Literature DB >> 8672752

Bowel preparation for colonoscopy: a randomized prospective trail comparing sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol in a predominantly elderly population.

A Thomson1, P Naidoo, B Crotty.   

Abstract

Many patients find polyethylene glycol-based preparations (PEG) difficult to take because of the large volume of fluid they are required to consume. One hundred and sixteen predominantly elderly patients were randomized to receive either sodium phosphate (n = 61) or PEG (n = 55) bowel preparations before colonoscopy. Patients with a history of symptomatic ischaemic heart disease or cerebrovascular disease in the preceding 6 months, severe liver disease or heart failure, or serum creatinine above 200 micrograms/L were excluded from the study. Each patient filled in a questionnaire about the bowel preparation prior to the procedure. The colonoscopists, who were not aware which preparation had been used, were asked to complete a questionnaire about the quality of the bowel preparation after the procedure. The patients found the sodium phosphate preparation slightly more tolerable than PEG. Side effects were slightly more common with sodium phosphate. Neither difference was statistically significant. However, 91% of patients who had previously had PEG found sodium phosphate easier to take. Approximately 25% of patients in each group experienced at least one episode of incontinence. The colonoscopists found no difference in the overall quality of the bowel preparation. The amount of fluid in the colon was greater in patients prepared with PEG. As expected, patients taking sodium phosphate developed hyperphosphataemia (mean phosphate level before colonoscopy 1.56 mmol/L, normal 0.8 -1.3). They also had a lower mean serum potassium level (3.8 mmol/L) than the PEG group (4.2 mmol/L). However, there were no clinically significant consequences. Sodium phosphate was a safe and effective bowel preparation for colonoscopy in this carefully selected group of patients. It was preferred by patients who had previously had PEG. Many elderly patients were found to develop faecal incontinence, irrespective of the type of bowel preparation used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8672752     DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.1996.tb00044.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol Hepatol        ISSN: 0815-9319            Impact factor:   4.029


  17 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic complications--avoidance and management.

Authors:  Daniel Blero; Jacques Devière
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-02-14       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  Commonly used preparations for colonoscopy: efficacy, tolerability, and safety--a Canadian Association of Gastroenterology position paper.

Authors:  Alan Barkun; Naoki Chiba; Robert Enns; Margaret Marcon; Susan Natsheh; Co Pham; Dan Sadowski; Stephen Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  A consensus document on bowel preparation before colonoscopy: prepared by a task force from the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES).

Authors:  Steven D Wexner; David E Beck; Todd H Baron; Robert D Fanelli; Neil Hyman; Bo Shen; Kevin E Wasco
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-06-08       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Polyethylene glycol vs. sodium phosphate for bowel preparation: a treatment arm meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Ravi Juluri; George Eckert; Thomas F Imperiale
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Oral colorectal cleansing preparations in adults.

Authors:  Sherief Shawki; Steven D Wexner
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Colonoscopy: Reducing faecal incontinence following colonoscopy.

Authors:  Felix W Leung
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Colonoscopy completion rates and reasons for incompletion.

Authors:  Badr Aljarallah; Bader Alshammari
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2011-07

Review 8.  Meta-analysis: randomized controlled trials of 4-L polyethylene glycol and sodium phosphate solution as bowel preparation for colonoscopy.

Authors:  R Juluri; G Eckert; T F Imperiale
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 8.171

9.  Effects of the addition of high-dose vitamin C to polyethylene glycol solution for colonic cleansing: A pilot study in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  Stéphane Mouly; Isabelle Mahé; Anne-Laure Knellwolf; Guy Simoneau; Jean-François Bergmann
Journal:  Curr Ther Res Clin Exp       Date:  2005-11

10.  Combined low volume polyethylene glycol solution plus stimulant laxatives versus standard volume polyethylene glycol solution: a prospective, randomized study of colon cleansing before colonoscopy.

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey; William T Depew; Stephen J Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.522

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.