Literature DB >> 2326488

Associative strength effects in the lexical decision task.

J J Cañas1.   

Abstract

Four experiments explore the role of automatic and attentional processing in producing strength effects in a lexical decision task. Experiment 1 manipulated the relative proportion of related and unrelated pairs, the stimulus-onset-asynchrony (SOA), and the strength of the prime-target relationship. Results indicated that strength was independent of the proportion of related and unrelated pairs and SOA. Experiment 2 manipulated the relative proportion of strong and weak related pairs and the strength of the prime-target relationship at a relatively long SOA interval (500 msec). Results showed that the strength effect was present when more strong than weak pairs were presented, and it was absent when the stimulus list contained more weak than strong pairs. Experiment 3 replicated the more weak pairs condition of Experiment 2 but with a short SOA interval (100 msec) and showed that the strength effect was found regardless of the large number of weak related pairs presented. Experiment 4 manipulated strength of the prime-target relationship and proportion of strong and weak pairs but introducing a neutral prime condition and a longer SOA interval (1000 msec). Results are discussed within a two-process model (Posner & Snyder, 1975) postulating that the strength effect at short SOAs is due to automatic processes, whereas at long SOAs it is due to the influence of attentional processes.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2326488     DOI: 10.1080/14640749008401211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  9 in total

1.  What is free association and what does it measure?

Authors:  D L Nelson; C L McEvoy; S Dennis
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

2.  What is this thing called frequency?

Authors:  D L Nelson; C L McEvoy
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-06

3.  Is there a "strength effect" in automatic semantic priming?

Authors:  David Anaki; Avishai Henik
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-03

4.  Dissociative effects in different prime domains.

Authors:  D L Nelson; M J LaLomia; J J Canas
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1991-01

5.  Hemispheric differences in word-meaning processing: Alternative interpretations of current evidence.

Authors:  Wiltrud Fassbinder; Connie A Tompkins
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 2.773

6.  One step is not enough: making better use of association norms to predict cued recall.

Authors:  D L Nelson; D J Bennett; T W Leibert
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

7.  Activation and maintenance of peripheral semantic features of unambiguous words after right hemisphere brain damage in adults.

Authors:  Connie A Tompkins; Wiltrud Fassbinder; Victoria L Scharp; Kimberly M Meigh
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 2.773

8.  Gradients versus dichotomies: how strength of semantic context influences event-related potentials and lexical decision times.

Authors:  Barbara J Luka; Cyma Van Petten
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 3.526

9.  Influence of Psychological Vulnerability Factors for Bipolar Disorders on a Semantic Mediated Priming Task.

Authors:  Mélanie Labalestra; Nicolas Stefaniak; Laurent Lefebvre; Chrystel Besche-Richard
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-06-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.