Literature DB >> 23267287

Colonoscopy completion rates and reasons for incompletion.

Badr Aljarallah1, Bader Alshammari.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Colonoscopy is one of the major procedures in gastroenterology. Since the procedure is operator dependant, Quality of each procedure is the main element of reliable outcome. One of the elements is the completion rate. Completion rate of endoscopy unit is a reliable measure to improve the quality of the procedure.
METHODOLOGY: We here reviewed retrospectively our endoscopy database from the main tertiary hospital in Qassim province, central part of Saudi Arabia. The recommended completion based on several professional societies range from 90 - 95 % completion rate according to the indication. We retrospectively reviewed our endoscopy database over the period from 2005 to 2008 in King Fahad Specialist Hospital.
RESULTS: Our adjusted completion rate was 85.3 %. The main reason of incompletion was poor preparation. Our completion rate was comparable throughout the study period.
CONCLUSION: our completion rate is below recommended range. We think this result will stimulate the efforts to incorporate more quality measures in the endoscopy unit.

Keywords:  Colonoscopy; Qassim Region

Year:  2011        PMID: 23267287      PMCID: PMC3521826     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)        ISSN: 1658-3639


  24 in total

1.  Total colonoscopy: is it always possible?

Authors:  J D Waye; E Bashkoff
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1991 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? Do reviewers agree?

Authors:  J B Marshall; D N Brown
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better.

Authors:  J C Anderson; J D Gonzalez; C R Messina; B J Pollack
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 10.864

4.  Patient factors influencing the completion rate in colonoscopy.

Authors:  G Dafnis; F Granath; L Påhlman; A Ekbom; P Blomqvist
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.088

5.  Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized prospective trail comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol in a predominantly elderly population.

Authors:  A Thomson; P Naidoo; B Crotty
Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.029

6.  Documenting the use of fluoroscopy during colonoscopic examination: a prospective study.

Authors:  W C Cirocco; L C Rusin
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Technical performance of colonoscopy: the key role of sedation/analgesia and other quality indicators.

Authors:  Franco Radaelli; Gianmichele Meucci; Giusy Sgroi; Giorgio Minoli
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-28       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Patient factors predicting the completion of sedation-free colonoscopy.

Authors:  Ming-Shian Tsai; Yen-Hao Su; Jin-Tung Liang; Hong-Shiee Lai; Po-Huang Lee
Journal:  Hepatogastroenterology       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct

9.  Why is colonoscopy more difficult in women?

Authors:  B P Saunders; M Fukumoto; S Halligan; C Jobling; M E Moussa; C I Bartram; C B Williams
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.427

10.  Colonoscopy findings in symptomatic patients without X-ray evidence of colonic neoplasms.

Authors:  M C Aldridge; A J Sim
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-10-11       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  1 in total

1.  Prospective study of factors important to achieve observation of the entire colon on colon capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  Junichi Sato; Masanao Nakamura; Osamu Watanabe; Takeshi Yamamura; Kohei Funasaka; Eizaburo Ohno; Ryoji Miyahara; Hiroki Kawashima; Hidemi Goto; Yoshiki Hirooka
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 4.409

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.