Literature DB >> 23266747

The distributed representation of random and meaningful object pairs in human occipitotemporal cortex: the weighted average as a general rule.

Annelies Baeck1, Johan Wagemans, Hans P Op de Beeck.   

Abstract

Natural scenes typically contain multiple visual objects, often in interaction, such as when a bottle is used to fill a glass. Previous studies disagree about the representation of multiple objects and the role of object position herein, nor did they pinpoint the effect of potential interactions between the objects. In an fMRI study, we presented four single objects in two different positions and object pairs consisting of all possible combinations of the single objects. Objects pairs could form either a meaningful action configuration in which they interact with each other or a non-meaningful configuration. We found that for single objects and object pairs both identity and position were represented in multi-voxel activity patterns in LOC. The response patterns of object pairs were best predicted by a weighted average of the response patterns of the constituent objects, with the strongest single-object response (the max response) weighted more than the min response. The difference in weight between the max and the min object was larger for familiar action pairs than for other pairs when participants attended to the configuration. A weighted average thus relates the response patterns of object pairs to the response patterns of single objects, even when the objects interact.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23266747     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  21 in total

1.  Whole-agent selectivity within the macaque face-processing system.

Authors:  Clark Fisher; Winrich A Freiwald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2015-10-13       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Sensitivity to timing and order in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Jedediah M Singer; Joseph R Madsen; William S Anderson; Gabriel Kreiman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The Representation of Two-Body Shapes in the Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Etienne Abassi; Liuba Papeo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Feature-coding transitions to conjunction-coding with progression through human visual cortex.

Authors:  Rosemary A Cowell; Krystal R Leger; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  One object, two networks? Assessing the relationship between the face and body-selective regions in the primate visual system.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; J Brendan Ritchie; Leslie G Ungerleider; Christopher I Baker
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-11-18       Impact factor: 3.270

6.  Clutter substantially reduces selectivity for peripheral faces in the macaque brain.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Susan G Wardle; Clarissa T Tardiff; Amanda Patterson; David Yu; Chris I Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 6.709

7.  The Functional Organization of High-Level Visual Cortex Determines the Representation of Complex Visual Stimuli.

Authors:  Libi Kliger; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Whole person-evoked fMRI activity patterns in human fusiform gyrus are accurately modeled by a linear combination of face- and body-evoked activity patterns.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Lukas Strnad; Katharina N Seidl; Sabine Kastner; Marius V Peelen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-10-09       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Human-Object Interactions Are More than the Sum of Their Parts.

Authors:  Christopher Baldassano; Diane M Beck; Li Fei-Fei
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 5.357

10.  There Is a "U" in Clutter: Evidence for Robust Sparse Codes Underlying Clutter Tolerance in Human Vision.

Authors:  Patrick H Cox; Maximilian Riesenhuber
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.