hyperthermophilic archaeon sulfolobus acidocaldarius.

Authors:  Dominic Mao; Dennis W Grogan
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  A genetic study of SSV1, the prototypical fusellovirus.

Authors:  Eric Iverson; Kenneth Stedman
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 5.640

8.  Diversity of Antisense and Other Non-Coding RNAs in Archaea Revealed by Comparative Small RNA Sequencing in Four Pyrobaculum Species.

Authors:  David L Bernick; Patrick P Dennis; Lauren M Lui; Todd M Lowe
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  Genetics Techniques for Thermococcus kodakarensis.

Authors:  Travis H Hileman; Thomas J Santangelo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Genetic manipulation of Methanosarcina spp.

Authors:  Petra R A Kohler; William W Metcalf
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-24       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.