Literature DB >> 27073216

Human-Object Interactions Are More than the Sum of Their Parts.

Christopher Baldassano1, Diane M Beck2, Li Fei-Fei1.   

Abstract

Understanding human-object interactions is critical for extracting meaning from everyday visual scenes and requires integrating complex relationships between human pose and object identity into a new percept. To understand how the brain builds these representations, we conducted 2 fMRI experiments in which subjects viewed humans interacting with objects, noninteracting human-object pairs, and isolated humans and objects. A number of visual regions process features of human-object interactions, including object identity information in the lateral occipital complex (LOC) and parahippocampal place area (PPA), and human pose information in the extrastriate body area (EBA) and posterior superior temporal sulcus (pSTS). Representations of human-object interactions in some regions, such as the posterior PPA (retinotopic maps PHC1 and PHC2) are well predicted by a simple linear combination of the response to object and pose information. Other regions, however, especially pSTS, exhibit representations for human-object interaction categories that are not predicted by their individual components, indicating that they encode human-object interactions as more than the sum of their parts. These results reveal the distributed networks underlying the emergent representation of human-object interactions necessary for social perception.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MVPA; action perception; cross-decoding; fMRI; scene perception

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27073216      PMCID: PMC5963823          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhw077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  57 in total

1.  Seeing the action: neuropsychological evidence for action-based effects on object selection.

Authors:  M Jane Riddoch; Glyn W Humphreys; Sarah Edwards; Tracy Baker; Katherine Willson
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 2.  The mirror neuron system and action recognition.

Authors:  Giovanni Buccino; Ferdinand Binkofski; Lucia Riggio
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  Neural circuits involved in the recognition of actions performed by nonconspecifics: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Giovanni Buccino; Fausta Lui; Nicola Canessa; Ilaria Patteri; Giovanna Lagravinese; Francesca Benuzzi; Carlo A Porro; Giacomo Rizzolatti
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Where do objects become scenes?

Authors:  Jiye G Kim; Irving Biederman
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers.

Authors:  B Calvo-Merino; D E Glaser; J Grèzes; R E Passingham; P Haggard
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 6.  Eight problems for the mirror neuron theory of action understanding in monkeys and humans.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Puzzlingly High Correlations in fMRI Studies of Emotion, Personality, and Social Cognition.

Authors:  Edward Vul; Christine Harris; Piotr Winkielman; Harold Pashler
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2009-05

8.  Probabilistic Maps of Visual Topography in Human Cortex.

Authors:  Liang Wang; Ryan E B Mruczek; Michael J Arcaro; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

9.  Grasping the intentions of others: the perceived intentionality of an action influences activity in the superior temporal sulcus during social perception.

Authors:  Kevin A Pelphrey; James P Morris; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain.

Authors:  Svenja Caspers; Karl Zilles; Angela R Laird; Simon B Eickhoff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  12 in total

1.  Parts-based representations of perceived face movements in the superior temporal sulcus.

Authors:  Ben Deen; Rebecca Saxe
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Transformation of Event Representations along Middle Temporal Gyrus.

Authors:  Anna Leshinskaya; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 5.357

3.  The Representation of Two-Body Shapes in the Human Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Etienne Abassi; Liuba Papeo
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-12-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Clutter substantially reduces selectivity for peripheral faces in the macaque brain.

Authors:  Jessica Taubert; Susan G Wardle; Clarissa T Tardiff; Amanda Patterson; David Yu; Chris I Baker
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 6.709

5.  The Functional Organization of High-Level Visual Cortex Determines the Representation of Complex Visual Stimuli.

Authors:  Libi Kliger; Galit Yovel
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Real-world structure facilitates the rapid emergence of scene category information in visual brain signals.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Greta Häberle; Radoslaw M Cichy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Two Distinct Scene-Processing Networks Connecting Vision and Memory.

Authors:  Christopher Baldassano; Andre Esteva; Li Fei-Fei; Diane M Beck
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2016-10-24

8.  Ultra-rapid object categorization in real-world scenes with top-down manipulations.

Authors:  Bingjie Xu; Mohan S Kankanhalli; Qi Zhao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Neural responses to visually observed social interactions.

Authors:  Jon Walbrin; Paul Downing; Kami Koldewyn
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Cortical sensitivity to natural scene structure.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Greta Häberle; Radoslaw M Cichy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-11-22       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.