Literature DB >> 23265838

The link between women's body image disturbances and body-focused cancer screening behaviors: a critical review of the literature and a new integrated model for women.

Danielle R Ridolfi1, Janis H Crowther.   

Abstract

A large body of literature demonstrates the association between body image disturbances and health compromising behaviors among women (e.g., pathological eating, substance use, inappropriate exercise). However, given that disturbed body image is a pervasive problem, it is likely inversely related to health maintenance behaviors. Cancer screenings for breast, skin, and cervical cancer represent an important type of health maintenance behavior, yet adherence rates are low. Given the body-focused nature of these screenings, body image may be a salient predictor. This paper reviews the literature on the relationship between body image disturbances and cancer screening behaviors among women culminating in the proposal of a theoretical model. This model posits that body shame and body avoidance predict performance of cancer screenings and that variables drawn from the cancer literature, including risk perception, health anxiety, subjective norms, and self-efficacy, may moderate this relationship. Clinical implications and suggestions for research are discussed.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23265838     DOI: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2012.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Body Image        ISSN: 1740-1445


  9 in total

1.  Accuracy of urinary human papillomavirus testing for the presence of cervical human papillomaviruses and higher grades of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.

Authors:  Chandrika J Piyathilake; Suguna Badiga; Michelle M Chambers; Ilene K Brill; Roland Matthews; Edward E Partridge
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-05-31       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 2.  Conceptualizing body dissatisfaction in eating disorders within a self-discrepancy framework: a review of evidence.

Authors:  Elin L Lantz; Monika E Gaspar; Rebecca DiTore; Amani D Piers; Katherine Schaumberg
Journal:  Eat Weight Disord       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.652

3.  A systematic review and synthesis of qualitative and quantitative studies evaluating provider, patient, and health care system-related barriers to diagnostic skin cancer examinations.

Authors:  Maleka Najmi; Ashley E Brown; Sarah R Harrington; David Farris; Sarah Sepulveda; Kelly C Nelson
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 3.017

4.  The role of general psychosocial factors for the use of cancer screening-Findings of a population-based observational study among older adults in Germany.

Authors:  André Hajek; Jens-Oliver Bock; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2017-10-13       Impact factor: 4.452

5.  Body image satisfaction, sociodemographic, functional and clinical aspects of community-dwelling older adults.

Authors:  Raquel Rousselet Farias; Renata Breda Martins; Vivian Ulrich; João Henrique Correa Kanan; Irenio Gomes da Silva; Thais de Lima Resende
Journal:  Dement Neuropsychol       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep

6.  Double Discourse: Qualitative Perspectives on Breast Screening Participation among Obese Women and Their Health Care Providers.

Authors:  Kate A McBride; Catharine A K Fleming; Emma S George; Genevieve Z Steiner; Freya MacMillan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Is Childhood Maltreatment Associated with Body Image Disturbances in Adulthood? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Christine Bödicker; Jonas Reinckens; Michael Höfler; Jürgen Hoyer
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Trauma       Date:  2021-08-07

8.  Lack of Awareness, Body Confidence and Connotations of Sex: An Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis of Barriers Affecting the Decision to Attend Initial Cervical Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Phoebe Brook-Rowland; Katherine A Finlay
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-10-07       Impact factor: 1.475

9.  Psychological determinants of influenza vaccination.

Authors:  Jens-Oliver Bock; André Hajek; Hans-Helmut König
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.